Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said:

 

Okay.  We will disagree.

 

I will be in favor of the opinion on people who know how to look at film.  

 

That's fine, I'll favor the facts in the breakdown between rushing and passing D.  :)  

 

We all make our choices.  I do have a hunch however that your opinion will be changing significantly as the season goes along.  

 

BTW, who are those people and where's their work, besides "they said so"?   From what I've seen on Youtube, none contradict what I've laid out.  

 

 

Edited by PBF81
Posted

So professionals that say Bernard played well have good qualified opinions. 
 

But the professionals that said Edmunds was a top MLB are clueless. 
 

Got it. 

Posted
Just now, PBF81 said:

 

That's fine, I'll favor the facts in the breakdown between rushing and passing D.  :)  

 

We all make our choices.  I do have a hunch however that your opinion will be changing significantly as the season goes along.  

 

 

 

You don't know how to evaluate and passing it off as facts....got it.

Just out of curiosity, where did you learn to break down film in the trenches?

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Royale with Cheese said:

 

You don't know how to evaluate and passing it off as facts....got it.

Just out of curiosity, where did you learn to break down film in the trenches?

 

 

How do you know what my background is?  

 

Otherwise, as I added in edit, what are these expert sources that you've cited, what, Youtubers?  LOL  

 

Again, from what I've seen absolutely none contradict what I've laid out.   In fact, they focus on his role in pass defense/coverage.  Which again, I have no argument with.  

 

So show me all of these expert sources, I'll see what their background is, and we can go from there.  

 

See, the difference between you and I in this exchange, is that I've provided info from several sources.  All you've provided is that you've watched so-called "experts" without having pointed out to me their videos, articles featuring details, etc.  Maybe you have to someone else, but not to me you haven't.  

 

So feel free to post them.  Maybe I'll agree with you after I view them.  

 

 

Posted
On 9/12/2023 at 12:20 AM, Royale with Cheese said:


He lead our team in tackles with 11.

 MLB leading a football team in tackles...in other late breaking news, water is wet. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
On 9/12/2023 at 12:16 AM, Thrivefourfive said:

Jesus, he’s a nice junior college middle killer. But having offensive lineman continuing to find him 5 yards down field and clamp him up was disgusting to watch. TB is really REALY out of his element. I’m not even sure if he’s explosive enough to be a special teamer (he can surely play punt team). 
 

Another negative takeaway from this ass game. 

 

He's good in pass-coverage.  He's simply not well suited to being a LB on running plays.  

 

The fact that Beane picked him as a MLB is on Beane, it really shouldn't be on Bernard.  Poor dude's out of position in the NFL.  

 

Bernard was a 3rd-5th round prospect on every board of the 10+ that I saw.  

 

Here's his NFL.com Draft Profile, which IMO is pretty much what we saw on Monday and in preseason.  

 

Draft Projection:  5th Round

Project Grade:  5.94 - Average Backup or Special Teamer 

 

Overview

 

Undersized sub-package nickel linebacker with special-teams value on the next level. Bernard possesses elite intangibles and teams will be drawn to him because of it. He's resilient, productive and showed a willingness to play through pain. However, Bernard lacks the desired frame and play strength and will face scrutiny surrounding his injury history. He needs space to operate and has the speed for man-cover duties as a pro. If the medicals check out, he should be a Day 3 pick with sub-package value.

 

Strengths

 

- Scouts rave about his leadership and character.

- Never-quit attitude despite adversity.

- Film junkie who rang up 100-plus tackles in 2019 and 2021.

- Rapid read and response against play-action.

- On a continuous quest to go get the football.

- Loose and fluid in pursuit and change of direction.

- Bends and flattens off the corner as a blitzer.

- Speed to cover man targets underneath.

 

Weaknesses

 

- Slender frame might be maxed out.

- Gets caught up too easily in the clutter.

- Engulfed by size if he's not proactive.

- Struggles to fit and hold a gap.

- Knocked off-balance by redirect blocks.

- Loses pursuit leverage, allowing back to cross his face.

- Angles to runner leave little margin for error as tackler.

- Average coverage recognition.

 

 

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, PBF81 said:

 

How do you know what my background is?  

 

Otherwise, as I added in edit, what are these expert sources that you've cited, what, Youtubers?  LOL  

 

Again, from what I've seen absolutely none contradict what I've laid out.   In fact, they focus on his role in pass defense/coverage.  Which again, I have no argument with.  

 

So show me all of these expert sources, I'll see what their background is, and we can go from there.  

 

See, the difference between you and I in this exchange, is that I've provided info from several sources.  All you've provided is that you've watched so-called "experts" without having pointed out to me their videos, articles featuring details, etc.  Maybe you have to someone else, but not to me you haven't.  

 

So feel free to post them.  Maybe I'll agree with you after I view them.  

 

 

 

Why didn't you answer the question?  Where did you learn to break down film in the trenches?

 

I didn't say experts.  You don't need to be an expert to understand at the basic X's and O's level.  If you played offensive line at HS level, you understand how to break down film as an offensive lineman.  Some people do it as a hobby because they study it.  This isn't some sort of rare ability.  I played WR so I've never had to break down film inside the trenches. 

 

So since I don't know, I don't pretend I know.  So I rely on guys I trust know what they're looking at.  Videos are posted in this thread and posters who understand the game are commenting on it.

That's where you and I differ.  You hold onto a thought and that's it.  You don't learn anything being so stubborn.

 

So yes


 

  • Eyeroll 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, Fallser said:

 MLB leading a football team in tackles...in other late breaking news, water is wet. 

 

Thank you!  There's someone that knows his football.  LBs and Ss consistently lead in tackle rankings, for what should be obvious reasons.  

 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, Royale with Cheese said:

I didn't say experts.  You don't need to be an expert to understand at the basic X's and O's level.  If you played offensive line at HS level, you understand how to break down film as an offensive lineman.  Some people do it as a hobby because they study it.  This isn't some sort of rare ability.  I played WR so I've never had to break down film inside the trenches. 

 

So since I don't know, I don't pretend I know.  So I rely on guys I trust know what they're looking at.  Videos are posted in this thread and posters who understand the game are commenting on it.

That's where you and I differ.  You hold onto a thought and that's it.  You don't learn anything being so stubborn.

 

So yes


 

 

Hedging I see.  As expected. 

 

I asked you for what you looked at and read to come to that conclusion.  I gave you some of my reference points. 

 

I'm doing my best to see things the way that you see them, but I cannot do that without seeing what you looked at.  It seems that either you don't want to provide that, or that you really don't have much to back it up and simply want to argue with me.  Either way, I've done my best to see things you way.  Without your assistance in providing what you've seen and read, I cannot help anymore. 

 

We're finished here.  

 

Again however, I do firmly believe that you will be altering your opinion as the season goes on.  I'm not one that gives a crap about "being right," otherwise I'd bookmark these posts.  But remember your take now and then consider why you believed whatever you believed when the time comes.  If it doesn't and TB develops into a world-class run defender, then please, by all means, feel perfectly free to throw it back in my face.  I will happily accept it at that time should that come to pass.  About all I can do now.  :) 

 

 

Posted (edited)
On 9/12/2023 at 12:16 AM, Thrivefourfive said:

Jesus, he’s a nice junior college middle killer. But having offensive lineman continuing to find him 5 yards down field and clamp him up was disgusting to watch. TB is really REALY out of his element. I’m not even sure if he’s explosive enough to be a special teamer (he can surely play punt team). 
 

Another negative takeaway from this ass game. 

100% agree. 

 

It's a joke that veteran defensive Coach like McDermott is really trying to sell him as a viable starting NFL MLB. 

 

Despite what Joe Marino said about him, watch the large running plays or play calls that ask Bernard to attack the LOS as a blitzer. He is engulfed. Conklin took him one on one and rode him out of plays completely. 

 

Maybe the name of the game now is passing and he is a better coverage linebacker, but his athleticism is overstated. 

 

Edited by Straight Hucklebuck
Posted
1 hour ago, ngbills said:

So professionals that say Bernard played well have good qualified opinions. 
 

But the professionals that said Edmunds was a top MLB are clueless. 
 

Got it. 

My eyes tell me that the next RB angle route taken the house will be the first for Bernard. We cannot say the same for Edmundo 

Posted
On 9/12/2023 at 7:16 AM, Thrivefourfive said:

Jesus, he’s a nice junior college middle killer. But having offensive lineman continuing to find him 5 yards down field and clamp him up was disgusting to watch. TB is really REALY out of his element. I’m not even sure if he’s explosive enough to be a special teamer (he can surely play punt team). 
 

Another negative takeaway from this ass game. 

U sure your not talking about Keith Ellison? 😂 

Posted
7 minutes ago, FireChans said:

My eyes tell me that the next RB angle route taken the house will be the first for Bernard. We cannot say the same for Edmundo 

Edmunds is a free agent - gets 4/$72M

Care to wager what Bernard would get? More like 4/$7.2M.

Posted
On 9/12/2023 at 12:19 AM, NewEra said:

He played better than I thought he would.  
 

 

Idk how people can be upset with allowing 16 points to someone. Even if it was Zack Wilson, they still have some great skill position players and 16 points is very respectable in the modern NFL. If the offense can’t generate more than that to win the game then it is on them. Bernard wasn’t a liability on the field and that’s all you can ask for. 

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...