Week 9 thread - We’re on to Cincinnati

[HereComesTheReignAgain]

3 minutes ago, balln said:

Zac Taylor took over a worse roster. Joe was out all year w a knee- so career winning % isn’t doing it for me 

 

He’s beaten kc in arrowhead a LOt. And in the playoffs . He’s beaten McD badly at home in buf. I don’t see dumb TOs or challenges w cin. He’s gone to a Super Bowl 

 

 

 

OK, let's just look at the measurable stats since 2021.  McDermott has a better winning percentage in every season.  

[Warcodered]

2 hours ago, zow2 said:

 

McD is usually pretty good in revenge game scenarios.  I think he does have it circled. 

I'd think there's a good chance the whole team has this game circled, not only did they play bad against them in that playoff game to end their season but their was a lot of ***** talk from the Bengals afterwords.

[billsbackto81]

I think the offense will show up. They'll stick to 11 personnel and continue to spread the ball to different receivers while making a conscious effort to run the ball.

 

Unfortunately I don't think the defense can keep the Bengals or any other top caliber team from scoring often.  

 

I don't expect Beane to make any trades to shore up our shortcomings on D (SURPRISE!) And it's just gonna be too hard to keep good teams from scoring with what we have currently. 

 

They couldn't put away the Giants, NE or Bucs from winning or keeping it close in the 4th. Whether it be players or coaching decisions. 3 of the worse offenses in the league that had no business in the game. 

 

But, I will continue to hold out hope, GO BILLS!!!

[Nuncha]

Not feeling good about this one.  Of course, I hope I am wrong.

[balln]

4 minutes ago, HereComesTheReignAgain said:

OK, let's just look at the measurable stats since 2021.  McDermott has a better winning percentage in every season.  

I don’t care about reg season winning % for a Hc 

 

Tony dungy

Marty S

marv 

 
how about this 

zac Taylor w burrow is better than McD w Allen 

Edited October 30, 2023 by balln

[freddyjj]

9 minutes ago, balln said:

He’s beaten kc in arrowhead a LOt.

While Taylor with Burrow is 3-1 vs Chiefs they have only 1 win at Arrowhead in 2 tries.  

 

[Straight Hucklebuck]

You look at the depth chart on that Cincinnati defense. 

 

That's primarily what the 2023 Draft was for them - 2 deep at every position now. 

 

They are a defensive team that has one elite QB to WR pairing. 

 

Against the Bills last year they were able to run at will as well. 

[balln]

Just now, Straight Hucklebuck said:

You look at the depth chart on that Cincinnati defense. 

 

That's primarily what the 2023 Draft was for them - 2 deep at every position now. 

 

They are a defensive team that has one elite QB to WR pairing. 

 

Against the Bills last year they were able to run at will as well. 

Interesting. And beane and Sean draft Dorian.
 

and we have 1! 1 injury to Lb. 

 

And they can’t even play him now. 

[SCBills]

3 minutes ago, balln said:

Interesting. And beane and Sean draft Dorian.
 

and we have 1! 1 injury to Lb. 

 

And they can’t even play him now. 

 

Frustrating..

 

Bernard looking overwhelmed his rookie year and playing like a legitimate pro-bowl caliber player in Year 2 absolves them a bit, but a RD3 pick should be sufficient depth at any non-QB position.  The fact the can't/won't play Dorian Williams is very annoying.  

 

The guy taken one pick before him was set to start at LB for Dallas before he suffered a season ending injury in pre-season. 

[Straight Hucklebuck]

2 minutes ago, balln said:

Interesting. And beane and Sean draft Dorian.
 

and we have 1! 1 injury to Lb. 

 

And they can’t even play him now. 

And it's not like Duke Tobin has been an all-world drafter. 

 

Cincinnati has gone in runs, the mid-2000's with Palmer, Chris Henry, Chad Johnson, T. J. Houshmandzadeh, Rudi Johnson  - a tear down and build back with Dalton, AJ Green, Marvin Jones, Mohammed Sanu and their all 1st Round secondary - Pac Man, Terrence Newman, Reggie Nelson, Leon Hall, William Jackson in the mid-2010's. 

 

And now they've stacked a few good drafts in a row together. 

[balln]

Just now, SCBills said:

 

Frustrating..

 

Bernard looking overwhelmed his rookie year and playing like a legitimate pro-bowl caliber player in Year 2 absolves them a bit, but a RD3 pick should be sufficient depth at any non-QB position.  The fact the can't/won't play Dorian Williams is very annoying.  

 

The guy taken one pick before him was set to start at LB for Dallas before he suffered a season ending injury in pre-season. 

right - notice i said THEY cant even play him. I think Dorian can play and youll have to live and die by his play. But instead true to form these coaches and player evaluators ahve decided to play it safe and die a slow death w dodson. OR poyer at LB!

 

its crazy

[Lost]

14 hours ago, 78thealltimegreat said:

The blue print is out there to beat Cincy. 

 

In the world of football, where the plays are grand,
There's a lesson to learn, in this sporty land.
It's about a coach, Ken Dorsey by name,
And a play he called once, in a moment of fame.

 

"Ken Dorsey," they said, "you're a football sage,
But this one play call, it's like a page,
From the book of strange choices, a puzzling decision,
A Shotgun Draw Play, it lacks football precision."

 

It happened on second and goal, from the one-yard line,
A chance to score points, a moment so fine.
But the call was quite curious, to everyone's surprise,
A Shotgun Draw Play, with wide-open eyes.

 

The quarterback backed up, the snap in his hand,
The defense advanced, like a shifting sand.
The running back took it, tried to make a dash,
But the defenders swarmed, like a lightning flash.

 

"Ken Dorsey," they shouted, "what did you do?
A Shotgun Draw Play from the one-yard, it's true.
You've got to be careful, make choices that fit,
In this game of inches, where touchdowns are lit."

 

So let this be a lesson to coaches, you see,
In the world of football, for you and for me.
A Shotgun Draw Play, from the one-yard line?
It's a choice that may not end as divine.

 

Stick to the basics, keep it simple and true,
And your team will succeed, that's what they'll do.
In football, as in life, the lesson is clear,
Don't make strange decisions, let your choices steer.

 

[HoofHearted]

3 minutes ago, balln said:

right - notice i said THEY cant even play him. I think Dorian can play and youll have to live and die by his play. But instead true to form these coaches and player evaluators ahve decided to play it safe and die a slow death w dodson. OR poyer at LB!

 

its crazy

So you want to keep playing the kid even if it's to the detriment of the team, and likely the kid as well? This is the NFL - one big play can lose you a game. Always play the more consistent player regardless of potential.

[balln]

1 minute ago, HoofHearted said:

So you want to keep playing the kid even if it's to the detriment of the team, and likely the kid as well? This is the NFL - one big play can lose you a game. Always play the more consistent player regardless of potential.

in general you are right. But we have major season ending injuries at all 3 levels. OUR depth arguable is DL and secondary. So we need to play , god forbid, SOME of our rookies - slow development be damned. You cant tell me dorian who balled out vs usc (spread O) in a bowl game cant be COACHED up by our COACHES. AND as an off ball LB if that is the critical achilles heel of this D to give up the big play that loses us games - then our problem is the COACHES and player evaluators

[HoofHearted]

43 minutes ago, finn said:

I'm thinking that the Bills need to surprise the Bengals on both sides of the ball to avoid a blowout. The hurry-up pace Dorsey tried last week is encouraging. I hope they add more wrinkles. It's time to play loose, take some risks. Fake punts, QB runs, going on fourth down, power running, end arounds... This offense is thinking too much. They need to have fun--and stay one step ahead of the Bengals' excellent DC.

 

On defense, maybe replace Dodson with Rapp or Hamlin. Put Rousseau at tackle. Activate the physically talented Elam to erase Chase. Something to flumox an increasingly confident team with momentum.

 

But it's more likely that McDermott will want to stay conservative, kick field goals, play bend-don't-break ball, and hope for a close win. If he does, I predict a Bengals blowout. 

Add more wrinkles to an offense that is already thinking too much?

 

McDermott has already shown his answer to Dodson's lack of athleticism - it's Poyer.

[HoofHearted]

2 minutes ago, balln said:

in general you are right. But we have major season ending injuries at all 3 levels. OUR depth arguable is DL and secondary. So we need to play , god forbid, SOME of our rookies - slow development be damned. You cant tell me dorian who balled out vs usc (spread O) in a bowl game cant be COACHED up by our COACHES. AND as an off ball LB if that is the critical achilles heel of this D to give up the big play that loses us games - then our problem is the COACHES and player evaluators

Dorian will be fine - there's no reason to rush him into action though just because he was a 3rd round pick - especially when he's been out-performed by Dodson. He's a rookie! Learning an entirely new scheme, as complex as nfl defenses are, it's tough for anyone let alone a guy straight out of college. You can see he's being coached, he's just a step slow right now and that's mostly because he's still thinking within the scheme. As far as the importance of an off ball LB in our defense - it's freaking defense dude - you can't hide anyone. Eventually a weakness will be exposed. Coaches have all the time in the world to scheme up ways to attack individual players - and if you think they're not you're kidding yourself.

[90sBills]

39 minutes ago, balln said:

 

He’s beaten kc in arrowhead a LOt.

 

You should tell Zac Taylor this. I don’t think he’d considered once ‘a lot’.

[Bob Jones]

47 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said:

The sentiment here is not a reflection of how unbiased NFL observers are thinking about the game. 

So one thing about this though….a LOT of people in here watch every Bills game, every week, and they have been doing so for decades. And a LOT of the latter folks are very knowledgeable about what they are seeing. And other younger, less knowledgeable people who peruse this forum get to read the “takes” from said knowledgeable posters, so then they gain knowledge, and know what to look for in future games.

 

OTOH, we have unbiased NFL observers, or if you will, “experts”, (LOL) who DO NOT see every play from every game that the Bills play in. Most of them think McClappy is a great coach….”Look at his record!” And some of these so called experts are younger than the skin tags in my armpits.

 

Bottom line, I’ll take the sentiment in here over those experts all day, every day. 😉

[Billsfan1972]

25 minutes ago, billsbackto81 said:

I think the offense will show up. They'll stick to 11 personnel and continue to spread the ball to different receivers while making a conscious effort to run the ball.

 

Unfortunately I don't think the defense can keep the Bengals or any other top caliber team from scoring often.  

 

I don't expect Beane to make any trades to shore up our shortcomings on D (SURPRISE!) And it's just gonna be too hard to keep good teams from scoring with what we have currently. 

 

They couldn't put away the Giants, NE or Bucs from winning or keeping it close in the 4th. Whether it be players or coaching decisions. 3 of the worse offenses in the league that had no business in the game. 

 

But, I will continue to hold out hope, GO BILLS!!!

And again ignoring the elephant in the room, McD.  It is the coach's responsibility to to get the team ready and McD has to do a better job with the defense.  Yes Cincy has played better and had a great game vs. SF, but only 17 vs. Seattle and other games where they've struggled.  We need to hold the defense accountable.  

[Success]

Quite a bit of pessimism on this thread.

 

Not entirely unwarranted, but I don't see a huge difference between Cincy & Buffalo.  They have some areas where they are stronger, and so do we.  Their defense can be exploited, just like ours can.

 

It will be tough to cover their receivers - but our line is a strength.  The game will likely hinge on how much they can disrupt Burrow.