Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 hours ago, Doc said:

 

This is it in a nutshell.  Meanwhile fired prosecutor is never charged with the reason he was fired and the next prosecutor is told by idiot boy not to investigate his company, or anyone else for that matter.

The farms response was Hoax....

 

they choose to stay ignorant.

 

 

its telling the DEM politician most highlighted in all that theatre, was a young lady making a very emotional "But trump" reply.

 

LOL

 

its pathological 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Kemp said:

Not even on Fox.

They're liars .  Just like so many of the cons here.  they will try to win by cheating because they can't without it.  to Cavuto's credit, he aint buying it.  Comparing it to the hours of actual evidence in the trump impeachment trials is also lying.  and they know it.  they don't care.  Lies are their stock in trade....trump is their leader.

Edited by Joe Ferguson forever
  • Eyeroll 1
Posted

LMAO. down to just yelling "Liars"

 

Cognitive dissonance on display.

 

"Sometimes people hold a core belief that is very strong. When they are presented with evidence that works against that belief, the new evidence cannot be accepted. It would create a feeling that is extremely uncomfortable, called cognitive dissonance"

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted (edited)
23 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

LMAO. down to just yelling "Liars"

 

Cognitive dissonance on display.

 

"Sometimes people hold a core belief that is very strong. When they are presented with evidence that works against that belief, the new evidence cannot be accepted. It would create a feeling that is extremely uncomfortable, called cognitive dissonance"

listen to Raskin's speech.  They're using lies generated by the likes of Giuliani and Lev Parnos at the behest of fraudster don as "evidence" in the case.  They lie and then use the lies that have been definitively proven against their opponents.  Evil and sometimes effective with the rubes or crooked judges.  But America is better than those dirtbags.  If it isn't, it's time decent folks to leave....I'd like to think your're smart enough o know this and are complicit in the lying but I'm not confident.  Posters like Lenny or 29 definitely know this is a foundation of lies built on lies.  It's ok with them.  just part of the game....

 

Why wouldn't comer want to hear from 2 so intimately involved with Ukraine?

 

Once again, our saving grace is that it's smart people against morons.  Comer is thick as a brick.  But he's rotten to the core and that mitigates it some.  btw, I know they officially don't pay congressmen much but couldn't comer and his female "brain" in pink afford some clothes not from the sale rack at TJ Maxx?

Edited by Joe Ferguson forever
  • Eyeroll 1
Posted
30 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

The farms response was Hoax....

 

they choose to stay ignorant.

 

 

its telling the DEM politician most highlighted in all that theatre, was a young lady making a very emotional "But trump" reply.

 

LOL

 

its pathological 

 

 

 

Man, your lack of self-awareness and projection is off the charts.

 

All you have is fake news. It's really sad the BS that Trump and Guiliani spewed in 2019 still doesn't stick.

 

You and "Doc" can keep they psyop going - but it will never pan out - just like it didn't for Trump in 2020.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Eyeroll 1
Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, BillStime said:

but it will never pan out

idk.  There are lots of dummies out there.  The new R party loves the uneducated.  Education is for "elites".  Look at Comer....I half expected him to get up and start beating Raskin with a cane....like before the first civil war.

 

The caning of Charles Sumner, or the Brooks–Sumner Affair, occurred on May 22, 1856, in the United States Senate chamber, when Representative Preston Brooks, a pro-slavery Democrat from South Carolina, used a walking cane to attack Senator Charles Sumner, an abolitionist Republican from Massachusetts.

Edited by Joe Ferguson forever
  • Eyeroll 1
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

found someone that actually captured the inquiry. 


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/hunter-biden-investigation-top-takeaways-from-the-first-impeachment-inquiry-hearing/ar-AA1hqY5G

 

why not just subpoena hunter and jim? They can clear all of this up 😂 

That's up to Comer.  But why were they so adamantly against even a debate on Lev and Rudy? Gym Jordan had to be sent to fetch votes against the debate, cuz you know, they weren't at the "historic" hearing while all the dems (that actually look like the American public) were there. C'mon, you're smarter than this.  Don't play dumb.

Edited by Joe Ferguson forever
  • Eyeroll 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

That's up to Comer.  But why were they so adamantly against even a debate on Lev and Rudy? Gym Jordan had to be sent to fetch votes against the debate, cuz you know, they weren't at the "historic" hearing while all the dems (that actually look like the American public) were there. C'mon, you're smarter than this.  Don't play dumb.

Just read the article… it’s a pretty even assessment… they’ve got plenty evidence showing Biden’s family got tons of foreign money through payment structures that are hard for congressional simps to articulate BUT cant prove the money bought Joe. 
 

sounds right from everything I’ve heard 
 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

Just read the article… it’s a pretty even assessment… they’ve got plenty evidence showing Biden’s family got tons of foreign money through payment structures that are hard for congressional simps to articulate BUT cant prove the money bought Joe. 
 

sounds right from everything I’ve heard 
 

 

I'm old.  what's a simp and don't say "you".  If they had damning witnesses and evidence, wouldn't they trot them out the first day of the circus with what is left of the elephants?

 

from the article you cited (which flatly fails to make a strong case against President Biden, despite trying really, really hard):

The effort underscored the challenges Republicans may have in explaining their evidence to a public that has heard bits and pieces about the Biden family business deals for the last three years.

While House Republicans have uncovered a remarkable amount of new information about the dealings since arriving in the majority in January, some of it tying Joe Biden to the businesses for the first time, they run the risk of struggling to explain the case clearly to voters. The sometimes unwieldy impeachment inquiry hearing showed that the GOP may have work to do on that front.

 

Ya think Raskin might have done a better job if he'd been on the cheaters side?  How bout Kinzinger or Liz Cheney.  They've purged most of the R's with any intellect.  Whose fault is that?

Edited by Joe Ferguson forever
  • Eyeroll 1
Posted
26 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

found someone that actually captured the inquiry. 


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/hunter-biden-investigation-top-takeaways-from-the-first-impeachment-inquiry-hearing/ar-AA1hqY5G

 

why not just subpoena hunter and jim? They can clear all of this up 😂 

thats a pretty good unbiased summary.

 

If it was nothing, as the lefties are saying, they wouldn't be working so hard to deflect and attack the evidence.

 

 

 

 

 

 

https://www.dictionary.com/e/slang/simp/

 

The word simp is meant to troll young men for doing anything for a girl to get some action he supposedly deserves

 

akin to the slang stan.

 

Hip-hop lyrics from the late 1980s and 1990s were already using simp as an insult for a men perceived as too subservient to a woman. For instance, on Ice-T’s 1987 “Our Most Requested Record [Long Version],” DJ Evil E raps: “Taking out all simps and suckers …” Urban Dictionary entries in the early 2000–2010s also use simp in this way, with some of them maintaining that simp is a blend of sissy and pimp.

 

Then there’s simp as a short form of simpleton (a fool), which was first recorded all the way back in the early 1900s.

 

Fits like a glove

  • Agree 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

Fits like a glove

if you are a mysogynist.  Why do you hate and disrespect women?  Maybe you should sit in for comer.....can't do any worse.

8 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

deflect and attack the evidence.

what evidence?  Turkey saying in the opening minutes that he didn't think there was a case for impeachment?  C'mon

Posted (edited)

Meeting on Documents Protected Under Internal Revenue Code Section 6103 - House Committee on Ways and Means

 

https://waysandmeans.house.gov/event/meeting-on-documents-protected-under-internal-revenue-code-section-6103-2/

31 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

Then there’s simp as a short form of simpleton (a fool), which was first recorded all the way back in the early 1900s

fits like a glove

 

you can take your faux outrage in an attempt to insult, and find a mirror.

 

silly goose.

 

Edited by Chris farley
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

Well, if you can make this into a convincing argument, one would think Comer, Jordan, MTG and Boebert could as well...

6 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

Meeting on Documents Protected Under Internal Revenue Code Section 6103 - House Committee on Ways and Means

 

https://waysandmeans.house.gov/event/meeting-on-documents-protected-under-internal-revenue-code-section-6103-2/

fits like a glove

 

you can take your faux outrage in an attempt to insult, and find a mirror.

 

silly goose.

 

holding my heart...mortally wounded🤣  Do you MAGA's ever cease from projecting?

Edited by Joe Ferguson forever
Posted
19 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Ground and pound.  It works.  Keep rolling this stuff out over time.  
 

Hunter sounds like a total mess in that text, you gotta be wonder how a whiny meth head like that gets paid madd staxx in the Ukraine, or would have you didn’t know what happened. 

It’s not your tax money, it’s just your fair share of the collective.  You probably should do more, too. 


No, it’s whiny children throwing a tantrum and going “we’re gonna have our OWN impeachment you’ll see, you’ll see!!” 
 

How utterly pathetic. Glad that no one is paying any attention to this. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Eyeroll 1
Posted
27 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


No, it’s whiny children throwing a tantrum and going “we’re gonna have our OWN impeachment you’ll see, you’ll see!!” 
 

How utterly pathetic. Glad that no one is paying any attention to this. 

We can agree to disagree on whether or not impeachment has become a mainstream political strategy (it has), or that character assassination and innuendo isn't already a mainstream political strategy (it always has been), or that the the actions of family members are irrelevant in political operations (they aren't, and never were), but Biden brought this on himself. 

 

If you're correct, however, that no one is paying attention, then what's the harm in seeking transparency and truth? 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
52 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

like an old school mob family.

 

The ones screaming about law and order the last few years, are quick to ignore any evidence or narrative about biden.

 

He can do no wrong in their eyes.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

 

If you're correct, however, that no one is paying attention, then what's the harm in seeking transparency and truth? 

the first part of your post is sadly correct.  Turley called for "guardrails" in his constitutional interpretation of the impeachment process as aMAGA witness..  Do you agree.? If they were seeking truth and transparency, I'd agree with your second point.

Edited by Joe Ferguson forever
Posted
4 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

the first part of your post is sadly correct.  Turley called for "guardrails" in his constitutional interpretation of the impeachment process as aMAGA witness..  Do you agree.? If they were seeking truth and transparency, I'd agree with your second point.

Remember when old Pelosi said she could impeach him every day if needed.

 

then did the one while knowing the entire time the dossier was fake.  like Mueller.  

 

setting the bar. 

 

in the big picture. you all been screaming about high crimes at the white house, now you don't care.  

 

Epic.

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...