Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I think the Bills win, but we will have to sweat this one out much more than anyone here is comfortable with. 

 

One extra bad bounce of the ball or dumb decision could be an L.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Boatdrinks said:

Blue on white please….or White on white 

 

As i said prior to the Jets game, I think the only solace to a loss would be they can ditch the dumb superstition that the Blue/Blue uniforms are good luck.  

This just in...They suck and are ugly.

Blue over white this week as the home uniform as it always should be.  Stop messing with the blue/blue nonsense.

  • Like (+1) 5
  • Eyeroll 1
  • Agree 1
Posted

Prediction: more heavy sets, more Latavius Murray and Damien Harris, with support from Gilliam at FB/TE.

The Broncos got a lot of production out of Javonte Williams (strong inside runner coming off an ACL) and even Samaje Perrine. The Broncos O line is also a work in progress, but they moved the Raiders around on run plays pretty effectively. Pass rush with Crosby going wild is their strength, defending the run is not.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

Prediction: more heavy sets, more Latavius Murray and Damien Harris, with support from Gilliam at FB/TE.

The Broncos got a lot of production out of Javonte Williams (strong inside runner coming off an ACL) and even Samaje Perrine. The Broncos O line is also a work in progress, but they moved the Raiders around on run plays pretty effectively. Pass rush with Crosby going wild is their strength, defending the run is not.

I know I'm in the minority, but I'm in favor of Buffalo running more in general. Not talking being a ground and pound team by any means...but going from 80/20 pass to run ratio to 65/35ish would help limit opportunity for Allen to turn the ball over.

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Agree 6
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted

I really can't bring myself to care about this game.  I expect to win, but won't be shocked if we lose.  Even if we win, it still won't answer solve any of the concerns I have about Josh and Dorsey because the Raiders aren't a team that would create the challenges those two can't seem to overcome.

 

I'm in a crap mental state and I'll own it.  I need Josh to prove he can take the easy stuff, and there aren't many teams that will make him do that.  Until those games happen, I just feel blah

  • Like (+1) 5
  • Eyeroll 1
  • Angry 1
  • Agree 9
Posted

https://clutchpoints.com/raiders-4-causes-concern-despite-surprising-win-broncos

 

The Raiders' interior defensive line had difficulties stopping the run against the Broncos. Even though they only allowed 94 rushing yards, they often found themselves getting pushed back by the Broncos' offensive line. Bilal Nichols had a subpar performance, and Jerry Tilley had his fair share of ups and downs. These included jumping Offside on a critical fourth-down play. To address these issues, it might be beneficial to give more playing time to other guys Byron Young and Nesta Jade Silvera. If the Raiders can't shore up their interior run defense, opposing teams might exploit this weakness by just running the ball up the middle.

 

This is what I saw too. A lot of lateral speed, and the outside stuff Sean Payton tried didn't work so well. But the Raiders interior run defense looked soft, and running effectively inside also plays against Crosby's strength - anything slow-developing, you can expect him to appear out of nowhere to disrupt it. He's that good.

1 minute ago, Virgil said:

I really can't bring myself to care about this game.  I expect to win, but won't be shocked if we lose.  Even if we win, it still won't answer solve any of the concerns I have about Josh and Dorsey because the Raiders aren't a team that would create the challenges those two can't seem to overcome.

 

I'm in a crap mental state and I'll own it.  I need Josh to prove he can take the easy stuff, and there aren't many teams that will make him do that.  Until those games happen, I just feel blah

I'm the opposite. Looking forward to a good showing at home against a team we matchup pretty well with.

The Raiders are better than what folks predicted. Jimmy G. looked healthy and efficient. They have two forces (Jacobs and Davante) on offense, and one force (Crosby) on defense, but not a lot of standout individual performers other than that. I expect us to be ready, to have seen what the Broncos were able to exploit in a game they should've won (Payton's show-off onside kick to start the game didn't help, and his hand-picked kicker missed a PAT), and to put things on the right track.

Go Bills!

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 2
Posted (edited)
19 minutes ago, Virgil said:

I really can't bring myself to care about this game.  I expect to win, but won't be shocked if we lose.  Even if we win, it still won't answer solve any of the concerns I have about Josh and Dorsey because the Raiders aren't a team that would create the challenges those two can't seem to overcome.

 

I'm in a crap mental state and I'll own it.  I need Josh to prove he can take the easy stuff, and there aren't many teams that will make him do that.  Until those games happen, I just feel blah

Funny you say that right after I read this article. It discusses defending Mahomes but applies to Allen as well.

 

The NFL is ever evolving. Now the style is big armed QBs and explosive fast WRs. So defenses will adjust and that that away. What's the next evolution? Teams have across the league gone to lighter, faster coverage LBers to help.  I think the answer to help Allen is to have a consistent reliable ground game to take advantage, make teams defend it and take advantage where they can through the air in spots. A guy like KC has with Pacheco. Not flashy but can take advantage of a light box and deal punishment. Scheme guys open underneath and get those valuable RAC yards.

 

"It's high risk, throwing the ball all the way down the field, maybe in double coverage or if it's 40 yards in the air," Steelers quarterback Mitch Trubisky said. "Rather, (you can) throw it five yards and let that guy run the rest of the way, so the run after catch has been a huge emphasis ...You see the really good teams who are scoring a lot of points. They're not necessarily always throwing it deep. They're throwing it underneath and letting the guy run the rest of the way."

 

This quote by Trubisky illustrates in my mind why a guy like Tua is lighting up scoreboards and stat boxes, while QBs like Allen and Herbert are hit and miss. Must be nice to have a coach that can be ahead of offensive trends.

Edited by BuffaloBillyG
  • Like (+1) 6
  • Agree 1
  • Simon pinned this topic
Posted
22 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

 

I'm the opposite. Looking forward to a good showing at home against a team we matchup pretty well with.

The Raiders are better than what folks predicted. Jimmy G. looked healthy and efficient. They have two forces (Jacobs and Davante) on offense, and one force (Crosby) on defense, but not a lot of standout individual performers other than that. I expect us to be ready, to have seen what the Broncos were able to exploit in a game they should've won (Payton's show-off onside kick to start the game didn't help, and his hand-picked kicker missed a PAT), and to put things on the right track.

Go Bills!

 

To me, what would it prove?  The Raiders don't present the threat to Josh and Dorsey that would make them prove they've made the proper adjustments.  The Raiders just aren't on that level.  No, the Jets overall aren't either, but their defense is.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
22 minutes ago, Virgil said:

I really can't bring myself to care about this game.  I expect to win, but won't be shocked if we lose.  Even if we win, it still won't answer solve any of the concerns I have about Josh and Dorsey because the Raiders aren't a team that would create the challenges those two can't seem to overcome.

 

I'm in a crap mental state and I'll own it.  I need Josh to prove he can take the easy stuff, and there aren't many teams that will make him do that.  Until those games happen, I just feel blah

Last year at this time the Bengals were dead in the water and the Chiefs were fatally flawed without Tyreek. Going into week 2, Buffalo was destined to lay waste to all opponents on their way to a perfect season and super bowl victory.  Its a long season and week 1 isn't any indicator of future success.  

  • Like (+1) 10
  • Agree 4
Posted
5 minutes ago, Virgil said:

 

To me, what would it prove?  The Raiders don't present the threat to Josh and Dorsey that would make them prove they've made the proper adjustments.  The Raiders just aren't on that level.  No, the Jets overall aren't either, but their defense is.

I don't need the bills to prove they are a super bowl team in week 2. I want to see a fun team play a fun game and win. Then I want to enjoy the other week 2 games and look forward to week 3

  • Like (+1) 7
Posted
5 minutes ago, Virgil said:

 

To me, what would it prove?  The Raiders don't present the threat to Josh and Dorsey that would make them prove they've made the proper adjustments.  The Raiders just aren't on that level.  No, the Jets overall aren't either, but their defense is.

Well, it would show that our offense is effective and dangerous against a non-elite defense, which is what the Jets have now. We'll deal with the Jets defense when they come to Buffalo on November 19. 

  • Like (+1) 1
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...