Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
11 minutes ago, RunTheBall said:

That’s why it was in quotes. Of course they were getting rid of him but McBeane are 2 classy guys so they did it in a way that Frazier saved face and could keep the hope of getting another job in the future alive. Personally I don’t think Frazier will coach again and I really appreciate the way McBeane handled it because as much as I wanted Frazier gone I respect the man.

I am the one that put it in quotes here. Are you forgetting what you typed? Because you make it sound like you originally thought that they allowed Frazier to stay as long as he wished and he is the one that left on his own. 
 

if that’s the case you made my point.
 

it’s a black eye on McBeane for not getting rid of him much sooner. Especially after the 13 second debacle. regardless if they terminated Frazier or let him walk on his own. It should have been a long time ago. And with the defense playing as well as they are right now, signs point to a blunder for allowing Frazier to stay as long as he did. Either way, it’s a knock on McB

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 hour ago, mrags said:

if you actually think they let Frazier “depart on his own terms” then I guess we have nothing to talk about here. I don’t believe that crap for one minute. 

I think Frazier was good. But had serious flaws. Like his lack of aggressiveness like always. He would consistently go into a prevent shell any chance he could. It cost us games. It’s something he’s always done. Dating back to the days he was a HC as well. Would get way to conservative. 

I agree. And he was relieved of his duties.  It’s not like we didn’t have very good defenses with him.  They just weren’t good enough, partly because of him.
 

 I don’t agree with people that are banging on McD for not firing Frazier sooner.  

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
5 hours ago, Fallser said:

I’d pump the brakes on pro bowl talk but a couple of these guys look better this year. 

 

Buffalo, the traditional home of the #1 defense with #0 guys selected to the Pro Bowl.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, NewEra said:

I agree. And he was relieved of his duties.  It’s not like we didn’t have very good defenses with him.  They just weren’t good enough, partly because of him.
 

 I don’t agree with people that are banging on McD for not firing Frazier sooner.  

I just think a lot of it falls on McD. If he’s doing what he’s doing with this defense there’s no reason he should allowed Frazier to do what he did for years without addressing it. It essentially cost is the 13 second game. There’s more as well. It’s on McD for not addressing it. 
 

but yes, our defense was very good even with that being a major problem. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 hours ago, NoSaint said:

It’ll be interesting to see McD settle on long term as he puts tendencies back on tape.

 

This might turn out to be a very dumb statement but I'm not sure the defense has tendencies. McDermott is mixing it up constantly. We blitzed quite a few times in the first half today, then mostly dropped everyone into coverage in the 2nd half. We mostly rush 4 but it's anybody's guess which 4 are coming. When you combine that balanced play calling with a talented front 4 and a fundamentally sound back 7, and everyone is playing off of what their teammates are doing to near perfection, that's how you hold a 70 point offense to 20 points. I don't think there's some code for a genius offensive mind to crack here.

Posted
3 hours ago, RunTheBall said:

No question Frazier was a big problem in that game, and I said I’m glad he “took a year off”. My point, that you clearly missed, was that there was no way McBeane was going to get rid of Frazier after 13 seconds given the high regard they had for him and the fact that statistically the defense was very very good. We all saw the weaknesses, and I bet that if McD was calling the D there probably would have been a different outcome. But, given the culture and loyalty McBeane have that just wasn’t going to happen. Plus, I think Edmunds in the middle was a bigger problem than I realized given that both Mahomes and Burrow abused him regularly.

 

1 hour ago, mrags said:

I am the one that put it in quotes here. Are you forgetting what you typed? Because you make it sound like you originally thought that they allowed Frazier to stay as long as he wished and he is the one that left on his own. 
 

if that’s the case you made my point.
 

it’s a black eye on McBeane for not getting rid of him much sooner. Especially after the 13 second debacle. regardless if they terminated Frazier or let him walk on his own. It should have been a long time ago. And with the defense playing as well as they are right now, signs point to a blunder for allowing Frazier to stay as long as he did. Either way, it’s a knock on McB

 

Mrags my bad. As you can see, I replied to 2 posts and I included the first one where I put “took a year off” in quotes. The post you replied to was the next one I wrote right after where I did not include the quotes so I can see why you’d think I was changing my tune. For the record, Frazier got fired but they let him save some face. I don’t think Frazier left on his own, I think McBeane let it be known they were going in another direction and  allowed him to exit with some dignity. Sorry for the confusion.

 

As for getting rid of Frazier sooner, I don’t think it was possible even though in retrospect it would have probably been the right move. You had a highly respected  coach with a statistically top 3 defense. The Bills would have been absolutely destroyed from a PR perspective and as I said, McBeane are loyal to a fault sometimes with players and coaches. I agree with you that in retrospect it would have been the right move but I can see why the move wasn’t made sooner.

Posted

The two biggest noticeable things are.... 

 

1.  Play calling/Game planning.  Guys are constantly put in position to make impact plays. 

 

2. Execution.  Guys are accountable for their 1/11th and are where they are supposed be. 

 

Frazier wasn't terrible, he's just not as good as McD. 

 

 

Posted
4 hours ago, RunTheBall said:

 

 

Mrags my bad. As you can see, I replied to 2 posts and I included the first one where I put “took a year off” in quotes. The post you replied to was the next one I wrote right after where I did not include the quotes so I can see why you’d think I was changing my tune. For the record, Frazier got fired but they let him save some face. I don’t think Frazier left on his own, I think McBeane let it be known they were going in another direction and  allowed him to exit with some dignity. Sorry for the confusion.

 

As for getting rid of Frazier sooner, I don’t think it was possible even though in retrospect it would have probably been the right move. You had a highly respected  coach with a statistically top 3 defense. The Bills would have been absolutely destroyed from a PR perspective and as I said, McBeane are loyal to a fault sometimes with players and coaches. I agree with you that in retrospect it would have been the right move but I can see why the move wasn’t made sooner.

I agree with most of this. I think many wanted someone’s head to roll after 13 seconds and they had their chance. But you are correct. They are definitely loyal to a fault.
 

Let’s hope the move that was ultimately made pats off. So far I was wrong about McD and how the defense would perform. As I thought it wouldn’t be any different. I’ll keep eating crow and enjoy it if they keep putting up performances like they have. 

Posted

Yup. It's truly night and day. This play calling and aggressive/ferocious defense is levels above Frazier

 

I said from day 1, I think the d takes on their DCs personality to a certain extent.  Frazier was laid back n calm. Sean is fiery and it looks like they've added that. Our pass rush is phenomenal 

Posted (edited)
12 hours ago, gonzo1105 said:

Feel free to merge this with the other Frazier thread but the more I watch this defense, and this team in general, has an edge to it. 
 

It’s pretty clear through 4 games that Frazier wasn’t running McDermotts defense and McDermott determined that his DC was holding some players back. 
 

The difference in play and aggressiveness from Ed Oliver, Greg Rousseau have been night and day. 
 

The development of AJ Epenesa who has been really good early this year, Terrell Bernard, Christian Benford look like pro bowl type players now. 
 

just a huge night and day difference with some of these guys from last year. 

Is there a Frazier coached player who's left and gone on to really blossom?  That would be a development issue.  I can promise you Edmunds hasn't.   He looks the same.

 

I agree with others that simply the shift in strategical approach has better empowered our guys.

Edited by GaryPinC
Posted
6 hours ago, HappyDays said:

 

This might turn out to be a very dumb statement but I'm not sure the defense has tendencies. McDermott is mixing it up constantly. We blitzed quite a few times in the first half today, then mostly dropped everyone into coverage in the 2nd half. We mostly rush 4 but it's anybody's guess which 4 are coming. When you combine that balanced play calling with a talented front 4 and a fundamentally sound back 7, and everyone is playing off of what their teammates are doing to near perfection, that's how you hold a 70 point offense to 20 points. I don't think there's some code for a genius offensive mind to crack here.


im not saying it’ll be stale and incredibly predictable but at some point it’ll emerge that against certain packages, or in certain situations he will lean on certain calls more often. I’m not saying suddenly the whole thing becomes predictable but you are watching games straight through not dialing up every 3rd and 8-12 that he’s called for 8 games to see if it’s 60-40 blitz or drop 

Posted
11 hours ago, MarlinTheMagician said:

I am glad McDermott is calling the D plays.  But Leslie Frazier was, is and will always be one helluva human being dedicated to his players and his craft.  Let's not do the after-the-fact blame game and be happy with what we have.  


This is not just a you thing, but what does Leslie Frazier being a good human being have to do with utilizing talent in a correct manner? 
 

I mean I’m a good guy doesn’t mean I do everything well in life 

Posted

The main criticism for Sean McDermott (especially over the last two seasons) is that he was good enough to turn the Bills into a contender... but not good enough to get this team across the finish line.

 

But over the first 4 games of the season, we may be seeing that Leslie Frazier was actually the primary reason for this.  And honestly it shouldn't be that surprising when you stop and think about it.

 

Frazier's strength has always been fundamentals.  Knowing your job.  Being in position.  Disguising coverages, but rarely blitzing.  Keeping plays underneath and then buckling down in the Red Zone.  And every season we saw the exact same results.  Totally shutting down the low-level QBs on our schedule and achieving a Top 5 defensive ranking in most categories, but then totally collapsing in the playoffs against elite passers.

 

McDermott seems to be living in both worlds.  He's got the veterans (Poyer, Hyde, Milano, White, etc.) who have been playing together for years.  They know the fundamentals.  They know where to be and what position to be in, especially on the back-end.  But the aggression has also been dialed up to a 10 with the pass rush.  And by stressing opposing blockers with blitzing, it's allowing us to finally maximize the deeply talented D-Line we've been building for years.

 

Posted

our coaching now is better than it was when we lost the 21 second game.  offense and defense, and i think HC too as mcD seems to have learned some lessons.

 

with floyd, von, and even tiny bernard (i can't believe im saying that) we also have playmakers on D we didn't have back then.

 

on O, the biggest issue w our team after the 2020 and 2021 season was 1) blocking, and 2) we just could not get production from the TE and RB positions.  

 

we've made huge strides there, altho we don't have the TE production i kinda expected, if fools are gonna let diggs get open, that doesn't really matter so much.

Posted
8 hours ago, mrags said:

I just think a lot of it falls on McD. If he’s doing what he’s doing with this defense there’s no reason he should allowed Frazier to do what he did for years without addressing it. It essentially cost is the 13 second game. There’s more as well. It’s on McD for not addressing it. 
 

but yes, our defense was very good even with that being a major problem. 


This is all speculation imo.  We don’t know what was said behind closed doors.  We don’t know what McD did or didn’t say to Frazier over the years.  Do we know that it was Frazier calling the plays in 13 seconds?

 

I don’t really care to discuss this anymore.  I’d rather live in the present than complain about the past.   Especially to complain about our HC/DC that just shut down the vaunted Miami O.   
 

He won that game yesterday, taking a perceived young mastermind to the woodshed

Posted (edited)
14 hours ago, EasternOHBillsFan said:

 

You're wrong.... dead wrong.

 

Everyone can see the night and day difference in the attacking nature of our defense this season.

And i agree.  McD is better thus far.

 

My point was is that one day Mc is awful.  The next game, depending on score, Frazier is awful.  The game after, it's Allen.  

 

Next week, if we have a let down, it'll be "Miss Frazier yet?". 

 

People act SO damn finicky with these week to week threads.  

Edited by Blackbeard
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
13 hours ago, HoofHearted said:

Incorrect, it's the same system. McDermott is just a more aggressive play caller than Frazier. Same system, same concepts, different signal caller is all the difference.

Silly statement...

The biggest difference could be that Sean has a better Dline than Leslie ever had. I don't think enough people recognize that. Adding Leonard Floyd to the mix of DaQuon Jones, a healthy Ed Oliver and Greg Rousseau entering his breakout 3rd season was huge. 

Posted

Who has the breakdown of Fangios Defense and how he is locked into certain plays based on the personnel he puts on the field.  I know there is a right up how he telegraphs what is going to happen with just the personnel package?

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...