Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, BBFL said:

Well this’ll make all the armchair GMs puff their chest. 
 

Half the board’s been saying this 😂

 

Well Simms has not been invited to be a GM so in this case he is in like company but see poll (and polls often lie) on football experience.

 

Speaking of polls I got contacted by Washington Team Football if changes made would it make me buy season tickets and if not what could they do to encourage me?

I said no not enough and the change I would want them to make would be to bring back Snyder to Management group.

I do not think I will be getting any more calls.

Evidently person got number from Director of Group Sales who contacted me about buying tickets for Bills / WTF game.

 

 

I need to start preparing for Halloween.  When I bought my foreclosed house almost 30 years ago I found a Washington Jersey used as a rag.  I cleaned it up intended to donate it to charity but never got around to it.  One Halloween I decided to hang a scarecrow dummy from a tree near driveway entrance and used jersey on it.

Posted
33 minutes ago, Ethan in Cleveland said:

The issue is not Davis. The issue is lack of production from the slot pass catcher whoever that is. 

Davis is a home run threat with big YPC. 

They need a true underneath threat to force the Linebackers and corners to play the short zone. That leaves Davis to carve up the safeties like he did against KC in the playoff game. 

 

To your point more generally, after six seasons of Beane and Seven of McD, they're still unsettled offensively.  

 

Honestly, I don't know how there isn't more heat on McBeane for that.  

 

 

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 hour ago, dave mcbride said:

You’re focusing on numbers rather than his McD'sinability to separate coach the offense properly, his shaky hands questionable command of anything related to the offense, and the fact that his numbers are W-L record is mostly a product of the most talented QB in the league throwing to him because he’s (unfortunately) the second option.

 

Food for thought.  

 

It's obviously not true only for Davis.  

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, dave mcbride said:

You’re focusing on numbers rather than his inability to separate, his shaky hands, and the fact that his numbers are mostly a product of the most talented QB in the league throwing to him because he’s (unfortunately) the second option.

 

It's like how a lot of Bills fans thought we made a mistake letting Isaiah Hodgins go last year because he had decent production for the Giants. How's that looking now? Targets and catches have to go somewhere. The #2 passing target in one of the most high volume passing offenses in the league with an elite QB is ALWAYS going to get 800-900 yards. Pointing to Davis's pure volume numbers is a crutch for people who want to avoid talking about his actual capabilities as a player.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 7
Posted

We need another guy that gets open reliably, and quickly, outside of Diggs. 
 

Since we do not have that currently, our “WR2” being a down the field threat that does not uncover quickly, is a massive problem for consistency in the offense.  
 

Whether that’s a shot at Gabe is up to however anyone wants to perceive it. 
 

Me, personally, I’d like my WR2 to be a guy who can move the chains reliably by getting open quickly.  That feels like a skill set, in a heavy pass offense, that should be required for the guy who’s on the field for a majority of snaps. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
29 minutes ago, PBF81 said:

 

It should give pause to the Beane supporters.  

 

 

 

And as if they're all identical on every team.  

 

 

Then quit using the termZ

52 minutes ago, Richard Noggin said:

 

Eh? Big Baller Beane is a solid GM, an excellent communicator, and all around likeable dude. But he is NOT someone who intimidates or kicks anyone's ass (physically). 

You know this how?

Posted
1 hour ago, BillsFan130 said:

But if we just look at “stats “, we also have to look deeper into the full picture 

 

How many targets he gets? And from that what’s his catch percentage? Drops? Contested catch rate? QB rating when targeting him?

 

Those numbers ^ were horrible for Gabe last year, and I’m guessing they aren’t great this year. (Maybe QB rating is ok as of this point)

Except they are great this year. I can’t find the contested catch rate but his catch percentage (70%) drop rate (6.7%) yards per catch (16.2) and passer rating when targeted (119.6) are all excellent. 60 second google search.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, BigDingus said:

What does "not a number 2" even mean anymore?

 

Do you really mean he's not a number 1 playing the number 2 role like Jalen Waddle, Tee Higgins, Tyler Lockett or Devonta Smith?

 

What kind of production do you want out of your WR2? The vast majority of NFL teams would be thrilled to have a WR2 that puts up 800+ yards, 7 TD's & extends the field like Gabe does.

 

Even right now, he's ranked #27 in receiving yards (automatically putting him ahead of multiple #1's), tied for 4th place in TD's with 5 others (ahead of others like Jamar Chase, Amon-Ra St. Brown, Travis Kelce, Mike Evans, and many other WR1's, TE's, and RB's), and is only 61st in receptions. 

 

I'd say he's more than adequate as a WR2, with the only issue being he's not as big a threat in the short-intermediate game as we'd like.

Just because he’s putting up some numbers because we have Josh Allen and a productive offense at times doesn’t mean he’s the 27th best wr. I wouldn’t put him in the top 50 that’s for sure.

Posted

6, 8, or 10 years ago ................. Pats from 2014 to 2016 had one WR over 1,000 yards  and won 2 SB's.  Brady was king of the short passing game and knew how to use TE's and RB's in the passing game.  Chiefs didn't have a WR with over 1,000 yards last year ......... won the SB.  It isn't on Davis that this offense sputters sometimes.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

When Gabe had his all world game against the chiefs he was literally the number 4 receiver on the depth chart behind Diggs, Beas, and Sanders.


Since Gabe has been given his opportunity as a number 2 he just isn’t that he’s more a 3rd or 4th receiver option. 

 

Until we get more consistency from Wr2 it’s going to hold this offense back. 

Chris is saying things to the national audience that we’ve discussed here for two years. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
Just now, Maine-iac said:

So why aren't people crying  about the TE's?


Some are. Mostly about Knox’s contract being way too large compared to his usage/productivity. But also about the lack of Kincaid usage: for example, just vs. the Giants Diggs had only 3 fewer targets than Kincaid has gotten all season. 

Posted (edited)

 

5 minutes ago, JohnBonhamRocks said:


Some are. Mostly about Knox’s contract being way too large compared to his usage/productivity. But also about the lack of Kincaid usage: for example, just vs. the Giants Diggs had only 3 fewer targets than Kincaid has gotten all season. 

I'm with them.  Like I've already said, I don't think we have a Davis at #2 problem.  We have a "don't use our other weapons" problem.  Beyond the TE position I've also wondered why our screen game is for the most part horrendous.  At least our run game is improved.  Now if they'd just lean on it a little more.

Edited by Maine-iac
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
54 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

 

It's like how a lot of Bills fans thought we made a mistake letting Isaiah Hodgins go last year because he had decent production for the Giants. How's that looking now? Targets and catches have to go somewhere. The #2 passing target in one of the most high volume passing offenses in the league with an elite QB is ALWAYS going to get 800-900 yards. Pointing to Davis's pure volume numbers is a crutch for people who want to avoid talking about his actual capabilities as a player.

 

 

And now the people who have been defending Gabe as a #2 are reacting to his continued inconsistency by claiming that they just need a better slot receiver.  

 

Ignoring the fact that the majority of the teams that the Bills are trying to get thru to win a SB have second options that can succeed at any of the WR positions.

 

It's a process getting some of these people to "see the forest for the trees".

Edited by BADOLBILZ
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
Posted

I'm not making a direct comment on Davis one way or the other here, but if he weren't on this team right now the offense would not be nearly as good.  

 

Whether that would befall Beane, McD, or whomever is another related discussion.  But if Davis were to get injured for the season this week, the offense would notice.  

 

 

Posted
49 minutes ago, SCBills said:

We need another guy that gets open reliably, and quickly, outside of Diggs. 
 

Since we do not have that currently, our “WR2” being a down the field threat that does not uncover quickly, is a massive problem for consistency in the offense.  
 

Whether that’s a shot at Gabe is up to however anyone wants to perceive it. 
 

Me, personally, I’d like my WR2 to be a guy who can move the chains reliably by getting open quickly.  That feels like a skill set, in a heavy pass offense, that should be required for the guy who’s on the field for a majority of snaps. 

AMEN! Very well stated.

Posted
7 minutes ago, PBF81 said:

I'm not making a direct comment on Davis one way or the other here, but if he weren't on this team right now the offense would not be nearly as good.  

 

Whether that would befall Beane, McD, or whomever is another related discussion.  But if Davis were to get injured for the season this week, the offense would notice.  

 

 

That's true because he knows the offense and has chemistry with Josh. That doesn't make him a solid WR2. The Bills should have upgraded the WR2 position. Obviously, Kincaid isn't that guy. 

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...