Wacka Posted September 14, 2023 Posted September 14, 2023 2 minutes ago, B-Man said: Truth reminder: Slime: Lies! Lies! All Lies!
B-Man Posted September 14, 2023 Posted September 14, 2023 8 minutes ago, BillStime said: 2 minutes ago, BillStime said: Posting about Trump in the Biden Impeachment thread, despite having personally started multiple Trump threads. . . . . . . . . . Dictionary Quote Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more des·per·a·tion /ˌdespəˈrāSH(ə)n/ noun a state of despair, typically one which results in rash or extreme behavior. Truth. . 1 2
BillStime Posted September 14, 2023 Posted September 14, 2023 25 minutes ago, B-Man said: Posting about Trump in the Biden Impeachment thread, despite having personally started multiple Trump threads. . . . . . . . . . Dictionary Truth. . Said post highlighted Trumps comments on Joe’s pending impeachment. You try so hard, Bonnie. #truth
ChiGoose Posted September 15, 2023 Posted September 15, 2023 2 hours ago, All_Pro_Bills said: The indictment was politics too. Quid Pro Quo. Remember that whopper? The indictment isn’t politics. It’s law enforcement. 1
B-Man Posted September 15, 2023 Posted September 15, 2023 4 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: The indictment isn’t politics. It’s law enforcement. 2 1 1
ChiGoose Posted September 15, 2023 Posted September 15, 2023 32 minutes ago, B-Man said: Yeah, Biden personally controls the Justice department, which is why they would never indict his son. 2
Tommy Callahan Posted September 15, 2023 Posted September 15, 2023 between the lying politicians, lying media and lying trolls. its an uphill battle. 1
B-Man Posted September 16, 2023 Posted September 16, 2023 No Evidence, My Rear By Susie Moore https://redstate.com/smoosieq/2023/09/15/moore-to-the-point-no-evidence-my-rear-n2163869 . 1
BillStime Posted September 16, 2023 Posted September 16, 2023 Bunch of clowns This, too, will blow up in their pathetic faces
John from Riverside Posted September 16, 2023 Posted September 16, 2023 On 9/14/2023 at 3:36 PM, B-Man said: Truth reminder: Literally, none of which link Joe Biden to any wrongdoing and you can’t say different If there was something actually there, they would’ve impeached a long time ago. This investigation has been going on for what well over a year more than that including the time that whenever Trump was in office. 37 minutes ago, BillStime said: Bunch of clowns This, too, will blow up in their pathetic faces I mean, as opposed to making T-shirts with an ex presidents, ugly face on them? On 9/14/2023 at 6:56 PM, ChiGoose said: Yeah, Biden personally controls the Justice department, which is why they would never indict his son. I know right Trump literally used his presidential power to get his friends out of jail. Joe Biden hates his son so much that he is allowing his DOJ to indict him 1
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted September 16, 2023 Posted September 16, 2023 On 9/13/2023 at 10:35 PM, John from Riverside said: There is a reason why they keep on using the term Biden family and not Joe Biden It’s OK I’m looking forward to this now that they have gone down this path they have to prove their case They don’t even have the votes for the impeachment inquiry and have been investigating this for months No, they don’t have to prove their case. That’s a plus if they can, but it won’t move Biden loyalists like you, Kemp, BillSy etc. It certainly won’t move the Senate to support impeachment. At a minimum, the modest goal of the impeachment inquiry is to paint Biden as corrupt, greedy and having sold out the American people in pursuit of personal gain. If you believe the polls, it seems to be working. 1
aristocrat Posted September 16, 2023 Posted September 16, 2023 8 hours ago, BillStime said: Bunch of clowns This, too, will blow up in their pathetic faces why did hunter claim to be paying his entire family’s bills? Why did he threaten a Chinese official telling him he was sitting there with his father? How do you explain that away? 1
Tommy Callahan Posted September 16, 2023 Posted September 16, 2023 Dems today struggling Sometimes people hold a core belief that is very strong. When they are presented with evidence that works against that belief, the new evidence cannot be accepted. It would create a feeling that is extremely uncomfortable, called cognitive dissonance. And because it is so important to protect the core belief, they will rationalize, ignore and even deny anything that doesn't fit in with the core belief. Fanon 1
BillStime Posted September 16, 2023 Posted September 16, 2023 2 hours ago, aristocrat said: why did hunter claim to be paying his entire family’s bills? Where was this information discovered? Let me guess - HUNTERS LAPTOP? 2 hours ago, aristocrat said: Why did he threaten a Chinese official telling him he was sitting there with his father? How do you explain that away? A lot of speculation.
Doc Posted September 16, 2023 Posted September 16, 2023 3 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: No, they don’t have to prove their case. That’s a plus if they can, but it won’t move Biden loyalists like you, Kemp, BillSy etc. It certainly won’t move the Senate to support impeachment. At a minimum, the modest goal of the impeachment inquiry is to paint Biden as corrupt, greedy and having sold out the American people in pursuit of personal gain. If you believe the polls, it seems to be working. Again there's more there than there was for the phone call impeachment, where nothing was proven. Again this isn't a trial, it's a political process. And It's definitely working. The question is: will they (need to) continue if the Dems pull the plug on Joke? 2
aristocrat Posted September 16, 2023 Posted September 16, 2023 2 hours ago, BillStime said: Where was this information discovered? Let me guess - HUNTERS LAPTOP? A lot of speculation. The one he verified was his own in the lawsuit? 2
Recommended Posts