JaCrispy Posted December 20, 2024 Posted December 20, 2024 2 minutes ago, B-Man said: The donors want “their” money 1
Doc Posted December 29, 2024 Posted December 29, 2024 17 minutes ago, B-Man said: That they're not fighting and trying to figure out why they lost should be the most concerning thing to them. Shows they haven't learned a thing.
B-Man Posted January 2 Posted January 2 On 12/29/2024 at 11:46 AM, Doc said: That they're not fighting and trying to figure out why they lost should be the most concerning thing to them. Shows they haven't learned a thing. The Democrats’ Culture Denialism They just don’t get it. By Ruy Teixeira Jan 02, 2025 In the wake of the Democrats’ drubbing at the hands of Donald Trump and the GOP, you’d assume the party would be all-in on a fundamental rethink, starting with some serious soul-searching on how the party came to be so out of sync with the majority of America on key cultural questions. Questions like: Is America really a “white supremacist” society? What does “structural racism” even mean and does it explain all the socioeconomic problems of nonwhites? Is anyone who raises questions about immigration levels a racist? Are personal pronouns necessary and something that should be popularized if not demanded? Are transwomen exactly the same as biological women and are those who question such a claim simply “haters” who should be expunged from polite society? For each of these questions, the answer for the overwhelming majority of Americans is an obvious no. But in elite Democratic circles, it’s a different story. For a party pondering its unpopularity, you might think that this gap would be a good place to start. Well, if the two months since the election is anything to go by, you’d be wrong. Instead, much of the party is maneuvering to change as little as possible on the cultural front. Why? Because fundamentally today’s Democrats are culture denialists. That is, they do not consider cultural issues real issues. They are typically viewed as politically motivated distractions or as expressions of something else entirely (i.e., racism, sexism, xenophobia, transphobia, etc.) They are not treated as issues that need to be dealt with on their own terms. https://www.liberalpatriot.com/p/the-democrats-culture-denialism 1
JDHillFan Posted January 2 Posted January 2 1 hour ago, B-Man said: Questions like: Is America really a “white supremacist” society? What does “structural racism” even mean and does it explain all the socioeconomic problems of nonwhites? Is anyone who raises questions about immigration levels a racist? Are personal pronouns necessary and something that should be popularized if not demanded? Are transwomen exactly the same as biological women and are those who question such a claim simply “haters” who should be expunged from polite society? For each of these questions, the answer for the overwhelming majority of Americans is an obvious no. But in elite Democratic circles, it’s a different story. For a party pondering its unpopularity, you might think that this gap would be a good place to start. This is incomprehensible to some of the lefties here. 1
B-Man Posted January 2 Posted January 2 The current Democratic discourse is rife with examples. Here’s Massachusetts Democratic Representative Jim McGovern as tweeted out by progressive group CAP Action: Get it? No one would normally object to Democratic policies around trans issues or immigration issues. Backlash against them is just ginned up by Republicans for nefarious political purposes. The real issue is the depredations of big corporations. The clear implication is that Democrats don’t need to change their positions on either trans and immigration issues but instead should point out to befuddled voters that these are non-issues and that their real enemy is corporate America. https://www.liberalpatriot.com/p/the-democrats-culture-denialism
Steve O Posted January 4 Posted January 4 On 12/28/2024 at 6:52 PM, B-Man said: Yup, wouldn't change a thing 1
B-Man Posted January 6 Posted January 6 LEADING? Schumer dodges when asked who’s leading the Democratic Party. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/senate/3276660/schumer-dodges-asked-who-leader-democratic-party/#google_vignette
Big Blitz Posted January 10 Author Posted January 10 On 9/24/2023 at 4:36 PM, Big Blitz said: Good night. We told you. Remember this every time they cry about Trump being a fascist. The only right the left thinks you have is to abort your baby. Absolutely nothing else matters to them they are too far gone. Anyone voting Democrat still at this point needs to have their head examined. Hate Trump all you want. Hate the things he wants to do like eliminating income tax or annex Canada. None of it puts your actual freedoms at risk. People that support the things these Ds support are just a few steps away from North Korea. That’s their logical conclusion. 1
B-Man Posted January 11 Posted January 11 Fetterman hasn't abandoned his legislative priorities, but he has consistently approached his duties with a sense of representing the entire Pennsylvania electorate. Suddenly, that approach seems to spreading as the reverberations of a stinging presidential defeat continue. While some still plan to oppose Trump's agenda and nominees strenuously, the appetite among Democrats for La Resistance obstruction has waned considerably.
Chaos Posted January 11 Posted January 11 33 minutes ago, B-Man said: Fetterman hasn't abandoned his legislative priorities, but he has consistently approached his duties with a sense of representing the entire Pennsylvania electorate. Suddenly, that approach seems to spreading as the reverberations of a stinging presidential defeat continue. While some still plan to oppose Trump's agenda and nominees strenuously, the appetite among Democrats for La Resistance obstruction has waned considerably. The future pope of Greenland 1
Recommended Posts