Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
46 minutes ago, BuffaloBillyG said:

That's next to nothing and he may care a bit more playing for a top offense.

 

That said this was a dumb move for Miami. Taking the risk of absorbing another huge ego on the team. With Berrios playing well in the slot already and there still only being 1 ball to get spread around...just not worth the risk IMO.

 

But Miami just loves collecting "big names" for no benefit.

I don’t understand how they are going to afford him,Hill, and Waddle and extend Tua.  Also why? Barrios was doing fine as a third option. Also how does this fox the D that was torched by the Bills and probably any good O that faces them? Weird 

  • Agree 1
Posted
50 minutes ago, streetkings01 said:

Should’ve traded for lineman.

 

Look out for a response from Liam Eichenburg’s Twitter burner account!!

  • Haha (+1) 3
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, PatsFanNH said:

I don’t understand how they are going to afford him,Hill, and Waddle and extend Tua.  Also why? Barrios was doing fine as a third option. Also how does this fox the D that was torched by the Bills and probably any good O that faces them? Weird 

 

It makes me wonder how much their elderly owner is calling shots

Posted
49 minutes ago, Beast said:

I can’t say I blame them. Character doesn’t matter to a team like the Chiefs who have two championships in recent years. Why not test your luck?

 

In the end Maholms and Reid are the reason the Chiefs win and if the Dolphins do it will be Tua and McDaniels. Not every move has worked when the Chiefs take these type of moves either. I genuinely am curious if the Chiefs would have made the trade for Toney for a 3rd today?  I know many on here were up in arms that the Bills didn't make that move last October and Beane looks correct today.  

We'll see if a 3rd change in coaching helps Claypool he has had a few flashes on the field and some troubling actions on and off it. I don't see WR as a need for Buffalo now especially not since they have to pay 2mil of Claypools salary and not a culture fit.  

Posted
25 minutes ago, Captain Hindsight said:

He played with likely future HOFer Roethlisberger his rookie year on a team that started 13-0

My bad....  All the more reason as we see what he did with a competent QB in his final season (#1 & 2 receivers were Juju and Diante Johnson).😉   

Posted
4 minutes ago, Pine Barrens Mafia said:

People here are seriously complaining?

 

The Bears. THE BEARS let him go. That in and of itself should tell you the actual value of the player.

 

The Bears let Roquan Smith go too so they could sign Tremaine Edmunds.

 

Maybe “the Bears thought this was smart” shouldn’t be our criteria?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Pine Barrens Mafia said:

People here are seriously complaining?

 

The Bears. THE BEARS let him go. That in and of itself should tell you the actual value of the player.

 

People get frustrated (not me, but others on here) because the Fins are always taking swings. The trade for Hill worked out. The trade for Chubb last year at the deadline has not. But they are in a win-now mode and a lot of people would like to trade draft capital to take a swing for this year.

Posted
14 minutes ago, PatsFanNH said:

I don’t understand how they are going to afford him,Hill, and Waddle and extend Tua.  Also why? Barrios was doing fine as a third option. Also how does this fox the D that was torched by the Bills and probably any good O that faces them? Weird 

 

Its a depth piece. Expiring deal and see if he fits, basically 0 trade comp.  If he doesn't fit or play well its easy to either dump him this year, or let him walk in FA.   

Posted
1 minute ago, FireChans said:

The Bears let Roquan Smith go too so they could sign Tremaine Edmunds.

 

Maybe “the Bears thought this was smart” shouldn’t be our criteria?

 

Sure, they aren't the model franchise to follow...BUT, since he's been gone, Fields and the offense have put up 30+ points in back-to-back games...

 

Whose to say they were better WITH Claypool?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

Best thing on this from Finheaven, “we have a very strong character pulse on this team and especially with Welker and Hill. He won’t be crying for long in a dolphin uni if that’s his deal”

 

Hill? Strong character?!

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, FrenchConnection said:

People get frustrated (not me, but others on here) because the Fins are always taking swings. The trade for Hill worked out. The trade for Chubb last year at the deadline has not. But they are in a win-now mode and a lot of people would like to trade draft capital to take a swing for this year.

 

A lot of people are truly clueless.

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, mrags said:

First part of me lols and says he will tear them apart even more from the inside. 
 

second part of me is angered that we didn’t make that trade for him. It’s almost nothing. Should have taken a stab at it. 

I'm with the second part of you. Would have cost next to nothing to PS him. The guy needs to get his head straight but he had a good rookie year with a declining Ben and since then has not played in a good offence or with a good QB. Maybe Josh (and Diggs) could have helped turn him around. Dolphins have looming cap issues and we may not be in a position to resign Gabe.

  • Disagree 2
Posted
17 minutes ago, PatsFanNH said:

I don’t understand how they are going to afford him,Hill, and Waddle and extend Tua.  Also why? Barrios was doing fine as a third option. Also how does this fox the D that was torched by the Bills and probably any good O that faces them? Weird 

Yes, their real weak spot is LBer. This solves nothing for them. Just a move to make a move really. But we have seen this from Miami for years and years. Saw some speculation that because of his size they may view him as a Deebo type. And that would be magnificent...take the ball out of Tua and Achane's hands as much as possible. I like that...for us.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

Not a bad move. He is a bigger threat that MIA does not have. He comes basically free and there is no future money on the hook. If he is a problem you just cut him. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted

I'm guessing because they want a WR with size considering most of their WR's are smaller. My question is how much and if he plays a significant role who is he taking reps from. 

 

They have Hill, Waddle, Achane is playing kind of a hybrid RB/WR right now and lines up in the slot a lot, and Berrios. I suppose Waddle and Claypool outside with Hill,Achane, Berrios playing the slot spots with Mostert and Wilson getting RB reps. Just sounds like their going to have a hard time getting everyone the amount of reps they want. Plus Claypool is a bust but going to an explosive offense might reinvigorate him a bit. 

  • Like (+1) 1
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...