Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
21 minutes ago, The Wiz said:

What would we even expect to get for a 1st rounder in his 2nd season that has barely played?  4th or 5th if lucky?

 

That's not the type of trade that Beane would normally make unless they truly think there is no hope for him.

Trade for a conditional pick based on playing time with his new team. At most think we could get a 4th. 

Posted
7 minutes ago, Yobogoya! said:

 

He might not make it through the first half, honestly. 

 

And knowing McD we'll probably have at most 4 active corners... Should go over well, lol. 


We're gonna make Borker Mayfield look like Aaron ROgers, arent we?

  • Sad 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, boyst said:

beane is so damn good at so much but his downfall is going to be the scouting department and valuation of players. there is just a disconnect here  with the FO and coaching that is reaching terminal velocity

 

McD and Beane were a package deal from the get go. They're like peas in a pod. 

 

The number of scheme incompatible players we've brought in during their tenure truly baffles the mind. Few GM/HC combos should be as aligned as these two. 

 

You could almost make the argument Whaley brought in better fits for McD before he was given the boot. Including: two all-pro safeties, an all pro CB, an all pro LB and a pro bowl LT. Yeesh. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, Big Turk said:

I don't like it...the dude has shown the ability to play well at times. If anything the way they have handled him has destroyed his confidence more than anything.  What a waste. Guarantee if he goes somewhere else and gets a chance within a year we will regret that in a Wyatt Teller sort of way, although I wouldn't go as far as saying he will become an all-pro.

 

This is the limitation of McD on D.  He would rather play low end players who are safer with limited upside than potential high end players that may require some time to get there.  No other team in the NFL would be having Benford, Jackson and Ingram play in place of Elam.

 

I agree w/ this.  I feel like there are certain guys who have the talent to play here, but because of some special "quality" they need to have or something, they just can't gain enough favor w/ the coaches to get playing time.

 

It wouldn't surprise me at all to see Elam go somewhere else and have a great career. We've had a few of those over the past few years.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Yobogoya! said:

 

McD and Beane were a package deal from the get go. They're like peas in a pod. 

 

The number of scheme incompatible players we've brought in during their tenure truly baffles the mind. Few GM/HC combos should be as aligned as these two. 

 

You could almost make the argument Whaley brought in better fits for McD before he was given the boot. Including: two all-pro safeties, an all pro CB, an all pro LB and a pro bowl LT. Yeesh. 

 

But yet they lead the NFL in net point differential by a wide margin over a 3 year span.  Let that sink in for a minute.  All of these terrible picks and players and yet they have been the best team in the NFL by a wide margin over a 3 year period.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Yobogoya! said:

 

McD and Beane were a package deal from the get go. They're like peas in a pod. 

 

The number of scheme incompatible players we've brought in during their tenure truly baffles the mind. Few GM/HC combos should be as aligned as these two. 

 

You could almost make the argument Whaley brought in better fits for McD before he was given the boot. Including: two all-pro safeties, an all pro CB, an all pro LB and a pro bowl LT. Yeesh. 

Take it one step further. Dorsey a panther. 
 

they’re panicking 

 

what a clown show

Posted
Just now, Success said:

 

I agree w/ this.  I feel like there are certain guys who have the talent to play here, but because of some special "quality" they need to have or something, they just can't gain enough favor w/ the coaches to get playing time.

 

It wouldn't surprise me at all to see Elam go somewhere else and have a great career. We've had a few of those over the past few years.

 

 

McCloud seems like the latest example...first in Pittsburgh and now in SF.  They seem to have no issues with him returning punts and being their 3rd/4th WR with as much talent as they have.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, balln said:

If Kincaid doesn’t look close to elite by the end of this year. I want a new GM. 
 

thsi franchise demise - too loyal to process guys . Bad contracts to aging vets, mediocre players. And really bad restructuring 

Kincaid already looks good. Move on from Knox he's a bum Kincaid the real deal.

  • Agree 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Big Turk said:

 

But yet they lead the NFL in net point differential by a wide margin over a 3 year span.  Let that sink in for a minute.  All of these terrible picks and players and yet they have been the best team in the NFL by a wide margin over a 3 year period.  

All because of the monster they have playing at QB. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Big Turk said:

 

But yet they lead the NFL in net point differential by a wide margin over a 3 year span.  Let that sink in for a minute.  All of these terrible picks and players and yet they have been the best team in the NFL by a wide margin over a 3 year period.  

 

Yes we've become very adept at dismantling bad teams and kicking them while they're down. 

 

But our record in close games (7 pts or less) during that span is not so much fun to talk about. I'm not saying they've built a bad team by any means. But I also think having Josh Allen means you have to grade them on something of a curve. 

 

Look at Belichick without Brady. Look at the start Payton's gotten off to without Drew Brees. 

 

It's more than fair to wonder if coaching and/or front office is holding this team back. Maybe it isn't. But it certainly isn't ludicrous to be suggesting it at this point. 

Posted
Just now, Billznut said:

All because of the monster they have playing at QB. 

Exactly it's not because McBean has been great it's because they drafted Josh Allen. Sometimes thats enough but often times you need to build around it and they have failed to do that properly IMO.

  • Agree 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Big Turk said:

 

But yet in the Ravens game he was so good in zone that someone who breaks down game film for a living asked if Elam was a natural zone corner because the technique he was playing with was so good and so fluid...he also baited Jackson into an INT in that game by reading his eyes when he was in Cover 2 and sinking back to the deep receiver to pick him off. 

 

Two weeks later he picked off Mahomes in the end zone when he was inside the 10 yard line about to score...it hasn't been all bad.

 

Where did it all go wrong?  We can't say he sucked at zone because a guy who breaks down film for a living showed multiple examples of him playing it perfectly.

 

These are the things I have never understood from McBeane. We never get value on our rookie contracts. 

 

Moss (3rd), injured then trade. 

Basham (2nd), traded no production

AJE (2nd), barely anything of value until his contract year. 

Oliver (1st), minimal snap count until he was extended. Great value on his new contract, bad value on his rookie deal. 

Kincaid (1st), one game with reasonable targets/involvement

Cook (2nd), is averaging like 13 touches per game

Shakir (4th), plays barely any snaps and sees barely any targets


Hell, here is something crazy, Zay Jones has turned himself into a reasonable NFL WR and drafted the same year as Tre White. 

Let these guys play, learn, and grow. They all might not work, but Jesus. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 2
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
Just now, Yobogoya! said:

 

Yes we've become very adept at dismantling bad teams and kicking them while they're down. 

 

But our record in close games (7 pts or less) during that span is not so much fun to talk about. I'm not saying they've built a bad team by any means. But I also think having Josh Allen means you have to grade them on something of a curve. 

 

Look at Belichick without Brady. Look at the start Payton's gotten off to without Drew Brees. 

 

It's more than fair to wonder if coaching and/or front office is holding this team back. Maybe it isn't. But it certainly isn't ludicrous to be suggesting it at this point. 

I mean it definitely is plain for everyone to see at this point.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Big Turk said:

 

But yet they lead the NFL in net point differential by a wide margin over a 3 year span.  Let that sink in for a minute.  All of these terrible picks and players and yet they have been the best team in the NFL by a wide margin over a 3 year period.  

Diggs only good move. And they’re filling w expensive free agents

Posted
7 minutes ago, Yobogoya! said:

 

McD and Beane were a package deal from the get go. They're like peas in a pod. 

 

The number of scheme incompatible players we've brought in during their tenure truly baffles the mind. Few GM/HC combos should be as aligned as these two. 

 

You could almost make the argument Whaley brought in better fits for McD before he was given the boot. Including: two all-pro safeties, an all pro CB, an all pro LB and a pro bowl LT. Yeesh. 

Or maybe McDermott was the one controlling that draft himself, let's not forget Sean started working with scouts when with the Eagles. 

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...