Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
10 hours ago, MAJBobby said:

It matters To me not if you wish to make claims and not back them. 

 

From the horses mouth...

Quote

 

Allen explained the disparity this way.

“Throwing to the open guy and you know, he does a good job of getting open and making plays with the ball in his hands and when you have a receiver as talented as him and he’s your first read in a lot of concepts and he’s open, you can’t really pass him up,” Allen said.

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Doc Brown said:

We're objectively the third best offense in the league and the entire offense needs to be overhauled?  Talk about recency bias.

 

F8keWE9XcAAP1XX?format=jpg&name=large

It’s about scoring points. The Bills’ offense scored zero points through three quarters against the Giants’ average defense, following up on last week’s performance where they managed 7 points vs the Jags through three and a half quarters.  And we don’t even want to talk about their performance against the only other good defense they’ve faced…That’s three out of six games where the offense was objectively putrid.  Sorry, not good enough, no matter what the “offensive efficiency” stats say.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 3
Posted
20 minutes ago, mannc said:

It’s about scoring points. The Bills’ offense scored zero points through three quarters against the Giants’ average defense, following up on last week’s performance where they managed 7 points vs the Jags through three and a half quarters.  And we don’t even want to talk about their performance against the only other good defense they’ve faced…That’s three out of six games where the offense was objectively putrid.  Sorry, not good enough, no matter what the “offensive efficiency” stats say.

They're third in points

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
46 minutes ago, mannc said:

It’s about scoring points. The Bills’ offense scored zero points through three quarters against the Giants’ average defense, following up on last week’s performance where they managed 7 points vs the Jags through three and a half quarters.  And we don’t even want to talk about their performance against the only other good defense they’ve faced…That’s three out of six games where the offense was objectively putrid.  Sorry, not good enough, no matter what the “offensive efficiency” stats say.

 

It's about consistency. They have been way too feast and famine this year.

  • Agree 3
Posted
8 minutes ago, mannc said:

It’s about scoring points. The Bills’ offense scored zero points through three quarters against the Giants’ average defense, following up on last week’s performance where they managed 7 points vs the Jags through three and a half quarters.  And we don’t even want to talk about their performance against the only other good defense they’ve faced…That’s three out of six games where the offense was objectively putrid.  Sorry, not good enough, no matter what the “offensive efficiency” stats say.

Okay.  I'll guess I'll look at their offense in a vacuum like you are and pretend that every offense in the league doesn't go into a rut.  They had a bad first half in the Giants game with long plays that would've worked if the WR's could keep their feeting, a fumble by Davis, and a great play by the LB on the INT when Knox was open for the first down.  Bad half.  Whatever.  They weren't sharp and Martindale got the better of Dorsey.  However, how did they respond in the second half? 

 

First drive goes 17 plays for 89 yards and a touchdown taking 9:58 seconds off the clock.  They were incredibly proficient in the 3rd quarter and just happened to get the TD on the first play of the 4th quarter.  Second drive goes 12 plays for 75 yards for a TD taking 6:47 seconds off the clock.  Two TD drives taking up nearly 17 minutes is impressive.  Giants dared us to string long drives together in the second half and they responded.   Third drive Josh would've iced the game with a good throw and it was perfectly set up for him to make it.  I can't blame Dorsey on that although I'll nitpick in maybe you design that play to someone other than Knox who was dealing with a wrist injury and will never be known for having great hands.  The two missed field goals also didn't help.  

 

If they continue to be as inconsistent as they were over the next couple of games then I'll be concerned.  However, they were flawless against the Raiders and Dolphins so I'm not going to ignore those games so I can panic over the first half of the last two.

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
6 hours ago, Scott7975 said:

 

It's not once a week.  Receivers make hard catches all the time across every game.  Receivers aren't just paid to catch balls thrown to their chest. They are paid to make difficult catches as well.  Could the pass have been better?  Of course, but these receivers are paid and expected to catch the ones not perfect.  You don't watch enough football if you think that pass shouldn't have been caught.

 

kelc.thumb.png.160177a31b59ae37e2b5759b467da1a6.png

 

This pass was thrown low and way behind Kelce.  IOW Kelce was running away from this pass towards the left sideline.  Thats why you see that big patch of turf in the air from his slide to catch it.  This is what good receivers do every game.  They catch the not perfect pass.

 

 

 

Because of files size limits on this board I have to continue this in another post...

 

This is from the Jets game as I dont have a screen shot from last night but all 3 plays are similar.  This is what Knox does...

 

drop.thumb.png.ea77b1bc4ab705d2dd1e5bdeee72db57.png

 

He drops the damn football.

Should I post pictures of accurately thrown passes now?  

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 hours ago, GoBills808 said:

They're third in points

And yet in half their games this year, they have struggled mightily to score.

Posted
15 minutes ago, mannc said:

And yet in half their games this year, they have struggled mightily to score.

 

And not just score... they have struggled to even move the ball. It hasn't been in those games that they have been settling for 3s or stalling just outside the high red zone. They have been having to punt from their own territory in the last two weeks (week 1 they barely punted but they turned it over tons). 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted

I don't want to hear about DVOA stats or where the Bills "rank" this year.  The fact is, they have played 6 games this season and the offense has been bad in half of them.  It has resulted in two losses, and what really should have been a third loss on Sunday night.

 

The Bills will have a stretch of games where they roll and everything seems easy.  Then suddenly, the same problems start creeping up again:

-  Relying too much on Stefon Diggs, and nobody else stepping up in the passing game.

-  Getting away from the running game and becoming too one-dimensional.

 

 

It's either the coaches, or the players, or a little bit of both.

I'm not 100% sure where the problem lies.  But I'm getting tired of the fans who want to pretend there is no problem.  That tell us teams just go through funks and everything will be sorted out.  They ignored the warning signs last year, yelled at everyone else for being "negative" and were legitimately shocked when the Bills got an early exit from the playoffs. 

 

If things don't get fixed ASAP, this team won't be fighting Miami for the AFC East title in December.  They will be fighting for 2nd Place against the Jets, hoping Aaron Rodgers doesn't somehow comeback in Week 15, and crossing our fingers for a Wild Card spot.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 2
Posted

I am starting to worry a bit that Allen’s admitted lack of interest in film study is causing some of the presnap identification and protection issues we’re seeing.  Allen seems to be too often looking for answers after the ball is snapped, as opposed to beforehand.  That puts a ton of added pressure on the playcaller and the offense as a whole.

 

Sorry to be sacrilegious.  I’m not sure Dorsey bears all of the blame here.

Posted

Is there a place to see how the first drive of the first and second half have gone this season?  In my mind they have been horrible but I'm curious if they are as bad as I remember.  Do those drives reflect more on Dorsey than others as those drives are scripted with plenty of prep.

Posted
Just now, Coach Tuesday said:

I am starting to worry a bit that Allen’s admitted lack of interest in film study is causing some of the presnap identification and protection issues we’re seeing.  Allen seems to be too often looking for answers after the ball is snapped, as opposed to beforehand.  That puts a ton of added pressure on the playcaller and the offense as a whole.

 

Sorry to be sacrilegious.  I’m not sure Dorsey bears all of the blame here.

 

This. Allen misses a LOT of wide-open reads. I'm sure dorsey shares some of the blame, but the melon farmer needs to do better

 

Posted

First three drives against the Giants...

 

1. Stef diggs drop and gabe davis incompletion...which of those missed executions is on Dorsey there? 

2. Bills moving the ball down the field with ease, Gabe Davis fumbles in giants territory...that is somehow on Dorsey?

3. Drove the ball 40 yards down to the Giants 37 and then Diggs gets tackled 1 on 1 in the open field for no gain, Josh incomplete to Knox ends drive at the 37. Ok, maybe Dorsey should have called better plays there? Maybe it was good play design to get your Alpha WR 1 on 1 against a tiny DB and expecting him to get some YAC instead of tackled immediately? But I am sure everyone will jump on the latter part of this stalled drive instead of the big chunk play and the 10 yard run design and call that got them down inside Giants territory. 

Then to end the half we get an INT and missed FG. 

 

Second half we scored on all three possessions. 

 

Sometimes it is just hard to win in the NFL, and WE DID. Could offense have executed better? Hell yea, every offense in every game can execute better (except for a couple of Ken Dorsey called games where they were essentially perfect offensive performances, but yea, Dorsey cant run an offense). 

 

Fire Dorsey lol, some people just don't know ball...or at least don't understand the nuance of football.

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, PaattMaann said:

First three drives against the Giants...

 

1. Stef diggs drop and gabe davis incompletion...which of those missed executions is on Dorsey there? 

2. Bills moving the ball down the field with ease, Gabe Davis fumbles in giants territory...that is somehow on Dorsey?

3. Drove the ball 40 yards down to the Giants 37 and then Diggs gets tackled 1 on 1 in the open field for no gain, Josh incomplete to Knox ends drive at the 37. Ok, maybe Dorsey should have called better plays there? Maybe it was good play design to get your Alpha WR 1 on 1 against a tiny DB and expecting him to get some YAC instead of tackled immediately? But I am sure everyone will jump on the latter part of this stalled drive instead of the big chunk play and the 10 yard run design and call that got them down inside Giants territory. 

Then to end the half we get an INT and missed FG. 

 

Second half we scored on all three possessions. 

 

Sometimes it is just hard to win in the NFL, and WE DID. Could offense have executed better? Hell yea, every offense in every game can execute better (except for a couple of Ken Dorsey called games where they were essentially perfect offensive performances, but yea, Dorsey cant run an offense). 

 

Fire Dorsey lol, some people just don't know ball...or at least don't understand the nuance of football.

 

 

 

We didn't score on the third possession in the second half, we missed another FG. But that play to ice the game is not on Dorsey... he dialled a good play up. Allen threw it poorly and Knox couldn't reel it in (when he probably should have). I do have issue with the play calling on that series though. The easiest down there to find the roll out pass is 1st down BUT, it is a fair challenge, ultimately had they executed better then they'd have iced it anyway. 

 

It is also a fair challenge on the earlier drives - and execution flaws definitely hurt - on the throw outside to Diggs Josh always seems to throw those a bit high as well which means the receiver loses momentum while they secure the catch and makes the tackle for the DB easier. But just generally I think the playcalling in the first half was confused. It lacked rhythm, it liked coherence and yes - we made some plays - but I'm not sure what we were trying to establish. The blame is certainly not all on Dorsey, but he did not call a good first half IMO. 

  • Agree 1
Posted

My take is the Buffalo Bills just played a team against a former Buffalo offensive coordinator who knows their playbooks inside out. The play calls, the language, the nomenclature, they study film and the Giant's defense... as injury-depleted as they were...they knew exactly what the Bills offense was going to do as they were doing it.

 

If I can say one thing, that the offense got away from the 12, and 13 formations that they had run so well against Miami. But then, that might have been because Knox had a wrist injury and Dalton was in concussion protocol so they were down a bit with their TEs. 

 

Now, the hated NE Patriots are up next at NE. They currently have a bad offense, 31st in points scored, and 27th in yards. Their defense is 24th in points allowed, and 10th in yards allowed. 

 

My take is the Bills will find their footing outta the gate and destroy this bad team. Go Bills!

Posted
9 hours ago, Scott7975 said:

 

So stats pulled from an article I can't read but it was about the Chicago Bears with Justin Fields offense.  Good model lol.  Also stat show 17% of the time.  Pretty low amount.  I'm sure there is a reason for that.  Probably because when you are at the half yardline its not a good idea to hand the ball off from pistol formation 6+ yards back.  Especially when your QB is almost automatic in that situation.  Dorsey was trying to get cute and it was a bad call.  If they got a TD off that play I still would have said it was a bad call.

 

 

You want to push your anti Dorsey narrative so badly that you are willing to blindly ignore that the TD percentage at the goal line out of the shotgun is more than otherwise.

 

I get it. You don't like Dorsey and you will not let facts get in the way.

 

God bless.

  • Disagree 1
Posted

The offensive line is better. The running game is better. In my opinion, we have a better receiver group, yet the offense is regressing. I don't need stats and a bunch of number narratives to tell me otherwise. My eyes see what they see, and it's not good. The Bills were recently good at nationally televised games. They stunk in all 3 this year. 

  • Eyeroll 2
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Fleezoid said:

The offensive line is better. The running game is better. In my opinion, we have a better receiver group, yet the offense is regressing. I don't need stats and a bunch of number narratives to tell me otherwise. My eyes see what they see, and it's not good. The Bills were recently good at nationally televised games. They stunk in all 3 this year. 

They are regressing by improving in both efficiency and scoring over last year and 2021, because you just know it and say so. Compelling 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...