Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

He is far better than Harty or sherfield but both of them play special teams and that's important

 

Harty was over hyped here by people wanting to pretend he was something special 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)

Seems like the biggest knock on Harty isnt with his play when he is actually on the field, but with how we are (or aren't) using him and his salary.

 

Those knocks are on Coaching and FO.

 

Harty, the player, so far seems more reliable in that I havent witnessed him making a bonehead play yet, and we're 6 games in. (McKenzine made it 17 plays last year)

 

He's likely an upgrade over McKenzie. $4.5M aint that much right now. Hopefully they can figure out how to use him more because so far I like what I've seen.

 

edit:

Just looked up McKenzie's contract. $1.2M. The $3.3M difference is worth it to not have the bonehead plays. You get what you pay for.

Edited by DrDawkinstein
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said:

Seems like the biggest knock on Harty isnt with his play when he is actually on the field, but with how we are (or aren't) using him and his salary.

 

Those knocks are on Coaching and FO.

 

Harty, the player, so far seems more reliable in that I havent witnessed him making a bonehead play yet, and we're 6 games in. (McKenzine made it 17 plays last year)

 

He's likely an upgrade over McKenzie. $4.5M aint that much right now. Hopefully they can figure out how to use him more because so far I like what I've seen.

 

edit:

Just looked up McKenzie's contract. $1.2M. The $3.3M difference is worth it to not have the bonehead plays. You get what you pay for.

Maybe this is fair. Maybe I'm putting too much on him for not getting on the field vs coaching.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, DrDawkinstein said:

Seems like the biggest knock on Harty isnt with his play when he is actually on the field, but with how we are (or aren't) using him and his salary.

Those knocks are on Coaching and FO.

 

Some truth there.  A number of people, however, have commented that he just doesn't look as fast as he did in 2021.

 

It's actually kind of puzzling that the Bills are using Diggs on some of the quick "out" routes and such that I thought would be going to Harty.  It makes me wonder what's going on in practice. 

 

I don't know how you'd tell if Harty is "more reliable" or not, when we're not seeing much of him.  He does have a drop, and it was a bad one. 

 

As far as contract, we're gonna have to agree to disagree about what's "not much".  When the team has like $1.8M in cap space and has injured players dropping like flies, an extra $3M cap space could come in mighty handy.

Edited by Beck Water
Posted

Our lack of usage of Harty is just annoying at this point.  He's faster, more fluid and has better hands than McKenzie but they only way we look to get him the ball is on poorly designed and easily diagnosed screen plays.  No way to scheme him some routes in space out of the slot?  Or use him as a deep threat to take the top off the defense.  Go back and watch his New Orleans film.  He can do these things.  He has big play potential that we seem unable to tap into.

Posted

McKenzie was terrible in a lot of key moments last season.

 

Harty just needs more opportunities. Beane brought in all these guys and Dorsey can’t figure out how to consistently use them. 

Posted

I hated the Harty signing and so many people told me I was clueless. 

3 hours ago, DrDawkinstein said:

Seems like the biggest knock on Harty isnt with his play when he is actually on the field, but with how we are (or aren't) using him and his salary.

 

Those knocks are on Coaching and FO.

 

Harty, the player, so far seems more reliable in that I havent witnessed him making a bonehead play yet, and we're 6 games in. (McKenzine made it 17 plays last year)

 

He's likely an upgrade over McKenzie. $4.5M aint that much right now. Hopefully they can figure out how to use him more because so far I like what I've seen.

 

edit:

Just looked up McKenzie's contract. $1.2M. The $3.3M difference is worth it to not have the bonehead plays. You get what you pay for.

Uhh the fumbled punt he should have let bounce into the end zone…

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, ngbills said:

 

Uhh the fumbled punt he should have let bounce into the end zone…

 

Yeah, I gotta give you/him that one. At least we didnt lose that fumble, but I wont make excuses.

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, TheyCallMeAndy said:

My bad, I thought he was released! 

 

He was released, but it turned out to just be a roster manipulation move at roster cutdown, so that they could get a guy onto IR eligible to return.  Resigned the next day, been returning punts and doing gadget plays for them.

 

5 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

Yeah, I gotta give you/him that one. At least we didnt lose that fumble, but I wont make excuses.

 

And the drop.....

Edited by Beck Water
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Beck Water said:

 

And the drop.....

 

I dont care about a drop. We dont want to go there with McKenzie either. I'm talking the real bonehead plays that McK specialized in.

 

I know you'll defend him until your keyboard breaks, but we're better off without him. Moving on.

 

Edited by DrDawkinstein
Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

I dont care about a drop. We dont want to go there with McKenzie either. I'm talking the real bonehead plays that McK specialized in.

 

I know you'll defend him until your keyboard breaks, but we're better off without him. Moving on.

 

 

I have no problem with the Bills moving on from McKenzie.  I have my receipts of what I've said on the subject (and in this thread).  McKenzie got his chance to show he could be a full-time slot receiver, and he didn't come through.  Next.

 

I do have a problem with labeling everything you can a "boneheaded play" from your departed whipping boy, and not even remembering the genuine gaffes Hardy has been observed to make in his limited time with the Bills.  It's illogical to label a guy who is really not seeing the field very much, and who has had mistakes when he does, "more reliable".  You don't care about a drop, but maybe you should.  Maybe the coaches do; maybe it reflects what he's doing in practice.

 

Can Harty be a better player?  Yes, he potentially does have a higher ceiling.  Better routes, better ball tracking ability.  He needs to prove he is able to keep that "best ability is availability" thing going on.  But mostly for whatever reason, he hasn't earned enough playing time to show what he is or can be here, one way or another.  So when you spend 3x as much money, on a guy who is on the field 60% less, and you only have $1.8M cap space, yeah, the best I can give it is "jury's still out".

Edited by Beck Water
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Beck Water said:

 

I have no problem with the Bills moving on from McKenzie.  I have my receipts of what I've said on the subject (and in this thread).  McKenzie got his chance to show he could be a full-time slot receiver, and he didn't come through.

 

I do have a problem with labeling everything you can a "boneheaded play" from your departed whipping boy, and not even remembering the genuine gaffes Hardy has been observed to make in his limited time with the Bills.  It's illogical to label a guy who is really not seeing the field very much, and who has had mistakes when he does, "more reliable".

 

Can Harty be a better player?  He potentially does have a higher ceiling.  He needs to prove he is able to keep that "best ability is availability" thing going on.  But mostly for whatever reason, he hasn't earned enough playing time to show what he is or can be here, one way or another.

 

I knew I'd be getting paragraphs from you on this. Cant dare criticize your boy.

 

Lil Bonehead is gone.

 

Moving on.

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...