daz28 Posted February 13 Posted February 13 13 minutes ago, Doc said: Naive or delusional? Tough choice... The easy choice is transparency, but for some reason, I don't think he will make the easy choice. His fanbois will cheer that he didn't cave just for the sake of not caving. Maybe Musk can thank them for giving him plausible deniability with a free red checkmark. We'll call it the reichmark.
JDHillFan Posted February 13 Posted February 13 24 minutes ago, daz28 said: That's naive. Everyone knew what would be happening after Nov 6th. If we could get to the source of who finalized the deal, then we'd know all we need to know. Guess who has the ability to go into the federal database, and exonerate himself anytime he wishes?
daz28 Posted February 13 Posted February 13 (edited) 14 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: What do you think the odds are that the guy who finalized that was one of the guys who was fired, and is no longer part of the State Department? Are you a bettin man? After all it was Biden's administration, so little chance there was any corruption, right? Remember, you're the guy who agrees we have no need for those $400M SUV's. How bad would it hurt if you found out Elon was corrupt? Edited February 13 by daz28
Doc Posted February 14 Posted February 14 1 hour ago, daz28 said: What do you think the odds are that the guy who finalized that was one of the guys who was fired, and is no longer part of the State Department? Are you a bettin man? After all it was Biden's administration, so little chance there was any corruption, right? Remember, you're the guy who agrees we have no need for those $400M SUV's. How bad would it hurt if you found out Elon was corrupt? Trump isn't an EV guy. That's why they're now saying the deal is unlikely to be honored. You're saying the guy who finalized the deal did it all for Musk? Interesting theory...
daz28 Posted February 14 Posted February 14 Just now, Doc said: Trump isn't an EV guy. That's why they're now saying the deal is unlikely to be honored. You're saying the guy who finalized the deal did it all for Musk? Interesting theory... I'm saying I want details. First, wth were they for. Second, who approved it, and how in the FFFF did Elon Musk not know about it. Third, who deleted Tesla from the document. Of course they're now saying it won't be honored, but we'll never know if it was because Don's "not an EV guy", especially if we get no details. Won't be expecting the press to be able to find out either. He hates them and leakers.
Doc Posted February 14 Posted February 14 20 minutes ago, daz28 said: I'm saying I want details. First, wth were they for. Second, who approved it, and how in the FFFF did Elon Musk not know about it. Third, who deleted Tesla from the document. Of course they're now saying it won't be honored, but we'll never know if it was because Don's "not an EV guy", especially if we get no details. Won't be expecting the press to be able to find out either. He hates them and leakers. You won't get details saying "I was trying to save my job so I threw Musk a bone even though he's not POTUS and the actual POTUS doesn't like EVs."
Homelander Posted February 14 Posted February 14 8 hours ago, SCBills said: Imagine a government that is transparent about where our money goes.. How ironic to complain about government transparency while ignoring that the current administration fired the director of the Office of Government Ethics, the Office of Special Counsel, and 19 inspectors general. 8 hours ago, SCBills said: nonsense about SpaceX or Tesla This is nonsense. There are specific laws governing this situation (18 U.S.C. § 208). Imagine if George Soros were given this same level of access to our financial and digital infrastructure.
aristocrat Posted February 14 Posted February 14 37 minutes ago, Homelander said: How ironic to complain about government transparency while ignoring that the current administration fired the director of the Office of Government Ethics, the Office of Special Counsel, and 19 inspectors general. This is nonsense. There are specific laws governing this situation (18 U.S.C. § 208). Imagine if George Soros were given this same level of access to our financial and digital infrastructure. you mean fire the people that have been watching over the corrupt ***** going on? Oh no how sad. So awful. It’s like nazi Germany.
Homelander Posted February 14 Posted February 14 3 minutes ago, aristocrat said: you mean fire the people that have been watching over the corrupt ***** going on? Oh no how sad. So awful. It’s like nazi Germany. During his first term, Trump followed the same pattern: firing officials without replacing them, just look at what happened with CARES Act.
aristocrat Posted February 14 Posted February 14 9 minutes ago, Homelander said: During his first term, Trump followed the same pattern: firing officials without replacing them, just look at what happened with CARES Act. Whataboutism lol
Orlando Buffalo Posted February 14 Posted February 14 I get why Dems love the guy if this is any kind of indication of who he is 1
daz28 Posted February 14 Posted February 14 1 hour ago, Doc said: You won't get details saying "I was trying to save my job so I threw Musk a bone even though he's not POTUS and the actual POTUS doesn't like EVs." No, I'm saying that this guy knew he was staying.
Doc Posted February 14 Posted February 14 17 minutes ago, daz28 said: No, I'm saying that this guy knew he was staying. So you're saying that he did it for Musk? Remember that this was before the "President Musk" crap.
daz28 Posted February 14 Posted February 14 5 minutes ago, Doc said: So you're saying that he did it for Musk? Remember that this was before the "President Musk" crap. No I'm saying it's possible. I told you my 3 main concerns. How could Elon Musk not know about a government order for $400M worth of armored electric vehicles? C'mon man!!!
JDHillFan Posted February 14 Posted February 14 4 minutes ago, daz28 said: No I'm saying it's possible. I told you my 3 main concerns. How could Elon Musk not know about a government order for $400M worth of armored electric vehicles? C'mon man!!! Seems implausible. On the other hand, it was a forecast of an order. No order currently exists.
K D Posted February 17 Posted February 17 A white man with a maga hat that doesn't want to shake hands with a black man was a "funny" character on the 50 year anniversary special for SNL. They will keep losing elections if that's how they see the majority of the country 2 1
Recommended Posts