Over 29 years of fanhood Posted October 1, 2023 Posted October 1, 2023 3 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: U cant make this up. Well perhaps MAGAs can… make up what? Joe is the one bragging on video he was withholding aid to the Ukraine unless they fired their prosecutor- You’re saying he was lying? or you are saying it was just a complete coincidence the guy Joe insisted was removed happened to be investigating the company that just gave bags of cash to his crackhead kid that thought natural gas was flatulence? either way, they have enough to take a swing at a trumpy like impeach and acquittal based on the Pelosi standard. 2
Joe Ferguson forever Posted October 1, 2023 Posted October 1, 2023 (edited) 3 hours ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said: make up what? Joe is the one bragging on video he was withholding aid to the Ukraine unless they fired their prosecutor- You’re saying he was lying? or you are saying it was just a complete coincidence the guy Joe insisted was removed happened to be investigating the company that just gave bags of cash to his crackhead kid that thought natural gas was flatulence? either way, they have enough to take a swing at a trumpy like impeach and acquittal based on the Pelosi standard. "change some names and dollar figures and shuffle a few minor details". other than that, "verbatim". Must have had few too many last nite. tee many martoonis. Edited October 1, 2023 by Joe Ferguson forever
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted October 1, 2023 Posted October 1, 2023 9 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: I read them and interpreted them. Your turn, Counselor. I don't have at hand one of those corny, silly, disparaging labels. That's your game, not mine. But as I said, the words meaning are self evident and clearly hearken to the 14th and the 5th (Umm he's a constitutional lawyer testifying on the constitutionality of the proceedings - u think he might be referencing the constitution?). Only a dummy😁 or liar could not recognize that. Before harkening back to anything else, consider harkening back to what he actually said. 1 1
Doc Posted October 1, 2023 Posted October 1, 2023 (edited) 9 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: Yup, you write and reason just like a real doct😅or Namaste If you're claiming that your writing and reasoning prove you're a doctor...thank goodness you "retired" from medicine. 1 hour ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: Before harkening back to anything else, consider harkening back to what he actually said. Dems don't need facts, just feelz. Their take on the phone call impeachment versus the current situation is hilariously idiotic and hypocritical. Edited October 1, 2023 by Doc 2
BillStime Posted October 1, 2023 Posted October 1, 2023 (edited) 7 hours ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said: make up what? Joe is the one bragging on video he was withholding aid to the Ukraine unless they fired their prosecutor- You’re saying he was lying? or you are saying it was just a complete coincidence the guy Joe insisted was removed happened to be investigating the company that just gave bags of cash to his crackhead kid that thought natural gas was flatulence? either way, they have enough to take a swing at a trumpy like impeach and acquittal based on the Pelosi standard. Holy 💩 - are you and “Doc” the same person? These idiots are still recycling the same hoax from 2019 - jfc get a new psyop - this Biden / Shokin story has expired. Everyone under the sun wanted this corrupt prosecutor removed and these fn idiots think Biden swooped in and was the first to demand his removal. You can’t make this up - it’s what desperate degenerates do when they got nothing else. Edited October 1, 2023 by BillStime 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted October 1, 2023 Posted October 1, 2023 (edited) 2 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: Before harkening back to anything else, consider harkening back to what he actually said. I did. It means what I summarized. How bout u providing your alternative fact summary. Use your own words. You’ve got plenty. But I bet you don’t rise to the challenge…that’s the MAGA m.o. and why u will fail Edited October 1, 2023 by Joe Ferguson forever
BillStime Posted October 1, 2023 Posted October 1, 2023 12 hours ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said: one they invented
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted October 1, 2023 Posted October 1, 2023 8 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: I did. It means what I summarized. How bout u providing your alternative fact summary. Use your own words. You’ve got plenty. But I bet you don’t rise to the challenge…that’s the MAGA m.o. and why u will fail You’re asking me to provide facts alternative to Turley’s comments when you’ve misrepresented what Turley said? I replied on that issue previously, perhaps when you were mid-bender. 🤫 2 1
BillStime Posted October 1, 2023 Posted October 1, 2023 Just now, leh-nerd skin-erd said: You’re asking me to provide facts alternative to Turley’s comments when you’ve misrepresented what Turley said? I replied on that issue previously, perhaps when you were mid-bender. 🤫 Take the L man - you guys got nothing 1 1
John from Riverside Posted October 1, 2023 Posted October 1, 2023 2 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: You’re asking me to provide facts alternative to Turley’s comments when you’ve misrepresented what Turley said? I replied on that issue previously, perhaps when you were mid-bender. 🤫 Misrepresented with Turley said He was asked straight away if he had any evidence that would rise to the level of an impeachment, and he flat out said no I don’t know, but that sounds pretty damning to me 1 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted October 1, 2023 Posted October 1, 2023 4 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: You’re asking me to provide facts alternative to Turley’s comments when you’ve misrepresented what Turley said? I replied on that issue previously, perhaps when you were mid-bender. 🤫 You evaded. It’s what u do? I’ll take that as a concession not that your judgment is necessary… 1
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted October 1, 2023 Posted October 1, 2023 57 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: You evaded. It’s what u do? I’ll take that as a concession not that your judgment is necessary… You can take it and file it where the sun don’t shine, playa! 2 2
Joe Ferguson forever Posted October 1, 2023 Posted October 1, 2023 (edited) 4 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: You can take it and file it where the sun don’t shine, playa! why not just take the challenge? Loosaa....you and the Phins... Edited October 1, 2023 by Joe Ferguson forever 1
aristocrat Posted October 2, 2023 Posted October 2, 2023 12 hours ago, BillStime said: Holy 💩 - are you and “Doc” the same person? These idiots are still recycling the same hoax from 2019 - jfc get a new psyop - this Biden / Shokin story has expired. Everyone under the sun wanted this corrupt prosecutor removed and these fn idiots think Biden swooped in and was the first to demand his removal. You can’t make this up - it’s what desperate degenerates do when they got nothing else. Why was the prosecutor not charged and jailed? Why did the company owner who hired hunter keep the money he stole, and move to Morocco to live a nice life? Please explain that series of events 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted October 2, 2023 Posted October 2, 2023 4 minutes ago, aristocrat said: Why was the prosecutor not charged and jailed? Why did the company owner who hired hunter keep the money he stole, and move to Morocco to live a nice life? Please explain that series of events Hunter is dog crap. No one but Joe denies that... 1
Doc Posted October 2, 2023 Posted October 2, 2023 43 minutes ago, aristocrat said: Why was the prosecutor not charged and jailed? Why did the company owner who hired hunter keep the money he stole, and move to Morocco to live a nice life? Please explain that series of events They can't. The so-called "anti-corruption policy" would have seen to it that Shokin was prosecuted for not prosecuting corruption. And the new prosecutor would have prosecuted people Shokin was allegedly protecting for corruption. Just so that he wouldn't investigate Burisma, which is the only reason idiot boy was on their board. 1
ChiGoose Posted October 2, 2023 Posted October 2, 2023 1 hour ago, aristocrat said: Why was the prosecutor not charged and jailed? Why did the company owner who hired hunter keep the money he stole, and move to Morocco to live a nice life? Please explain that series of events …do you believe that being bad at your job is a criminal offense? 1 1 1
aristocrat Posted October 2, 2023 Posted October 2, 2023 6 hours ago, ChiGoose said: …do you believe that being bad at your job is a criminal offense? Yes if you’re paid to be bad. I don’t believe in coincidences. 1
Tommy Callahan Posted October 2, 2023 Posted October 2, 2023 On 9/29/2023 at 11:14 AM, Tommy Callahan said: lol, a ***** bird provided a great example for my comment above it. https://waysandmeans.house.gov/event/meeting-on-documents-protected-under-internal-revenue-code-section-6103-2/ Same receipts for the "There is no evidence" script
Doc Posted October 2, 2023 Posted October 2, 2023 2 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: …do you believe that being bad at your job is a criminal offense? Ah, so now we're completing changing the narrative (again). Now Shokin was just "bad at his job" and firing him is all that needed to happen. No, he was called "corrupt" by Joke and corruption is a criminal offense. But wasn't prosecuted. Meaning that was a lie ostensibly to prevent him from investigating Burisma. Hence them having all they need to impeach Joke. 2 1
Recommended Posts