Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

 

Kind of surprised Kincaid was in on 35 snaps. Seemed like way less when watching live. As always when it happens the standard disclaimer that the counts may be skewed a bit due to Buffalo resting starters in the second half.

 

What stands out to you?

Posted

Need to see more shakir (faster hines ward, Mr clutch underneath / first down chain mover)

 

and Sherrfield ( a hard nosed SOB over the middle / great blocker with speed) 

 

MOrE!

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, balln said:

Need to see more shakir (faster hines ward, Mr clutch underneath / first down chain mover)

 

and Sherrfield ( a hard nosed SOB over the middle / great blocker with speed) 

 

MOrE!

Sherfield is someone I would love to see more of. I think he could be a factor. 

Posted
39 minutes ago, BuffaloBillyG said:

 

 

Kind of surprised Kincaid was in on 35 snaps. Seemed like way less when watching live. As always when it happens the standard disclaimer that the counts may be skewed a bit due to Buffalo resting starters in the second half.

 

What stands out to you?

I know people love the idea of Kincaid being Kelce Jr. but I think Shakir needs more reps.  Dude still seems like the Beasley replacement Josh needs imo. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

Just in general I think we need to get our TE involved in the passing game more. Just based on snap counts we seem to be running a lot of 2 TE sets. That doesn’t do much good if defenses don’t respect them as an option in the passing game.

 

On a similar note, more plays to possession receivers like Knox, Kincaid, Sherfield, and Shakir would be beneficial. We put a lot of value on the fast and look over the sure handed sometimes. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Mango said:

On a similar note, more plays to possession receivers like Knox, Kincaid, Sherfield, and Shakir would be beneficial. We put a lot of value on the fast and look over the sure handed sometimes. 

 

One would hope that this running game reliance the last couple of weeks is a bluff to bring these other parts out in more crucial games. You want to have some level of rushing, but to marry in more short receptions would also push and pull the defensive backfield and force them to consider alternatives to 2 deep.

 

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...