Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

We all watch other teams play aside from the Bills. We’re able to see teams hit WRs in stride and make big plays. 
 

meanwhile our big plays are stationary catches. 20 yard strikes to a Knox on his knees or a zone sitting Diggs who rolls for another yard. 
 

Diggs was ranked 26th in YAC last year. Dont get me wrong, Josh is amazing at hitting stationary targets. But when it comes to guys on the run, he tends to put it into their chest. I still can’t figure out why this hasn’t been addressed. It’s been a thing since his first year. 

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Eyeroll 4
  • Agree 3
  • Dislike 2
Posted (edited)

A lot of deep crossers end up near the sideline so the receiver takes a few steps and is OOB.  

 

A lot of routes are stop and comebacks which are not going to get a lot of YAC.

 

He doesn't throw as many checkdowns to backs who gain 10-15 yards after the catch or screens where they are behind the LOS so they have lots of space to run.  

 

The offense is designed differently and relies more on Allen using his arm to gain those extra 5-6 yards versus the receivers running the extra 5 or 6 yards.  

 

Unsure why some people continuously keep harping on this as if there is something wrong.  Nothing is wrong, it's just an offense that isn't designed to rack up huge YAC numbers.  Allen hit Davis in stride 35 yards downfield in the corner of the endzone yesterday but got 0 YAC yards.  Would it have made you feel better if his arm was weaker and he hit him at the 12 yard line and he picked up 10 YAC yards to the 2 before being shoved out of bounds and then they had to settle for a FG?

 

Essentially...stop trying to manufacture problems that aren't actually problems.

Edited by Big Turk
  • Like (+1) 17
  • Eyeroll 1
  • Agree 3
  • Thank you (+1) 5
Posted

I think some of it is the receivers - Diggs is great, but he really isn’t a good open field runner.  He’s mostly looking to protect the ball and himself it seems, which is ok by me.  But I have noticed the same thing about YAC with this team. 

  • Like (+1) 5
  • Agree 5
Posted

The difference is they are getting the yards in the air most of the time.  Other teams will hit a 3-5 yard slant that ends up getting 10-15 yards.  The bills get all 10-15 yards in the air (most of the time).

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Agree 1
Posted

How often do you see Josh hit a wideout in stride?  How often do you see Josh hit a wideout from the pocket or on platform?

 

The team, and fans a like are chasing an invisible monster.  The Bills arent good in YAC because there often isnt any YAC to be had. 

 

As much as I love our Quarterback he isnt a rhythm thrower, and that is the Bills biggest problem when it comes to YAC.

Posted (edited)
On 9/25/2023 at 1:00 PM, quinnearlysghost88 said:

We all watch other teams play aside from the Bills. We’re able to see teams hit WRs in stride and make big plays. 
 

meanwhile our big plays are stationary catches. 20 yard strikes to a Knox on his knees or a zone sitting Diggs who rolls for another yard. 
 

Diggs was ranked 26th in YAC last year. Dont get me wrong, Josh is amazing at hitting stationary targets. But when it comes to guys on the run, he tends to put it into their chest. I still can’t figure out why this hasn’t been addressed. It’s been a thing since his first year. 

 

That 36 yd pass to gabe in stride going into the end zone looked pretty dam good to me !! Just saying . And those passes to Cook in the open field looked good too !! 

Edited by T master
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted (edited)

Two types of throws...

 

Throws that travel air distance

 

And rhythm throws 

 

Josh throws comeback routes at the sidelines ... hitch routes , and long crossing routes... posts ... He scrambles and hits receivers ad libbing 

 

None of that is great for yards after catch... They're good for long completions though

 

YAC is built on routes under 5-7 yards.. rub routes , mesh concepts , WR screens , 

 

You catch a ball 3 yards down the field and run for 7... Josh would just rather throw the ball 11 yd down field 

Edited by Buffalo716
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 2
Posted

Hard to catch a ball thrown with the velocity that Allen has in stride. Any kind of looking upfield too soon is going to result in a ball glancing off a guys hands and possibly getting picked. And we have seen that many times over the years.

Posted
1 hour ago, Big Turk said:

A lot of deep crossers end up near the sideline so the receiver takes a few steps and is OOB.  

 

A lot of routes are stop and comebacks which are not going to get a lot of YAC.

 

He doesn't throw as many checkdowns to backs who gain 10-15 yards after the catch or screens where they are behind the LOS so they have lots of space to run.  

 

The offense is designed differently and relies more on Allen using his arm to gain those extra 5-6 yards versus the receivers running the extra 5 or 6 yards.  

 

Unsure why some people continuously keep harping on this as if there is something wrong.  Nothing is wrong, it's just an offense that isn't designed to rack up huge YAC numbers.  Allen hit Davis in stride 35 yards downfield in the corner of the endzone yesterday but got 0 YAC yards.  Would it have made you feel better if his arm was weaker and he hit him at the 12 yard line and he picked up 10 YAC yards to the 2 before being shoved out of bounds and then they had to settle for a FG?

 

Essentially...stop trying to manufacture problems that aren't actually problems.

Completely agree.  Allen’s huge arm, and the nature of our deep attack,  basically make him a target thrower.  Which is fine with me.  I’ll take Diggs in the 4Q in Detroit over a mediocre talent who racks up YAC yards.  My only beef on YAC lies in the screen game, but that’s a different topic altogether. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, BuffaloBillyG said:

Hard to catch a ball thrown with the velocity that Allen has in stride. Any kind of looking upfield too soon is going to result in a ball glancing off a guys hands and possibly getting picked. And we have seen that many times over the years.

Pretty much this.  Allen throws rockets that get where they need to go and can fit in windows that basically no other QB could do, but they're very difficult to catch and any ball placed in front of the receiver where he has to catch it purely with his hands runs the risk of things going horribly wrong.

  • Agree 2
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, WotAGuy said:

I think some of it is the receivers - Diggs is great, but he really isn’t a good open field runner.  He’s mostly looking to protect the ball and himself it seems, which is ok by me.  But I have noticed the same thing about YAC with this team. 

I noticed that with Diggs yesterday and he does a very good job of that.  He is not going to try  for a Dawson Knox roll over a defender.  I was impressed they was he can do that, very Russell Wilson like in his prime.

Edited by RoyBatty is alive
Posted
54 minutes ago, T master said:

 

That 36 yd [ass to gabe in stride going into the end zone looked pretty dam good to me !! Just saying . And those passes to Cook in the open field looked good too !! 

36 yd what? that's dumb thicc!

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Big Turk said:

A lot of deep crossers end up near the sideline so the receiver takes a few steps and is OOB.  

 

A lot of routes are stop and comebacks which are not going to get a lot of YAC.

 

He doesn't throw as many checkdowns to backs who gain 10-15 yards after the catch or screens where they are behind the LOS so they have lots of space to run.  

 

The offense is designed differently and relies more on Allen using his arm to gain those extra 5-6 yards versus the receivers running the extra 5 or 6 yards.  

 

Unsure why some people continuously keep harping on this as if there is something wrong.  Nothing is wrong, it's just an offense that isn't designed to rack up huge YAC numbers.  Allen hit Davis in stride 35 yards downfield in the corner of the endzone yesterday but got 0 YAC yards.  Would it have made you feel better if his arm was weaker and he hit him at the 12 yard line and he picked up 10 YAC yards to the 2 before being shoved out of bounds and then they had to settle for a FG?

 

Essentially...stop trying to manufacture problems that aren't actually problems.

I agree with a lot of what you’re saying. Boundary routes and throws to the end zone don’t have YAC. So you see as an imperfect measurement for success. 
 

but what you can’t deny is our comeback, checkdown offense leaves us in A LOT of third and longs. And it’s great when we’re completing them and famine when we’re not. 
 

im not trying to “create a problem” but I’m not going to view everything with rose tinted glasses when we beat up some scrubs. 
 

these are the things that bite us. 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Dislike 1
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, quinnearlysghost88 said:

I agree with a lot of what you’re saying. Boundary routes and throws to the end zone don’t have YAC. So you see as an imperfect measurement for success. 
 

but what you can’t deny is our comeback, checkdown offense leaves us in A LOT of third and longs. And it’s great when we’re completing them and famine when we’re not. 
 

im not trying to “create a problem” but I’m not going to view everything with rose tinted glasses when we beat up some scrubs. 
 

these are the things that bite us. 

 

We are the best team in the NFL on 3rd downs over the past season plus this year(20 games-17 last year and 3 this year) converting over 50% of them...and I believe were 2nd the year before that in the high 40% range.

Edited by Big Turk
Posted
1 hour ago, Big Turk said:

A lot of deep crossers end up near the sideline so the receiver takes a few steps and is OOB.  

 

A lot of routes are stop and comebacks which are not going to get a lot of YAC.

 

He doesn't throw as many checkdowns to backs who gain 10-15 yards after the catch or screens where they are behind the LOS so they have lots of space to run.  

 

The offense is designed differently and relies more on Allen using his arm to gain those extra 5-6 yards versus the receivers running the extra 5 or 6 yards.  

 

Unsure why some people continuously keep harping on this as if there is something wrong.  Nothing is wrong, it's just an offense that isn't designed to rack up huge YAC numbers.  Allen hit Davis in stride 35 yards downfield in the corner of the endzone yesterday but got 0 YAC yards.  Would it have made you feel better if his arm was weaker and he hit him at the 12 yard line and he picked up 10 YAC yards to the 2 before being shoved out of bounds and then they had to settle for a FG?

 

Essentially...stop trying to manufacture problems that aren't actually problems.

 

Great points.

 

I'd also add that between Josh's deep ball ability and running ability, teams play us differently.

 

They keep Safeties deep to prevent the deep plays, and that allows them to keep the catches in front of them and come up and make the tackle.

 

Also, teams keep an LB around to spy on Josh, so you get an extra tackler roaming around the short middle. Free to slide to where the ball is going and help make the tackle.

 

All in all, not a problem.

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
Just now, DrDawkinstein said:

 

Great points.

 

I'd also add that between Josh's deep ball ability and running ability, teams play us differently.

 

They keep Safeties deep to prevent the deep plays, and that allows them to keep the catches in front of them and come up and make the tackle.

 

Also, teams keep an LB around to spy on Josh, so you get an extra tackler roaming around the short middle. Free to slide to where the ball is going and help make the tackle.

 

All in all, not a problem.

 

 

Yes...Bills attack vertically while most teams attack horizontally, which gives them more running room on shorter throws.

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, quinnearlysghost88 said:

We all watch other teams play aside from the Bills. We’re able to see teams hit WRs in stride and make big plays. 
 

meanwhile our big plays are stationary catches. 20 yard strikes to a Knox on his knees or a zone sitting Diggs who rolls for another yard. 
 

Diggs was ranked 26th in YAC last year. Dont get me wrong, Josh is amazing at hitting stationary targets. But when it comes to guys on the run, he tends to put it into their chest. I still can’t figure out why this hasn’t been addressed. It’s been a thing since his first year. 

 

What if I told you YAC is meaningless?

 

Mind Blown GIF

 

YAC is for QBs with noodle arms.

Edited by PromoTheRobot
  • Like (+1) 3
  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, quinnearlysghost88 said:

We all watch other teams play aside from the Bills. We’re able to see teams hit WRs in stride and make big plays. 
 

meanwhile our big plays are stationary catches. 20 yard strikes to a Knox on his knees or a zone sitting Diggs who rolls for another yard. 
 

Diggs was ranked 26th in YAC last year. Dont get me wrong, Josh is amazing at hitting stationary targets. But when it comes to guys on the run, he tends to put it into their chest. I still can’t figure out why this hasn’t been addressed. It’s been a thing since his first year. 

 

Really?

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...