Ed_Formerly_of_Roch Posted October 2, 2023 Posted October 2, 2023 45 minutes ago, RiotAct said: interesting thought - could very well be! He should be a go for the Jacksonville game, right? May depend on what the team thought of Rapps play? Quote
Simon Posted December 13, 2023 Author Posted December 13, 2023 On 10/2/2023 at 10:50 AM, Simon said: Dear Jordan Poyer doubters, Bite me. Yours truly, Simon I'm going to go ahead and take some lumps on this one cuz it's looking like I may have been dead wrong. I really thought Poyer was just laying in the weeds, keeping himself healthy for the stretch run. And I really thought that coming out of the bye and going to Kansas City would be the week he decided to go ahead and let the dawg out. I like the guy and appreciate what he's done so I will be diplomatic and just say that letting that dawg out was NOT what happened on Sunday. 4 2 1 Quote
Rubes Posted December 13, 2023 Posted December 13, 2023 Yeah. Unfortunately, Poyer is losing a step. I think he’ll stick around another year while we train up his replacement. On the other side, Hyde is at the point where he just needs to retire. We can’t rely on him being healthy for long stretches anymore. Sucks because they were an awesome duo to have for all these years. Hope we can find worthy replacements. 1 Quote
TheFunPolice Posted December 13, 2023 Posted December 13, 2023 What's not to love about Jordan Poyer? The man is a warrior, and has been a top safety while playing through injury. He's everything you want in a player. Sadly, time and the effects of a career worth of injuries are really starting to take their toll. Time comes for every player eventually, especially at positions requiring speed and agility. 1 Quote
DrMaxPower Posted December 13, 2023 Posted December 13, 2023 (edited) Agreed, though I'll give him partial credit for getting his nose dirty in the box. He's at least been active down low and made a few tackles and a couple punch outs. The guy that's been really killing me is Hyde. Feels like he hasn't made a play all year. He's always a step slow or a few inches short on the jump. With all due respect to a good dude who has given a lot of years of high quality service, he might be our worst starter right now. I'd rather see Lewis play. At least his legs aren't shot. Really too bad that these guys have hit the wall at the same time. Edited December 13, 2023 by DrMaxPower 2 1 Quote
DrDawkinstein Posted December 13, 2023 Posted December 13, 2023 On 10/2/2023 at 12:59 PM, DrDawkinstein said: Love Poyer and what he's done for this team, but if he has to wait until December to really turn on his A-game there will be a chance that Rapp unseats him for the starting spot by then. Younger, healthier legs sure seem to make a difference back there. While I still stand by the general thoughts in my post, I'll say that I currently do not want Rapp anywhere near our Defense. Dude is a loose cannon and is more dangerous to our own Defense than he is to the opposition. I like his age and agility, and he doesnt seem to make any crazy obvious mistakes. But his hitting technique should not be tolerated. 1 2 Quote
Aussie Joe Posted December 13, 2023 Posted December 13, 2023 I didn’t want Poyer brought back after last year … but given question marks over the other three safeties … I can now see him returning in 2024 … they might have to squeeze his dollars though given his diminishing play.. Certainly a position where some work needs to be done in the offseason ( another one)… Quote
JohnNord Posted December 13, 2023 Posted December 13, 2023 On 10/2/2023 at 12:57 PM, Simon said: Only two people thought this was funny? Damn, I must be slippin'. Anyhoo, here is what I think is going on. Last year I think Mr Poyer learned a very hard (and very expensive) lesson about how to manage his health throughout a long season. At the very beginning of last year he was absolutely trying to murder any viable target that came within 10yrds of him, repeatedly throwing his body at full speed and exposed, awkward angles at large armored athletes on practically every series. Needless to say, this is not a strategy that is conducive to playing 16 football games in a row. And sure enough by later in the year, he was a shell of himself being held together by duct tape and bailing wire. I think what we're seeing right now is a smarter, more veteran Poyer trying to play a much more controlled game, preserve his health and assure that when things get really important later in the year that he will be ready to go at full speed. Is it a good idea? I think it is, both for Poyer and for the Bills. It may lead to fewer kill shots and fewer turnovers in the short term, but if it leads to a healthy Poyer in the playoffs, it will have been well worth it. I fully expect to see a transition at some point in December where that heedless assassin begins to re-emerge in games against playoff worthy rivals; and I hope he does it wisely enough that when elimination games start he can step on the field and once again start trying to murder everybody in a different colored shirt. I hope you are correct. I’ve noticed that Poyer has 0 INTs this year, whereas last year he had 5 in 12 games and 4 in the season before. Not sure what to attribute this to, but I’m hoping that number picks up soon Quote
Einstein Posted December 13, 2023 Posted December 13, 2023 20 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said: While I still stand by the general thoughts in my post, I'll say that I currently do not want Rapp anywhere near our Defense. Plus he just sucks. I remember reading the Rams forum after Rapp signed with us and they were mostly celebrating. It’s a rarely a good sign when a players former team has fans celebrating him leaving. Quote
HomeskillitMoorman Posted December 13, 2023 Posted December 13, 2023 Haha if someone's being "trained" to be the replacement, it definitely shouldn't be Rapp. 2 Quote
Simon Posted December 13, 2023 Author Posted December 13, 2023 2 hours ago, HomeskillitMoorman said: Haha if someone's being "trained" to be the replacement, it definitely shouldn't be Rapp. I don't know, I could see Rapp being trained. Possibly by a long line of dudes that he's tried to kill. 2 1 Quote
BuffaloBillyG Posted December 13, 2023 Posted December 13, 2023 I, too will stand by my overall comments from previous. I believe Poyer played through way too many injuries last year and that took a perm toll on the body. He's still been for the most part, decent. But a far fall from where he was 2-3 years ago. Guy has been a warrior, though. 1 Quote
Solomon Grundy Posted December 13, 2023 Posted December 13, 2023 On 10/2/2023 at 1:15 PM, Buffalo_Stampede said: Dear Jordan Poyer, Prove the doubters wrong. I'm more worried about Hyde. The neck injury seems to give him second thoughts when tackling. The attempt on Hurts for the game winning TD was questionable at best Quote
finn Posted December 13, 2023 Posted December 13, 2023 1 hour ago, HomeskillitMoorman said: Haha if someone's being "trained" to be the replacement, it definitely shouldn't be Rapp. Is Hamlin really that bad to stay on the bench even though Poyer and Hyde are barely hanging on? Yes, he was a liability when he played, pre-injury. But surely he's developed since then, right? Of course, we've been wondering the same thing about Elam. Could be McDermott's judgment is wrong. Or it could be both players just aren't very good. Quote
AuntieEm Posted December 13, 2023 Posted December 13, 2023 On 10/2/2023 at 12:57 PM, Simon said: Only two people thought this was funny? Damn, I must be slippin'. It was funny but it was just copycat of Whoopi Goldberg's response to the media that suggested Dolly should act her age after appearing in cowboy cheerleader outfit and the little picture I saw she doesn't look her age. So I guess Poyer is your football Dolly Parton? Rest of your post I agree he is playing smarter. Quote
Rew Posted December 14, 2023 Posted December 14, 2023 Poyer and Hyde aren't at the levels they were at in their primes, but the defense is still notably worse when either are out. They may not be "arguably best safety pairing in the league", but they aren't a liability when on the field. Still both quality starters that have tremendous responsibility in an otherwise depleted secondary. I'd be comfortable with their skill levels going into next year, but unfortunately availability is becoming an issue. 1 Quote
LABILLBACKER Posted December 14, 2023 Posted December 14, 2023 1 hour ago, finn said: Is Hamlin really that bad to stay on the bench even though Poyer and Hyde are barely hanging on? Yes, he was a liability when he played, pre-injury. But surely he's developed since then, right? Of course, we've been wondering the same thing about Elam. Could be McDermott's judgment is wrong. Or it could be both players just aren't very good. Simon's early prediction was intriguing but as the weeks have gone by we've all clearly seen the rapid deterioration of both Poyer and Hyde. The biggest indicator is the drop off in speed. I honestly think they're both gone after this season and NO Rapp/ Hamlin are not viable replacements. Besides drafting WR's, we'll need safeties badly. Quote
finn Posted December 14, 2023 Posted December 14, 2023 1 minute ago, LABILLBACKER said: Simon's early prediction was intriguing but as the weeks have gone by we've all clearly seen the rapid deterioration of both Poyer and Hyde. The biggest indicator is the drop off in speed. I honestly think they're both gone after this season and NO Rapp/ Hamlin are not viable replacements. Besides drafting WR's, we'll need safeties badly. Any thoughts on Benford moving to safety if Elam works out? He has the requisite size, speed, and zone skills. Not a new idea, I know; I'm just trying to remember if there was a logical objection. Moving him to safety would allow Beane to use his first draft pick on a WR and move on from Davis, upgrading two positions and saving a lot of money to boot. Might still need a second safety, though. Quote
DrDawkinstein Posted December 14, 2023 Posted December 14, 2023 3 minutes ago, finn said: Any thoughts on Benford moving to safety if Elam works out? He has the requisite size, speed, and zone skills. Not a new idea, I know; I'm just trying to remember if there was a logical objection. Moving him to safety would allow Beane to use his first draft pick on a WR and move on from Davis, upgrading two positions and saving a lot of money to boot. Might still need a second safety, though. I'd think Douglas is most likely to eventually transition into Hyde's spot. But I dont think any of the CBs do. We'd need them to move next year, and we'd just be creating another hole. We need 2 starting Safeties and 1 CB for next year. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.