McD Press Conference Comments

[Dubie54]

50 minutes ago, Doc Brown said:

What would he say that would make you feel any better?

Well, what I don’t want to hear is “I wish I could tell you”. 
 

I’m not expecting him to throw anyone under the bus, but what we have seen from the Bills the past 3 weeks is unlike any 3 game stretch in years, and I’d like him to convey commitment and urgency to getting this thing turned around. 

[BeastMaster]

41 minutes ago, Mango said:

McD is a good coach. Let’s start there.

 

One of the hardest things to do in pro sports is get really close to winning a championship multiple times, lose, and keep the team. Teams just burn to hit, the margin for error is zero, and if you don’t win, everything is seen as a mistake. 
 

These things happen and are part of the coach/team lifecycle sometimes. Only posting this because a lot of the comments in this thread seem weirdly personal and aggressive towards McD. 

Aggressive? Maybe

 

Personal? Not a chance, my guy

 

Posters have the right to be pissed off at McD because he's not getting it done. It's one thing to lose to the top teams with the franchise QB...it's a whole different story when you get beat by Mac Jones.

 

And speaking of comments...the whole coach/team lifecycle thing comes across as nonsensical, excuse making. This team fails to meet expectations every season, and the talent has been there. The elite QB play has been there, and the defense has been there. 

 

It's the coaching that has let this team and Bills fans down. 

[LifeLongBillsFan]

3 hours ago, Ethan in Cleveland said:

I dont care and never cared what he says in press conferences. It's all media bull####. 

What matters is three weeks in a row he has not had his team prepared to play. 

To me that is very worrisome that he has lost the locker room(whatever that means).

To me it means this team knows they are being outcoached. Diggs knows Dorsey is a clown. 

Would be nice to have a reporter actual ask real questions.  But the press is just asked the same BS - they have the same scripted questions when we lose

if a reported came out and asked these questions they would move let them

back to the PCs

 

[LeGOATski]

He's been talking about finding a rhythm the last 3 games. It's something Dorsey really struggles with. You know they're getting into more specifics behind closed doors, but he's not going to lay all the details out for the media.

[Freddie's Dead]

I didn't hear the question I wanted an answer for. Why did you decline the defensive hold at the 1/2 yard line?  1st and goal from the 2 would have given you an extra down to burn clock or at least make Belicheat use his timeouts?

 

I get it. That's a micro question when everyone is focused on the macro. But that decision took away options for us to burn clock. 

[Nelius]

I doubt he provided many details but has anything else come to light on his choice to sit Dorian? Not sure how I feel about him putting players in the dog house, while simultaneously losing to a weak division opponent with the house maybe starting to catch on fire, unless he did something terrible. All seems a bit much.

[Doc Brown]

13 minutes ago, Freddie's Dead said:

I didn't hear the question I wanted an answer for. Why did you decline the defensive hold at the 1/2 yard line?  1st and goal from the 2 would have given you an extra down to burn clock or at least make Belicheat use his timeouts?

 

I get it. That's a micro question when everyone is focused on the macro. But that decision took away options for us to burn clock. 

That's because it would've been a really stupid question as we needed to make sure we scored a touchdown to take the lead.  You take 2nd and goal from the 1/2 yard line over first and goal from the two every time.  

[GoBills808]

3 minutes ago, Doc Brown said:

That's because it would've been a really stupid question as we needed to make sure we scored a touchdown to take the lead.  You take 2nd and goal from the 1/2 yard line over first and goal from the two every time.  

I don't think it's that stupid

 

In fact I would wager EV of first down from the 2 is higher than 2nd down from the .5 

[Buffalo Ballin]

There is nothing he can say.

 

If Coach McDermott said "We're banged up on defense so Josh Allen and Stefon Diggs all day with some sprinkles of James Cook, Khalil Shakir, and Dalton Kincaid."

As he leaves the podium, he heads back to the mic: "And oh yeah, Von Miller is toast y'all. Kthnxbye."

 

What would you be thinking?

 

 

[Doc Brown]

11 minutes ago, GoBills808 said:

I don't think it's that stupid

 

In fact I would wager EV of first down from the 2 is higher than 2nd down from the .5 

Give me three opportunities for a QB sneak from Allen to take the lead from a half yard out every time.

[Buffalo Barbarian]

5 hours ago, vincec said:

Not good. He’s sounding like Chan Gailey…

 

I suspect the last thing the players want to hear when things are off the rails is that the coach has no idea how to fix it.

 

Let's bring back Chan as OC, he made Fitz and Johnson look great.

 

 

[billsfan89]

4 hours ago, DabillsDaBillsDaBills said:

 

While that is technically true I feel like it doesn't tell the whole story. 

 

The only turnover by our offense turned into a 1st down for the Patriots from our 45 yard line. We allowed them to slice through our defense for a TD. 

 

The long punt return gave the Patriots a 1st down on our 46 yard line. Our DEF got shredded and let them drive down to the 6 yard line before settling for a 24 yard FG. 

 

Those were NOT good defensive drives, even when you account for the short fields. 

To be add more context the INT put the defense right back out on the field after the first offensive play. The defense holds the Pats to a field goal on the first drive, a not great but far from tragic start only to get put back out on the field having to defend a short field caused by an INT.

 

The defense should have been able to close the game out but the offense and special teams put them on short fields in the first half

[Dr.Sack]

3 hours ago, Freddie's Dead said:

I didn't hear the question I wanted an answer for. Why did you decline the defensive hold at the 1/2 yard line?  1st and goal from the 2 would have given you an extra down to burn clock or at least make Belicheat use his timeouts?

 

I get it. That's a micro question when everyone is focused on the macro. But that decision took away options for us to burn clock. 

This a good point. I think if Bass had made that one FG and you were a FG wins, then you do burn clock. Being that you were down 18-22 you a zero margin for error, and scoring a TD was the right decision, regardless of clock. And you prefer a 2nd and goal from the 1’ line. 

15 minutes ago, billsfan89 said:

To be add more context the INT put the defense right back out on the field after the first offensive play. The defense holds the Pats to a field goal on the first drive, a not great but far from tragic start only to get put back out on the field having to defend a short field caused by an INT.

 

The defense should have been able to close the game out but the offense and special teams put them on short fields in the first half

The Offense needs to score more than 25 to win if the D and ST get rolled. 

Edited October 23, 2023 by Dr.Sack

[JerseyBills]

Hopefully starting next week they rurn it around.  I'm very concerned but not in panic mode yet but will be if the they look anemic again 

[Since1981]

4 hours ago, LifeLongBillsFan said:

Would be nice to have a reporter actual ask real questions.  But the press is just asked the same BS - they have the same scripted questions when we lose

if a reported came out and asked these questions they would move let them

back to the PCs

The local press functionally can’t ask tough questions because if they do, they lose access to players/staff in retribution. It’s why only national media can be aggressive. 

[UKBillFan]

1 hour ago, Dr.Sack said:

This a good point. I think if Bass had made that one FG and you were a FG wins, then you do burn clock. Being that you were down 18-22 you a zero margin for error, and scoring a TD was the right decision, regardless of clock. And you prefer a 2nd and goal from the 1’ line. 

The Offense needs to score more than 25 to win if the D and ST get rolled. 

Yesterday was the first time the Pats had scored over 20 all season. If the D had kept them to the mean, the Bills would have won. The Eagles would have won scoring 21, the Dolphins 18, the Jets 16, the Cowboys 4(!), the Saints 1(!!), the Raiders 18. In reality, the Eagles scored the same number of points as the Bills did yesterday, the Dolphins one less and the Raiders four less. Even with a weakened defense, 25 on offense should have been enough.

 

[HoofHearted]

6 hours ago, DabillsDaBillsDaBills said:

 

That's the point I'm trying to make.

 

McD took a generic question about slow starts and turned it exclusively into an offense issue. He completely ignored his defense's slow starts to games this season (and this game in particular). He's scape-goating the offense when HIS defense was a complete train wreck from the opening whistle. 

The question was specifically about the offense. So yes, his answer was also specifically about the offense. Before questions even started he pointed out all the flaws in the defense yesterday and said that it all starts with him. I get people are upset, but just making up narratives to fit your agendas is odd.

[Herb]

9 hours ago, strive_for_five_guy said:

Do you really think he’s going to call out Dorsey and/or the players in a press conference?  THAT will be the fastest way for him to lose the locker room, not covering for people.  McD is a process guy, so whatever problems they’re having, his foundational belief is that they need to work that much harder this week to fix the issues, versus something he says in a press conference actually fixing the issues.

 

For instance, the OL has looked horrible recently, so yea he could point that out in a press conference, but it’s going to potentially alienate guys on the team, look to some like he’s deflecting the blame, etc.  The best way to calm the critics will be to start winning again.

Until we lose again in the playoffs,  due to more conservative short-sighted and nonsensical situational football decisions; like not burning clock before their last touchdown.

[Mango]

6 hours ago, BeastMaster said:

Aggressive? Maybe

 

Personal? Not a chance, my guy

 

Posters have the right to be pissed off at McD because he's not getting it done. It's one thing to lose to the top teams with the franchise QB...it's a whole different story when you get beat by Mac Jones.

 

And speaking of comments...the whole coach/team lifecycle thing comes across as nonsensical, excuse making. This team fails to meet expectations every season, and the talent has been there. The elite QB play has been there, and the defense has been there. 

 

It's the coaching that has let this team and Bills fans down. 

It’s not nonsense. This happens in all sorts of sports all the time. Teams whose legitimate expectations are to win a Super Bowl, who get close over and over again without winning, often burn hot, flame out, and staffs get replaced. 

When the margin for error for teams is win the Super Bowl or you fail, and you are constantly operating in a space where you’re always falling short. Teams rack up years of negative credit while being very good; but the “bad credit” adds up and things fall apart. 

 

This is one of the most impressive parts of guys like Harbaugh and Carroll. It’s really hard to be very good for a long time without burnout. You rarely see it elsewhere because athletes graduate and rotate out. But it’s real. 

[HOUSE]

The answer is simple. After 3 years and multiple changes to the OL, the Bills can not consistently run the football.