Benford (shoulder) questionable ??!!!

[Italian Bills]

6 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

The elevation of Ingram suggests to me rhat Benford is doubtful. 

 

Jackson, Elam, Lewis, Ingram. 

 

 

How you see that ? Could we be in trouble ? 

[GunnerBill]

2 minutes ago, Italian Bills said:

How you see that ? Could we be in trouble ? 

 

Jackson and Elam as corners 3 and 4 is better depth than most teams have. But they are 3 and 4 for a reason, so it isn't nothing.... 

 

I am not a lover of the Jags wideouts though. So I think we will survive.

[Italian Bills]

6 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Jackson and Elam as corners 3 and 4 is better depth than most teams have. But they are 3 and 4 for a reason, so it isn't nothing.... 

 

I am not a lover of the Jags wideouts though. So I think we will survive.

Maybe the answer will have to be our offense after all …. or keep the safeties a lil more in check than usual, just a little closer. 

[Augie]

9 hours ago, Royale with Cheese said:

It looked like it went out a little.  Probably put back in place on the sideline and good enough to go back in.  But from people I know that have this happen, once the adrenaline wears off and the next few days is bad.

 

But I’ve never had it.

 

Was it dislocated? A stinger? I’m not sure if I ever heard exactly what the injury was. I will say I was surprised to see him back out there because it did NOT look good. 

[Scott7975]

3 hours ago, 1ManRaid said:

 

Serious question...why do you ONLY ever interact with your own threads?  You just post an occasional pointless random thought thread, reply to it 0-3 times before it dies, then disappear for a while until another random thought emerges, cycle continues.

 

It's starting to feel like some weird social experiment in the way you refuse to engage with others' topics, almost as if actual honest engagement with fellow fans isn't your purpose here.

I’ll hang up and listen. 

[brianb386]

3 hours ago, Italian Bills said:

Thanks for the “support” bro, this is not the reason.  
 

The time i can enjoy this board is limited because the many obligations that fill every day, family, job, etc and having 6 hours difference with you, doesn’t help. 
 

I can read you when i go to bed, 30/40 minutes, maybe more on Sunday and most of the times, all the threads have something like tens of replies already, so writing my opinion would probably be irrelevant. 
 

Of course I don’t understand why this must annoying some people.. 

 

Oh, just to be clear: i’m italian, i live here and i’m an avid bills fan since 1989, when we could watch on tv just the post season games, but this doesn’t stop me to come there in Buffalo in the 1995 when i was 24 years old and enjoy Seahawks@Bills (21-27). 
 

I hope this can be enough to 1ManRaid to understand who k am. 

I am not sure why you are needing to justify your activity here, but I say keep doing your thing. Go Bills

[Italian Bills]

Just now, brianb386 said:

I am not sure why you are needing to justify your activity here, but I say keep doing your thing. Go Bills

It wasn’t my intent to justify my beahviour here, it was just a way to write back at SPECIAL K that supported me, it was kind of her/him.

 

But thank for having my back, appreciated. 

[1ManRaid]

6 hours ago, Special K said:

 

In all fairness, if you read his screen name, you may be able to figure out that he is from Italy....I’m sure English is his second language, so maybe that is why he doesn’t reply in other threads. 

 

He’s an international Bills fan...cut him some slack....it would be like you posting on an AC Milan forum in Italian while reading everyone else’s replies in Italian.

 

And yet he has the confidence in his English to post his own threads, and respond directly to people who post in his threads.  Second language isn't an excuse to ignore forum rules to post random nonsense threads and abandon those threads after creation.  Personally if I wasn't confident in my second language, I wouldn't be drawing attention to myself like that.

[ProcessTruster]

Benford is inactive, plus Groot.   Obviously Tre out as well.   So down 3 starters on D , at least.   

[taglientep]

13 hours ago, MPL said:

Questionable...

/internet 

[Xwnyer]

4 minutes ago, ProcessTruster said:

Benford is inactive, plus Groot.   Obviously Tre out as well.   So down 3 starters on D , at least.   

Not good 

[Italian Bills]

38 minutes ago, 1ManRaid said:

 

And yet he has the confidence in his English to post his own threads, and respond directly to people who post in his threads.  Second language isn't an excuse to ignore forum rules to post random nonsense threads and abandon those threads after creation.  Personally if I wasn't confident in my second language, I wouldn't be drawing attention to myself like that.

Get a life, is better than waste your time this way. 

[Xwnyer]

Shaq Lawson also out.

[Italian Bills]

12 minutes ago, Xwnyer said:

Shaq Lawson also out.

Damn… we are very devastated by injuries every year 

[Royale with Cheese]

9 hours ago, Beck Water said:

 

He came back in the game. 

I know.  He isn’t playing either.