Jump to content

Who would you rather have?   

116 members have voted

  1. 1. Which Player?



Recommended Posts

Posted
54 minutes ago, Taro Nimbus said:

Devontae Adams or Brian Burns

Adams would be another acceptable trade IMO. However the reason why I didn’t include him is because he would cost more than Henry or Hopkins for this year. We would have to restructure a few more times to fit him. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Araiza Curse said:

Adams would be another acceptable trade IMO. However the reason why I didn’t include him is because he would cost more than Henry or Hopkins for this year. We would have to restructure a few more times to fit him. 

The good thing and the point of Adams would mean we have our 1a and 1b WRs moving forward for years in Adams and Diggs. 
 

how to get it under the cap? That’s the other story. But I wonder what including Davis in the trade would do. As well as another player or 2 that might be worth something to the Raiders. Maybe Elam, Epenesa

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, mrags said:

The good thing and the point of Adams would mean we have our 1a and 1b WRs moving forward for years in Adams and Diggs. 
 

how to get it under the cap? That’s the other story. But I wonder what including Davis in the trade would do. As well as another player or 2 that might be worth something to the Raiders. Maybe Elam, Epenesa

I can’t even imagine having Adams and Diggs on this team. Talk about unfair. But i agree, i do think 1B is something we need. But Henry might be the only RB i would want right now simply due to his physical command and to keep teams from playing 2 high safeties. I would be ecstatic with Hopkins or whatever decent. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Araiza Curse said:

I can’t even imagine having Adams and Diggs on this team. Talk about unfair. But i agree, i do think 1B is something we need. But Henry might be the only RB i would want right now simply due to his physical command and to keep teams from playing 2 high safeties. I would be ecstatic with Hopkins or whatever decent. 

I don’t think RB is the answer. I get your idea. But I want more Allen and less running the ball. Taking the ball out of your superstars hands is not a positive imo. He could drop back and decide to throw it or run it himself 100% of the time and I would be fine with it. 
 

I do not hate the idea that you propose. I don’t think they do it though. 
 

I’ll say this, if they lose this game this Thursday against the Bucs, they might as well be sellers and not buyers. 

Posted (edited)

Derrick Henry is too old. We’d get a year and a half of high production at most until he inevitably breaks down. Give me Hopkins who’s route running ability will allow him to age gracefully.

 

Edit: I wouldn’t complain about either

Edited by ChronicAndKnuckles
Posted

Probably neither. This team is not winning a SB this year. Those dreams died in London and Beane knows it. It’ll be the Swiftie Bowl. With that in mind, I would want to add a younger player that the Bills could sign long-term and let Davis walk. You gotta look at other teams draft disappointments that you think playing with a better QB could fix. Maybe someone like Dodson? 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
12 hours ago, Alphadawg7 said:

If being forced to choose between DHOP and Henry, I would have taken DHOP during the offseason, but now I would take Henry.  I don't know that DHOP changes the offense much, this is a complicated offense and it would be the 3rd offense in a year he has had to learn.  Takes time to build rapport and trust with a QB, so coming in mid season I don't know how much impact he makes compared to if he had been here the whole camp.

 

Henry coming in as a RB is a much easier integration and I think Henry impacts everyone else by opening up the field more too as they will have to respect the run. 

 

More importantly, I don't trust Dorsey to find ways to get DHOP the ball where as Henry you just hand it to him.  So I am leaning Henry, although I wouldn't be against DHOP either.  

Why not both?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)

If I can only pick one I'd go with Hopkins, but overall, my first choice is a DT-1/ nose tackle.  IMO that hurts them the most as also exposes Williams and Bernard more.  Getting a good DT-1 makes LP play much stronger in the process.

 

The Bills are a pass first team so don't see the value in Henry and will Allen really pass it much to Hopkins or is everythign still going to go through Diggs?

Edited by Ed_Formerly_of_Roch
Posted
15 hours ago, Alphadawg7 said:

More importantly, I don't trust Dorsey to find ways to get DHOP the ball where as Henry you just hand it to him.  So I am leaning Henry, although I wouldn't be against DHOP either.  

YES!!!  The beginning of another Dorsey sucks thread. I am all in.  He does suck!

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...