Saxum Posted September 13, 2023 Posted September 13, 2023 https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/38386785/seahawks-add-jason-peters-injures-offensive-tackle Quote The Seahawks signed 41-year-old left tackle Jason Peters to their practice squad, the team announced Tuesday. The addition of Peters comes amid uncertainty about the severity of the injuries that knocked both of Seattle's starting tackles out of the team's season-opening loss. Right tackle Abraham Lucas missed the second half with a sore patella, which also bothered him during training camp. Left tackle Charles Cross left in the third quarter with a sprained big toe. Quote
peterpan Posted September 13, 2023 Posted September 13, 2023 Why isn’t he our starting RT right now 4 1 1 Quote
Dan Darragh Posted September 13, 2023 Posted September 13, 2023 7 minutes ago, peterpan said: Why isn’t he our starting RT right now Because he's 41 years old. Same reason he's not anyone else's. 1 1 2 Quote
John from Riverside Posted September 13, 2023 Posted September 13, 2023 Would bring him in as a back up and never look back 4 Quote
BillsFanForever19 Posted September 13, 2023 Posted September 13, 2023 (edited) 32 minutes ago, peterpan said: Why isn’t he our starting RT right now 24 minutes ago, Dan Darragh said: Because he's 41 years old. Same reason he's not anyone else's. Either a.) He didn't want to come back to Buffalo or b.) Kromer, Beane, and/or McDermott weren't interested in a 41 year old player. He was available and we chose to sign Germain Ifedi instead. If he signed to a Practice Squad deal, it obviously wasn't a money issue. Edited September 13, 2023 by BillsFanForever19 Quote
boyst Posted September 13, 2023 Posted September 13, 2023 (edited) 4 hours ago, BillsFanForever19 said: Either a.) He didn't want to come back to Buffalo or b.) Kromer, Beane, and/or McDermott weren't interested in a 41 year old player. He was available and we chose to sign Germain Ifedi instead. If he signed to a Practice Squad deal, it obviously wasn't a money issue. when we could have signed him he was only intending to sign with a team pre-week 1 if he was going to start or be on the active 53 to enjoy a full year of pay and benefits. but he should have been signed Edited September 13, 2023 by boyst 1 Quote
Miyagi-Do Karate Posted September 13, 2023 Posted September 13, 2023 This is like a real Rocky V moment: started on the practice squad (in Buffalo), and now going back to his roots 20 years later! Quote
Dopey Posted September 13, 2023 Posted September 13, 2023 Sure, Josh blows a game so we should bring in a washed up Tackle. That’s really going to help Josh. Quote
Since1981 Posted September 13, 2023 Posted September 13, 2023 (edited) My head hurts that Bills UFA Jason Peters is getting an NFL check still. Wowza. Have to give that man credit. iPhone had not yet even launched. Edited September 13, 2023 by Since1981 Quote
BarleyNY Posted September 13, 2023 Posted September 13, 2023 27 minutes ago, Dopey said: Sure, Josh blows a game so we should bring in a washed up Tackle. That’s really going to help Josh. Just because QB was the biggest problem on the field Monday night doesn’t mean that RT wasn’t also a problem. Or that RT hasn’t been a problem for quite some time. Quote
Captain Hindsight Posted September 13, 2023 Posted September 13, 2023 1 hour ago, Dan Darragh said: Because he's 41 years old. Same reason he's not anyone else's. Name one bad thing that’s happened to an older player in the last week 2 Quote
Saxum Posted September 13, 2023 Author Posted September 13, 2023 1 hour ago, BarleyNY said: Just because QB was the biggest problem on the field Monday night doesn’t mean that RT wasn’t also a problem. Or that RT hasn’t been a problem for quite some time. He has not played RT with any regularity since he played for Buffalo. He was inserted into game for Dallass when starting RT was injured and then backup Josh Ball was ineffective. Josh Ball (sounds like our offense) however has been kept and Jason Peters went on to Free Agency. As a starting RT? Not a good idea. Backup LT on PS able to elevated? Maybe. He will need time however to get into game shape since he skipped OTAs, training camp and preseason. Quote
Einstein Posted September 13, 2023 Posted September 13, 2023 3 hours ago, Dan Darragh said: Because he's 41 years old. Same reason he's not anyone else's. Seattle signed him to start. He is simply starting on the PS so they don’t have to release a player. He will elevated to the 53. Quote
LABILLBACKER Posted September 13, 2023 Posted September 13, 2023 2 hours ago, Dopey said: Sure, Josh blows a game so we should bring in a washed up Tackle. That’s really going to help Josh. Leaving Spencer in there isn't going to help either. Quote
Dopey Posted September 13, 2023 Posted September 13, 2023 20 minutes ago, LABILLBACKER said: Leaving Spencer in there isn't going to help either. Neither would Jason Peters. JMO. 2 hours ago, BarleyNY said: Just because QB was the biggest problem on the field Monday night doesn’t mean that RT wasn’t also a problem. Or that RT hasn’t been a problem for quite some time. And brining in a washed-up T is going to be the answer? Quote
BarleyNY Posted September 13, 2023 Posted September 13, 2023 (edited) 1 hour ago, Limeaid said: He has not played RT with any regularity since he played for Buffalo. He was inserted into game for Dallass when starting RT was injured and then backup Josh Ball was ineffective. Josh Ball (sounds like our offense) however has been kept and Jason Peters went on to Free Agency. As a starting RT? Not a good idea. Backup LT on PS able to elevated? Maybe. He will need time however to get into game shape since he skipped OTAs, training camp and preseason. He wasn’t the only option for addressing competition at RT. 17 minutes ago, Dopey said: And brining in a washed-up T is going to be the answer? I never said he was my preferred option. He’s just the kind of option left now. Edited September 13, 2023 by BarleyNY Quote
Ridgewaycynic2013 Posted September 13, 2023 Posted September 13, 2023 2 hours ago, MJS said: Why doesn't he want to retire? Needs the qualifying weeks for unemployment insurance? 🤔 1 Quote
YodaMan79 Posted September 13, 2023 Posted September 13, 2023 Good for him that he can still get paid. But if you've watched him over the past 3-4 years, he doesn't stay in games. He's shuffling in and out constantly with minor nagging injuries. He's not a real option that can be counted on to contribute. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.