Jump to content

The Knox injury unfortunately has changed this offense for the better


FireChans

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, FireChans said:

It sucks that Knox is injured. I like him as a player.

 

But it’s clear that without Knox, we are no longer forcing 12 personnel, which has clearly been holding this offense back. 
 

Unfortuantelt, we may see the 12 return when Knox gets healthy because Dorsey is going to have to include him and Kincaid. But the biggest difference tonight was 11 personnel. Dorsey is still Dorsey. this team is just better at 11 as currently constructed.

I think if you use them in a spread offense like we did a lot tonite it could work well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, FireChans said:

It sucks that Knox is injured. I like him as a player.

 

But it’s clear that without Knox, we are no longer forcing 12 personnel, which has clearly been holding this offense back. 
 

Unfortuantelt, we may see the 12 return when Knox gets healthy because Dorsey is going to have to include him and Kincaid. But the biggest difference tonight was 11 personnel. Dorsey is still Dorsey. this team is just better at 11 as currently constructed.

It sucks that he’s injured…And I don’t like him as a player…😉

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, FireChans said:

It sucks that Knox is injured. I like him as a player.

 

But it’s clear that without Knox, we are no longer forcing 12 personnel, which has clearly been holding this offense back. 
 

Unfortuantelt, we may see the 12 return when Knox gets healthy because Dorsey is going to have to include him and Kincaid. But the biggest difference tonight was 11 personnel. Dorsey is still Dorsey. this team is just better at 11 as currently constructed.

I agree. It is not because Knox was bad, it is just because we look better with 1 TE and 3WR, than we do with 2TE and 2 WR. This was the Offense we all know and love.  

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, HomeskillitMoorman said:


It wasn’t that much better in the end, I think it just felt like that because they got off to a better start. 
 

They had 3 tremendous opportunities to kill the game in the 4th and came up empty on all of those drives. 
 

Make no mistake, this offense still has big problems. 

If McD goes for it on either of these early 4th QTR 4th downs in plus territory, I believe they

get ‘em and rhe Bills win by 28. O was playing well. Just got ultra conservative

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Araiza Curse said:

Henry seals up the victory if we had him tonight. I still hope we trade for him. Henry+Cook is dangerous. 

Hunter Henry?

 

We would have like 33 million dollars tied up to the TE position, with how many traded draft picks/investments at TE.

 

If you weren’t talking about HH, my apologies 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, buffaloboyinATL said:

I agree. It is not because Knox was bad, it is just because we look better with 1 TE and 3WR, than we do with 2TE and 2 WR. This was the Offense we all know and love.  

We look better spreading the field and going no huddle 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, buffaloboyinATL said:

I agree. It is not because Knox was bad, it is just because we look better with 1 TE and 3WR, than we do with 2TE and 2 WR. This was the Offense we all know and love.  

Agreed. 
 

I’m not sure what the reason is, I haven’t broken it down enough.

 

it was kind of a good idea in principle. League is getting smaller and faster and try to play on that. We just either don’t have the horses, the coaches, or even the QB for that type O.

 

Either way, it’s on the shelf for a while.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, WEATHER DOT COM said:


Agree.

 

This offense was nowhere near good enough though to confirm it’s better with Knox on the bench. 

oh yeah it’s definitely not better. I’m hoping for more Shakir and 11p after Knox comes back, but not being able to run 12p makes us way more 1 dimensional.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Knox will come back as the 5th option in the offense and doing a lot of the blocking and grinding work that he does well. And that’s a perfect spot for him to be in. Shakir and Kincaid and reliable slot options and Gabe may not be the stud WR2 we all hoped he could be but he still is a solid WR and adds that outside presence. 
 

Assuming Knox comes back in December I hope they use him as a “utility” player along with a second TE. Using him as a full back of lining up in more creative spaces where he can block or leak out for easy catches. 
 

I still think Knox has a place in the offense just has to be used differently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SageAgainstTheMachine said:

Kincaid and Shakir gathering more targets is a good thing.  Just to play some devil's advocate though, we are going to see some MUCH better D-lines than Tampa's going forward and Knox will be missed there.

Certainly, but the counterpoint would be that if Josh can release it as fast as he was tonight, he’s gonna neutralize a lot of DL’s.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kincaid is certainly playing well,  but I tend to think that a large part of it has also been Khalil Shakir.  This is a team that has lost three good WRs over the last couple of years and made minimal effort to replace them.  Now that Shakir appears to be stepping up,  providing Josh with a competent, reliable 3rd option at WR,  it's no surprise that the offense looks better. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...