Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
21 minutes ago, dma0034 said:

 

It's just odd that the defense gets it. Allow the Offense to keep it at the 20

They should just get it where the fumble happened. Such a dumb rule.

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, BuffaloBillyG said:

At least on the field Jalen Carter looks like he's going to be everything I was assured Ed Oliver was.

Yeh but Jalen fell for character reasons to the point where three teams in front of the eagles took him off their draft board the guy has two civil cases pending against him 

Edited by 78thealltimegreat
Posted
Just now, 78thealltimegreat said:

Yeh but Jalen fell for character reasons to the point where three teams in front of the eagles took him off their draft board the guy has two civil cases pending against him 

Which is why I specified "on the field".

Posted
5 minutes ago, 78thealltimegreat said:

Yeh but Jalen fell for character reasons to the point where three teams in front of the eagles took him off their draft board the guy has two civil cases pending against him 

Who cares. It’s not going to derail his playing career. It’s professional sports not the ethics Olympics

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, chongli said:

 

https://www.foxsports.com/stories/nfl/nfl-official-explains-why-one-of-footballs-worst-rules-exists-in-the-first-place

 

“Because the goal line is involved — and this is a consistent application of the impetus rule,” Blandino said. “Impetus is the force that puts the ball into an end zone. So if a team provides the impetus that puts a ball into their opponent’s end zone . . . then they are responsible for it. They’re responsible for it. And if the ball gets out of bounds through the end zone then it is a touchback.

 

[…]

 

“Now that may seem like an egregious penalty but again, think about it, they put the ball into their opponent’s end zone,” Blandino said. “If it’s not fourth down or inside two minutes, if they recover it, it’s a score. So that’s potentially a big play, so the penalty for not recovering it . . . has to be big as well. That’s why it’s a touchback. That’s consistent with other loose balls that go into an opponent’s end zone. Kicks, punts, fumbles, backward passes.”

 

“You’re responsible for putting the ball into your opponent’s end zone, you’re responsible for recovering it,” Blandino said. “If you don’t and it goes out of bounds or the defense recovers, they’ve defended their goal line, and they get a touchback.”

 

 

But the D does not necessarily have to cause the fumble for the rule to take effect.

 

Why is the goal line the overwhelming factor?  Why not have the D get the ball every time the O fumbles out of bounce?

It's a weird rule.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, 78thealltimegreat said:

You do know what happened right? 

He street raced. And the other car crashed and someone died

 

eagles fans don’t seem to mind 

Edited by balln
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...