Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)


https://denversports.com/2108345/report-broncos-indeed-open-for-business-on-jeudy-sutton-more/

 

One day after Denver Broncos head coach Sean Payton said the team isn’t looking to make any more trades, an ESPN report is disputing that.

Dan Graziano wrote on Wednesday that “it feels pretty obvious from talking to teams around the league the 1-4 Broncos are open for business.”
That’s a direct contradiction to Payton, who said on Tuesday that Denver is “not looking to do business with any of our players.”
 

Payton’s answer felt like a smokescreen, and based on what Graziano is reporting, it indeed could’ve been. Obviously, if the Broncos somehow stun the Chiefs on Thursday night, things could change. But that feels unlikely, and at 1-5, Denver would be full-on sellers at the Halloween trade deadline.
 

Graziano also notes the Broncos are “not interested in parting with star cornerback Pat Surtain II,” because the team views him as a “building block” for the future.
Finally, he states the obvious that no one is trading for QB Russell Wilson’s lucrative contract.

It makes sense on Surtain. He’s only in this third year and still on a rookie deal through next season, while the Broncos will also pick up his fifth-year option eventually.

 

But Graziano mentions “prominent names” could also come up in trade speculation. He doesn’t get specific, but it’s not hard to figure it out. In addition to Sutton and Jeudy, guys like Justin Simmons, Garett Bolles and Frank Clark could be on the move.
 

This is probably the latest of many reports about what Denver could do between now and Oct. 31, but it sounds like Jeudy and Sutton’s days in orange and blue may be numbered. Stay tuned.

 

 



1.) Would you want the Bills to acquire him?


2.) What would be your offer to Denver? 
 

 

Edited by Warriorspikes51
  • Thank you (+1) 1
  • Dislike 2
  • Warriorspikes51 changed the title to Jerry Jeudy is Available (?) Do you want him & What is your offer?
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said:


https://denversports.com/2108345/report-broncos-indeed-open-for-business-on-jeudy-sutton-more/

 

One day after Denver Broncos head coach Sean Payton said the team isn’t looking to make any more trades, an ESPN report is disputing that.

Dan Graziano wrote on Wednesday that “it feels pretty obvious from talking to teams around the league the 1-4 Broncos are open for business.”
That’s a direct contradiction to Payton, who said on Tuesday that Denver is “not looking to do business with any of our players.”
 

Payton’s answer felt like a smokescreen, and based on what Graziano is reporting, it indeed could’ve been. Obviously, if the Broncos somehow stun the Chiefs on Thursday night, things could change. But that feels unlikely, and at 1-5, Denver would be full-on sellers at the Halloween trade deadline.
 

Graziano also notes the Broncos are “not interested in parting with star cornerback Pat Surtain II,” because the team views him as a “building block” for the future.
Finally, he states the obvious that no one is trading for QB Russell Wilson’s lucrative contract.

It makes sense on Surtain. He’s only in this third year and still on a rookie deal through next season, while the Broncos will also pick up his fifth-year option eventually.

 

But Graziano mentions “prominent names” could also come up in trade speculation. He doesn’t get specific, but it’s not hard to figure it out. In addition to Sutton and Jeudy, guys like Justin Simmons, Garett Bolles and Frank Clark could be on the move.
 

This is probably the latest of many reports about what Denver could do between now and Oct. 31, but it sounds like Jeudy and Sutton’s days in orange and blue may be numbered. Stay tuned.

 

 



1.) Would you want the Bills to acquire him?


2.) What would be your offer to Denver? 
 

 

Would rather take Sutton. Would give a 2nd round pick in a second. 

Edited by FireChans
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Vomit 1
  • Disagree 8
  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 3
  • Dislike 3
Posted

I don't.  It's not a need. And we HAVE needs.

 

Dorsey needs to start using the guys we have better.  Sherfield, Harty & Kincaid can all play - we need to start spreading the ball around more

 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Disagree 1
  • Agree 16
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Success said:

I don't.  It's not a need. And we HAVE needs.

 

Dorsey needs to start using the guys we have better.  Sherfield, Harty & Kincaid can all play - we need to start spreading the ball around more

 

 

Fair point and it's likely we don't add anyone on offense.  Although, I would really like Mecole Hardman for a late round pick.  Harty is quick, Hardman is blazing fast. We could really use some speed

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 3
Posted
4 minutes ago, Success said:

I don't.  It's not a need. And we HAVE needs.

 

Dorsey needs to start using the guys we have better.  Sherfield, Harty & Kincaid can all play - we need to start spreading the ball around more

 

Sherfield cannot play. Not sure Harty can play either. 
 

We need another guy who can get open and threaten defenses. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Disagree 8
  • Agree 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
  • Dislike 1
Posted

The extra 3rd rounder we have would be about as high of a pick as I’d be willing to give up. Maybe add on a late rounder or an incentive if he finishes with so many TDs or if we win a SB 

7 minutes ago, Success said:

I don't.  It's not a need. And we HAVE needs.

 

Dorsey needs to start using the guys we have better.  Sherfield, Harty & Kincaid can all play - we need to start spreading the ball around more

 

Hard to argue this point. Although I think Harty is pretty much useless and Sherfield isn’t that good. Kincaid might be but it appears Dorsey has an issue with using TEs as weapons and not as blockers. 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
29 minutes ago, Success said:

I don't.  It's not a need. And we HAVE needs.

 

Dorsey needs to start using the guys we have better.  Sherfield, Harty & Kincaid can all play - we need to start spreading the ball around more

 

If we were actually serious about getting Hopkins but his price was too high, then wouldn't that mean Beane and the team are open to the idea that we could use another WR threat?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
28 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said:

 

Fair point and it's likely we don't add anyone on offense.  Although, I would really like Mecole Hardman for a late round pick.  Harty is quick, Hardman is blazing fast. We could really use some speed

 

I'd like Hardman too but doubt Jets are gonna make any trades with Bills.

  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Warcodered said:

If we were actually serious about getting Hopkins but his price was too high, then wouldn't that mean Beane and the team are open to the idea that we could use another WR threat?

 

I can't really disagree w/ that. But circumstances today are just different.

 

Davis is playing pretty well, and Sherfield has made the most of the few moments he has had.  Meanwhile, we lost 3 of our best players on D.  

 

The offense is a very minor concern right now, despite the Jags game, which was just all kinds of weirdness anyway.  I would think if we're going to trade and give up valuable capital from either the draft or the roster, it would be to bolster positions like LB or CB, where we're now thin.

 

  • Agree 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Success said:

 

I can't really disagree w/ that. But circumstances today are just different.

 

Davis is playing pretty well, and Sherfield has made the most of the few moments he has had.  Meanwhile, we lost 3 of our best players on D.  

 

The offense is a very minor concern right now, despite the Jags game, which was just all kinds of weirdness anyway.  I would think if we're going to trade and give up valuable capital from either the draft or the roster, it would be to bolster positions like LB or CB, where we're now thin.

 


We’re certainly in a strange spot where offense is the least of our concerns, yet is the reason we lost two games. 
 

Im not saying that condescendingly.. I agree.   However, facts are facts, and even with all the injuries, our defense did what was needed for us to (easily) beat Jacksonville, if not for our second horrible offensive performance of the year. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

Yes in a heartbeat. Knox is useless as a receiving threat. Kincaid is learning. We need that slot guy that beasely used to be. The offense would be unstoppable and the d line would eat with leads. 
 

it’s time for big baller beane to push his chips in and go for a title. 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
Posted
50 minutes ago, Success said:

I don't.  It's not a need. And we HAVE needs.

 

Dorsey needs to start using the guys we have better.  Sherfield, Harty & Kincaid can all play - we need to start spreading the ball around more

 

 

I think it would be a nice get but I also agree with you.  We have guys.  Josh needs to do better recognizing the open guy getting him the ball.  Dorsey needs to do better.  Guys need to stop getting caught up in the same area of the field.  Guys also need to do better on must have catches.  I think we have the guys. Everyone just needs to do better.

On the flipsides, we have obvious needs on the defensive side of the ball now.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, SCBills said:


We’re certainly in a strange spot where offense is the least of our concerns, yet is the reason we lost two games. 
 

Im not saying that condescendingly.. I agree.   However, facts are facts, and even with all the injuries, our defense did what was needed for us to (easily) beat Jacksonville, if not for our second horrible offensive performance of the year. 

 

I can't disagree w/ that, either!  Our O has been kind of schizophrenic.

 

The talent is there, imo.  I just really don't know about Dorsey, still.  I saw what Jax was doing w/ their run game - I'm not an x's and o's guy, but it just seemed more creative than what we do.  Unpredictable.

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...