col_forbin Posted June 6, 2005 Posted June 6, 2005 Quick question?...... If the theory is correct, why wouldn't we be able to see below her waist then also.
zow2 Posted June 6, 2005 Posted June 6, 2005 Great pic. I love this quote by someone on the message board below her pic. Kinda' sick but struck me as funny.... -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I would bury my wife in the yard for Alba if I thought for a minute that A: She would come anywhere near me and B: she wasn't vapidly empty-headed. Posted: at June 6, 2005 04:34 AM --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
buffaloboyinATL Posted June 6, 2005 Posted June 6, 2005 NOT SAFE FOR WORK! Link And you're welcome. 351970[/snapback] Thank you. She looks fantastic. (pun intended)
MattyT Posted June 6, 2005 Posted June 6, 2005 Great pic. I love this quote by someone on the message board below her pic. Kinda' sick but struck me as funny.... -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I would bury my wife in the yard for Alba if I thought for a minute that A: She would come anywhere near me and B: she wasn't vapidly empty-headed. Posted: at June 6, 2005 04:34 AM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 352132[/snapback] Really tugs at the heartstrings doesn't it?
The Riddler Posted June 6, 2005 Posted June 6, 2005 wow....its great to see a female in hollywood that still actually eats food!
Beerball Posted June 6, 2005 Posted June 6, 2005 Quick question?...... If the theory is correct, why wouldn't we be able to see below her waist then also. 352026[/snapback] What theory am I missing?
slothrop Posted June 6, 2005 Posted June 6, 2005 Great pic. I love this quote by someone on the message board below her pic. Kinda' sick but struck me as funny.... -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I would bury my wife in the yard for Alba if I thought for a minute that A: She would come anywhere near me and B: she wasn't vapidly empty-headed. Posted: at June 6, 2005 04:34 AM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 352132[/snapback] I would not be so picky - I would not need requirement "B."
col_forbin Posted June 6, 2005 Posted June 6, 2005 What theory am I missing? 352154[/snapback] The theory that the material she was wearing was not see thru until the flash of the cameras hit it.
MattyT Posted June 6, 2005 Posted June 6, 2005 The theory that the material she was wearing was not see thru until the flash of the cameras hit it. 352217[/snapback] This is also known as the "Sheer" Genius Theory.
Beerball Posted June 6, 2005 Posted June 6, 2005 The theory that the material she was wearing was not see thru until the flash of the cameras hit it. 352217[/snapback] Chit, I had to go back and look again. I didn't realize there was any text the first time around.
col_forbin Posted June 6, 2005 Posted June 6, 2005 Chit, I had to go back and look again. I didn't realize there was any text the first time around. 352321[/snapback] No problem, I noticed it after a buddy and myself were staring it at it like this for twenty minutes
MadBuffaloDisease Posted June 6, 2005 Posted June 6, 2005 She stopped sleeping her way to the top AND doing nude scenes? ;doh; Dang, forget about seeing HER in anything more...except for maybe Playboy.
Buffal0 Bill5 Posted June 7, 2005 Posted June 7, 2005 They should market that material to more unsuspecting broads.
jester43 Posted June 7, 2005 Posted June 7, 2005 i'm not really sure who she is, but she looks nice in that dress.
Recommended Posts