Justice Posted April 8 Posted April 8 25 minutes ago, meazza said: Yes. Wearing a hijab or even the burka is not mandatory in the West Bank for example. Gaza on the other hand. Gaza? I never been there but I highly doubt you’re correct in saying that. Link? Proof? 1
The Frankish Reich Posted April 8 Posted April 8 19 minutes ago, Justice said: Can we agree to not slander religion? There’s subjects in all faiths that are harsh according to today’s standards Not "slander" religion. But I will point out that when zealots (and yes, there are plenty of ultra-Orthodox Jewish zealots in Israel, and due to the weakness of Netanyahu he must pander to them) take these ancient words about things we consider abusive and horrific today literally - and even try to turn them into official policy - they are practicing a kind of religious primitivism that has no place in the modern world. 1 1 1
meazza Posted April 8 Posted April 8 18 minutes ago, Justice said: Gaza? I never been there but I highly doubt you’re correct in saying that. Link? Proof? I have never seen a woman in Gaza in videos who wasn’t wearing a burka while I have seen plenty in the West Bank so it’s either mandatory or it’s strongly recommended.
Irv Posted April 8 Posted April 8 47 minutes ago, Justice said: Do you guys have to like me? Absolutely not. I don’t even blame you if you hate me. I’m rude, crude and judgmental. I’m not running for office. Idgaf. Call me what you want, but you can not call me a liar. I answer everyone. I do not ignore you. I might be wrong sometimes but that’s ok. It isn’t on purpose. So have at it. Come at me all you want. I can take it. In a pc world I come here to NOT be pc at all. That’s why I keep coming back. No. You're just boring. Go stare at the sun. 1
Justice Posted April 8 Posted April 8 36 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: Not "slander" religion. But I will point out that when zealots (and yes, there are plenty of ultra-Orthodox Jewish zealots in Israel, and due to the weakness of Netanyahu he must pander to them) take these ancient words about things we consider abusive and horrific today literally - and even try to turn them into official policy - they are practicing a kind of religious primitivism that has no place in the modern world. 100. No religion should ever dictate policy. 24 minutes ago, meazza said: I have never seen a woman in Gaza in videos who wasn’t wearing a burka while I have seen plenty in the West Bank so it’s either mandatory or it’s strongly recommended. I’d say the vast majority wear a hijab. Some wear a burka. So the Christian women (I know there aren’t many but there are some) in Gaza get an exemption or something? 1
Tommy Callahan Posted April 8 Posted April 8 2 hours ago, Justice said: And the “savage” native Americans, and people of color, and Asians and orientals. What’s funny is now even white people are getting it badly and they, understandably, do not like it. It’s wrong no matter who it is. It's a strange issue. Things like the "Vikings" are a very popular topic in Hollywood. Championing the heroes of that very "White" story. But no such movies/shows about Native Warriors/Battles that could be championed in the same way. Why?
yall Posted April 8 Posted April 8 3 hours ago, Justice said: More receipts “But if the thing is true, that evidence of virginity was not found in the young woman, then they shall bring out the young woman to the door of her father's house, and the men of her city shall stone her to death with stones, because she has done an outrageous thing in Israel by ***** in her father's house. So you shall purge the evil from your midst. “If a man is found lying with the wife of another man, both of them shall die, the man who lay with the woman, and the woman. So you shall purge the evil from Israel.” -Deuteronomy 22:20-22 Can we agree to not slander religion? There’s subjects in all faiths that are harsh according to today’s standards. And the “savage” native Americans, and people of color, and Asians and orientals. What’s funny is now even white people are getting it badly and they, understandably, do not like it. It’s wrong no matter who it is. The very crap you quote from these stupid books is the reason why we should all slander religion.
meazza Posted April 9 Posted April 9 27 minutes ago, B-Man said: Netanyahu declares ‘there is a date’ for Rafah invasion as Hamas claims ‘no ability’ to free 40 hostages. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu affirmed Monday that he plans to forge ahead with a long-anticipated and controversial military operation in the Gaza Strip city of Rafah — as Hamas reportedly claimed there are fewer than 40 women, elderly and ailing hostages for whom it can account. https://nypost.com/2024/04/08/us-news/netanyahu-declares-there-is-a-date-for-rafah-invasion-as-hamas-claims-no-ability-to-free-40-hostages/ . Listening to a podcast. There are 1000 combat soldiers in Gaza. Bibi has no strategy. 1
Justice Posted April 10 Posted April 10 16 hours ago, Tommy Callahan said: How you gonna declare a genocide when you’re the one funding it and supplying them the weapons. Lol you’re too funny for sharing this
Tommy Callahan Posted April 10 Posted April 10 (edited) 2 hours ago, Justice said: How you gonna declare a genocide when you’re the one funding it and supplying them the weapons. Lol you’re too funny for sharing this A genoside is an actual thing with definitions. And the last I knew the MSM and You are quoting HAMAS data to support the "Genoside" narrative. Its a ***** show that needs to end, but its not the genocide the current thing mobs are screaming. Genocide: the deliberate killing or severe mistreatment of a large number of people from a particular national or ethnic group with the aim of destroying that nation or group: HAMAS is the group being eradicated. They hide behind the Palestinians. using them as Martyr. Edited April 10 by Tommy Callahan
Tommy Callahan Posted April 10 Posted April 10 Ugh. Israel stated any Iranian attack on Israel land would be met with an Israeli attack on Iranian land.
sherpa Posted April 10 Posted April 10 20 minutes ago, Tommy Callahan said: Ugh. Israel stated any Iranian attack on Israel land would be met with an Israeli attack on Iranian land. That is tactically difficult, but something they have planned for for years, as they have viewed any Iranian nuclear capability as unacceptable. 1
Tiberius Posted April 10 Author Posted April 10 Trump shouldn't have pulled out of the nuclear deal. Now Iran is on the way to a bomb much sooner 1
sherpa Posted April 10 Posted April 10 1 minute ago, Tiberius said: Trump shouldn't have pulled out of the nuclear deal. Now Iran is on the way to a bomb much sooner More idiocy. Devoid of any understanding of the issue. No surprise 4 2
Tiberius Posted April 10 Author Posted April 10 2 hours ago, sherpa said: More idiocy. Devoid of any understanding of the issue. No surprise More denial, more silliness. More pretend wisdom from a person who completely lacks it 1
Justice Posted April 11 Posted April 11 14 hours ago, Tommy Callahan said: A genoside is an actual thing with definitions. And the last I knew the MSM and You are quoting HAMAS data to support the "Genoside" narrative. Its a ***** show that needs to end, but its not the genocide the current thing mobs are screaming. Genocide: the deliberate killing or severe mistreatment of a large number of people from a particular national or ethnic group with the aim of destroying that nation or group: HAMAS is the group being eradicated. They hide behind the Palestinians. using them as Martyr. “With the aim of destroying that nation…”. Have you seen Gaza? Their entire infrastructure is destroyed. They’ve wiped out all the hospitals, all the universities, think I heard something like 70% of the homes, over 1.5m people are displaced. If that’s not destroying a nation I don’t know what is 9 hours ago, Tiberius said: Trump shouldn't have pulled out of the nuclear deal. Now Iran is on the way to a bomb much sooner I’d prefer nobody had nukes, but since some do I wish everyone had nukes. If they did we wouldn’t see the ***** we’re seeing now.
Tiberius Posted April 11 Author Posted April 11 7 hours ago, Justice said: “With the aim of destroying that nation…”. Have you seen Gaza? Their entire infrastructure is destroyed. They’ve wiped out all the hospitals, all the universities, think I heard something like 70% of the homes, over 1.5m people are displaced. If that’s not destroying a nation I don’t know what is I’d prefer nobody had nukes, but since some do I wish everyone had nukes. If they did we wouldn’t see the ***** we’re seeing now. I dunno, no WW3 since nukes have been around, and I prefer democratic nations only have the bomb. 1
Recommended Posts