daz28 Posted February 12 Posted February 12 2 minutes ago, Doc said: She's my State's Rep. That's probably the most flattering picture there is of her. Least someone did her a solid.
Doc Posted February 12 Posted February 12 7 minutes ago, daz28 said: Least someone did her a solid. Well, as much as a solid can be done for her in that regard... 1
Albwan Posted February 12 Posted February 12 On 2/8/2025 at 1:59 PM, B-Man said: It's one thing to be stupid, it's a whole other level when you keep doubling down on that same stupidity.
Wacka Posted February 12 Posted February 12 3 hours ago, JDHillFan said: The Dem comeback is on! Is she still alive? She is Rosa DeLauro D-CT. She had just taken her seat when I left CT 30 years ago. She looked the same but just a little less wrinkly then. Her hair was dark then. Now the blue is to hide the gray and to honor the Huskies?
Albwan Posted February 12 Posted February 12 I say republicans should get reparations for being subjected to the ####### racist lefturds in this country.
daz28 Posted February 12 Posted February 12 7 minutes ago, Albwan said: It's one thing to be stupid, it's a whole other level when you keep doubling down on that same stupidity. While affirmative action is a terrible idea in some circumstances, identifying and taking measures to correct inherent racism in a society is not. Calling the latter racism is just trumpian white supremacist logic from the 70's. 1
JDHillFan Posted February 13 Posted February 13 I’m sure he does a good job on behalf of his district.
JDHillFan Posted February 13 Posted February 13 4 hours ago, Albwan said: I say republicans should get reparations for being subjected to the ####### racist lefturds in this country. 1
Albwan Posted February 13 Posted February 13 14 hours ago, daz28 said: While affirmative action is a terrible idea in some circumstances, identifying and taking measures to correct inherent racism in a society is not. Calling the latter racism is just trumpian white supremacist logic from the 70's. No democrat blacks despise white people, it's not the other way around. And it's got a lot to do with a cash grab. Inherent racism..is not forcing unqualified people into positions they aren't qualified for, in fact it's exactly the opposite. 1
SCBills Posted February 13 Posted February 13 Dems going all in on attacking DOGE is wild. Cant wait to see them line up behind “large scale social deception” payments to Reuters.
Roundybout Posted February 13 Posted February 13 1 hour ago, SCBills said: Dems going all in on attacking DOGE is wild. Cant wait to see them line up behind “large scale social deception” payments to Reuters. Another poster who doesn’t understand the difference between a media outlet and an analysis product, and has thus been programmed to be mad. Sad!
SCBills Posted February 13 Posted February 13 45 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Another poster who doesn’t understand the difference between a media outlet and an analysis product, and has thus been programmed to be mad. Sad! And here you are, right on cue. This is taxpayer money. Imagine a government that is transparent about where our money goes.. And you’re free to be in favor of these expenditures. Most of us aren’t.
Roundybout Posted February 13 Posted February 13 1 minute ago, SCBills said: And here you are, right on cue. This is taxpayer money. Imagine a government that is transparent about where our money goes.. And you’re free to be in favor of these expenditures. Most of us aren’t. The government has always published where the money goes. Read the budget. USAID did too. You were programmed in about two days. I am opposed to giving Elon more money.
SCBills Posted February 13 Posted February 13 2 minutes ago, Roundybout said: The government has always published where the money goes. Read the budget. USAID did too. You were programmed in about two days. I am opposed to giving Elon more money. Lectures on programming Finishes point by saying he’s opposed to giving Elon more money What money is he getting by doing this? Thats simply a Dem talking point not based in reality. Im sure you’ll counter with some nonsense about SpaceX or Tesla, but that’s unrelated to what we discussing. Its actually a good thing to be transparent about our tax dollars and then cut waste. What a bizarre hill to die on… 1 1
Roundybout Posted February 13 Posted February 13 1 minute ago, SCBills said: Lectures on programming Finishes point by saying he’s opposed to giving Elon more money What money is he getting by doing this? Thats simply a Dem talking point not based in reality. Im sure you’ll counter with some nonsense about SpaceX or Tesla, but that’s unrelated to what we discussing. Its actually a good thing to be transparent about our tax dollars and then cut waste. What a bizarre hill to die on… As I said. You’ve been programmed. They are removing useful programs and replacing them with stuff like this. The budget is never going to be balanced.
SCBills Posted February 13 Posted February 13 7 minutes ago, Roundybout said: As I said. You’ve been programmed. They are removing useful programs and replacing them with stuff like this. The budget is never going to be balanced. Oh, ok…
Roundybout Posted February 13 Posted February 13 1 minute ago, SCBills said: Oh, ok… Thats nice. This was during the transition when the State Department revised its procurement forecast. Do you not think it’s a conflict of interest for Mr. DOGE to be taking these contracts whilst working for Trump? He’s pushing for it because Tesla is failing epically in Europe.
Doc Posted February 13 Posted February 13 4 hours ago, Roundybout said: Thats nice. This was during the transition when the State Department revised its procurement forecast. Do you not think it’s a conflict of interest for Mr. DOGE to be taking these contracts whilst working for Trump? He’s pushing for it because Tesla is failing epically in Europe. That's nice. The SD was still all Biden's people at that time.
daz28 Posted February 13 Posted February 13 24 minutes ago, Doc said: That's nice. The SD was still all Biden's people at that time. That's naive. Everyone knew what would be happening after Nov 6th. If we could get to the source of who finalized the deal, then we'd know all we need to know. Guess who has the ability to go into the federal database, and exonerate himself anytime he wishes?
Doc Posted February 13 Posted February 13 4 minutes ago, daz28 said: That's naive. Everyone knew what would be happening after Nov 6th. If we could get to the source of who finalized the deal, then we'd know all we need to know. Guess who has the ability to go into the federal database, and exonerate himself anytime he wishes? Naive or delusional? Tough choice... 1
Recommended Posts