NewEra Posted October 7, 2023 Posted October 7, 2023 1 hour ago, TheyCallMeAndy said: Eh. He’s been targeted 13 times and has allowed 9 catches (69%) for 148 yards (16.4 YPC) and 33 YAC. QB rating against him is 107. Plus side, he’s been credited with zero missed tackles. I still think his future is at safety. How was his coverage on the other 150+ snaps? 1 Quote
Mr. WEO Posted October 7, 2023 Posted October 7, 2023 3 wins and it's time to assign "shutdown corner"?? Quote
Don Otreply Posted October 7, 2023 Posted October 7, 2023 4 hours ago, Billzgobowlin said: Is this a legitimate stat for a zone defense? Even in “zone coverage “ it is always man as the play develops. Quote
Doc Posted October 7, 2023 Posted October 7, 2023 30 minutes ago, Sierra Foothills said: For what it's worth he played 9 games with 5 starts last season before being placed on IR. With Jackson starting opposite him. 1 Quote
Ralonzo Posted October 7, 2023 Posted October 7, 2023 (edited) 7 hours ago, Buffalo_Stampede said: Interesting chart. Christian Benford leads the Bills in preventing separation. That's a weird chart. I'd think someone like Leodis McKelvin would have been toppest rightest. Nobody gets separation, but they throw at him anyway because he can't find the ball. J.C.Jackson bottomest leftest. Everyone's open but nobody throws at him? Wut? Levi Wallace also in that neighborhood. Edited October 7, 2023 by Ralonzo Quote
Rubes Posted October 7, 2023 Posted October 7, 2023 6 minutes ago, Ralonzo said: That's a weird chart. I'd think someone like Leodis McKelvin would have been toppest rightest. Nobody gets separation, but they throw at him anyway because he can't find the ball. J.C.Jackson bottomest leftest. Everyone's open but nobody throws at him? Wut? Levi Wallace also in that neighborhood. I don't know, but the higher number on the Y-axis (target %) is at the bottom, which would suggest the lower on that axis you are, the more you're targeted. So JC Jackson is targeted a lot and allows more separation...? 1 Quote
Ed_Formerly_of_Roch Posted October 7, 2023 Posted October 7, 2023 2 hours ago, Buffalo_Stampede said: We never give Taron Johnson enough love. He’s easily our CB1. Been CB1 for a couple years. Last week in the Wednesday prior to the game coach press conference McDaniel's singled out Taron Johnson as being one of the best nickel CB in the league. 1 Quote
Ralonzo Posted October 7, 2023 Posted October 7, 2023 24 minutes ago, Rubes said: I don't know, but the higher number on the Y-axis (target %) is at the bottom, which would suggest the lower on that axis you are, the more you're targeted. So JC Jackson is targeted a lot and allows more separation...? That makes more sense. Most charts are constructed so that top-right is best (positive-positive) and bottom-left is worst. Quote
machine gun kelly Posted October 7, 2023 Posted October 7, 2023 3 hours ago, Buffalo_Stampede said: We never give Taron Johnson enough love. He’s easily our CB1. Been CB1 for a couple years. That is true. Don’t be surprised if you don’t see more of Rapp each week whether it’s for heavy sets against running or TE teams, or exchanging for our regulars in Poyer and Hyde. We need those 2 for all 22 weeks as this team is going to go deep this year. Quote
Saxum Posted October 7, 2023 Posted October 7, 2023 7 hours ago, Pete said: Benford beat out Elam with technique and tenacity. Elam is fine, and will do great today. Benford is the better CB I think Elam ceiling is better but Benford's floor is much higher than Elam's current level. Elam needs to get beyond his physical talent. 32 minutes ago, Ed_Formerly_of_Roch said: Last week in the Wednesday prior to the game coach press conference McDaniel's singled out Taron Johnson as being one of the best nickel CB in the league. So have a few broadcasters. He gets respect in the league. 1 Quote
MasterStrategist Posted October 7, 2023 Posted October 7, 2023 1 hour ago, C.Biscuit97 said: Dude is playing really well and is a gem of a get it. But he’s in for a big jump without White. losing your number 1 cb is such a huge loss because everyone has to move up. Is it really though? Guess we will find out. Not like we move Tre around on the teams #1 all game. We mix up so much zone/safety help. I don't think we will see a ton of drop off with Dane, or Elam. As long as our DL and LB play continues 1 Quote
BarleyNY Posted October 7, 2023 Posted October 7, 2023 5 hours ago, Billzgobowlin said: Is this a legitimate stat for a zone defense? Yes. Most zone defenses - including the Bills - incorporate pattern matching. Zone schemes that are strictly players covering grass are not very effective against today’s NFL. Quote
ChrisWatson#21 Posted October 7, 2023 Posted October 7, 2023 6 hours ago, strive_for_five_guy said: You really think Elam is ready for today’s walk-through? 😇 Joking aside, I’ve been questioning for a few weeks now whether Benford was our best corner. When the ball is thrown his way, seems like he’s normally on his guy like glue, minus the Sauce Gardner holding. Did the playbook he asked for when drafted arrive yet? If so he should be ready then. Quote
TheyCallMeAndy Posted October 7, 2023 Posted October 7, 2023 1 hour ago, NewEra said: How was his coverage on the other 150+ snaps? That doesn’t prove or disprove anything. The information and data suggests the “lock down” talk is pre-mature. Not saying he sucks, he still has a lot to prove. 69% completion and a 10+ YPC is bad any way it’s spun. Truth is, the most picked on player on defense is Tre White (17 targets, 9 completions). Bernard, Johnson, and Benford are all tied for second, each player has given up 9 catches. Thankfully our DL and LB play has been elite. Quote
Bubba Gump Posted October 7, 2023 Posted October 7, 2023 Oof, all these analytical charts make my head hurt. Quote
NewEra Posted October 7, 2023 Posted October 7, 2023 45 minutes ago, TheyCallMeAndy said: That doesn’t prove or disprove anything. The information and data suggests the “lock down” talk is pre-mature. Not saying he sucks, he still has a lot to prove. 69% completion and a 10+ YPC is bad any way it’s spun. Truth is, the most picked on player on defense is Tre White (17 targets, 9 completions). Bernard, Johnson, and Benford are all tied for second, each player has given up 9 catches. Thankfully our DL and LB play has been elite. It does if he locked down his man 99% of the other snaps. I don’t believe that the only stats that matter are the stats that you linked. There’s more to it. Listen, I’m not saying he’s a lockdown….I’m just disagreeing with your method for determining a lockdown over a 4 game span. A corner can prove his worth on plays where they aren’t targeted. 1 Quote
TheyCallMeAndy Posted October 7, 2023 Posted October 7, 2023 5 minutes ago, NewEra said: It does if he locked down his man 99% of the other snaps. I don’t believe that the only stats that matter are the stats that you linked. There’s more to it. Listen, I’m not saying he’s a lockdown….I’m just disagreeing with your method for determining a lockdown over a 4 game span. A corner can prove his worth on plays where they aren’t targeted. You and I are on the same page with Benford, I have no doubts about that. If we went down the rabbit hole of CBs being good at preventing separation but yet struggling at preventing the reception, we’d hijack this thread lol 1 Quote
billsfan89 Posted October 7, 2023 Posted October 7, 2023 I wouldn't say "shutdown corner" just yet, but Benford has looked good. Benford isn't the best athlete but he is good enough and plays very smart. Benford and Dane have really shown that the corner position in this defense is about playing smart and playing within your assignment. I hope Elam really gets going, I am OK with growing pains in October and November for Elam as he has to learn the system by playing in it. Hopefully by mid-December Elam rounds into form and the Bills have both the technical sound boundary players (Benford and Jackson) and an athletic corner (Elam) out there crushing it. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.