Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Some thought.  First amendment rights have not been interpreted by then judicial system to be absolute.  The article posted also listed republican numbers which adds some perspective missing in the OP.  Also you can interpret the questions in different ways, they are broad general question that leave details open to interpretation.  Also the website linked is known To be pro conservative.  

Posted
8 hours ago, JDHillFan said:

Nice job ladies. 

There isn't a law on the books already from terrorists entering the US?

Posted
19 minutes ago, Doc Brown said:

There isn't a law on the books already from terrorists entering the US?

“Involved in Oct 7 attack”. 
 

I’m certain there are laws to keep terrorists out. I don’t believe they are necessarily enforced at our southern border. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, JDHillFan said:

“Involved in Oct 7 attack”. 
 

I’m certain there are laws to keep terrorists out. I don’t believe they are necessarily enforced at our southern border. 

So if you're a terrorist that wasn't involved in the October 7th attack.  You're good?  Seems like a redundant bill meant to be symbolic.  Glad those two further revealed themselves as stubborn idiots.

  • Agree 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, US Egg said:

Nothing new here, Dems help rapists hide:

 

 

 

If this doesn’t sound like a parity account I don’t what does then!

The left are a bunch of fruitcakes!

Posted
Just now, Westside said:

If this doesn’t sound like a parity account I don’t what does then!

The left are a bunch of fruitcakes!

 

 


 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted
11 hours ago, Westside said:

My point just proven. 👆

 

No one knows if it was even sexual assault.  There is zero evidence it ever happened.

  • Agree 2
×
×
  • Create New...