Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
27 minutes ago, Tommy Callahan said:

yup. it's the new rules.  cops can use lethal force on rioters/trespassers.

 

 

 

 

 


Why does this guy get to rely on self defense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

image.jpeg


But not this guy?

 

image.thumb.jpeg.a5baee1bbe42d6f518e6b28932e007d4.jpeg

 

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, BillStime said:


Why does this guy get to rely on self defense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

image.jpeg


But not this guy?

 

image.thumb.jpeg.a5baee1bbe42d6f518e6b28932e007d4.jpeg

 

 

 


One is a classy, hard working American using his God-given right to shoot people who look at him wrong, the other is a disgusting thug from the ghetto /s

  • Eyeroll 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, The Frankish Reich said:

It's the old, old rule. An officer guarding a secured governmental facility may use violent force when an intruder who has bypassed security measures tries to break down a door/window to approach a government official.

Really. You guys need a reality check. Byrd, the officer, said he didn't know if she was armed or not. Tell me: how was he supposed to know? It's not like she went to the front security desk and passed through a metal detector.

And to boot, a lot of you guys are the gun nuts who defend a homeowner shooting a guy for knocking on a door or prowling around a home.

Do stupid things, win stupid prizes.

Thats not a rule in any shape or form or that summer of rage would have been really interesting.

 

Lafyette square, Portland federal building to name a few Imagine if cops opened up every time a police station was attacked or occupied.  

 

Still following your logic. a cop can shoot a person if they are not sure if they are armed?  Not reality.

 

The last part is a silly strawman, even for you

 

The majority shooting are in dem strongholds with future dems.

 

 

 

 

 

 

1 hour ago, BillStime said:


Why does this guy get to rely on self defense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

image.jpeg


But not this guy?

 

image.thumb.jpeg.a5baee1bbe42d6f518e6b28932e007d4.jpeg

 

 

 

Armed poeple were pointing guns at him.

 

DERP.

Posted
On 10/5/2023 at 7:21 AM, BillStime said:


Why does this guy get to rely on self defense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

image.jpeg


But not this guy?

 

image.thumb.jpeg.a5baee1bbe42d6f518e6b28932e007d4.jpeg

 

 

 

I didn’t agree with the courts decision on this, but they did make a ruling so I have to accept it
 

 

Posted
On 10/9/2023 at 5:21 AM, BillStime said:

 

Let’s be real here morality went out the window whenever the Republicans were talking about bringing in Trump to be even a temporary speaker of the house
 

The same people were denouncing Trump left and right whenever that all went down and then whenever they had time to think about their career paths, they change their stance. Have you ever seen a bunch of people who change their opinions so quickly as you have Republican politicians

 

Nancy Mace I hate Matt Gaetz

 

Nancy Mace I will help Matt Gaetz get the speaker out

 

There is a list of these people that I’ve done this

 

There is no such thing as morality with the republican party

1 hour ago, BillStime said:

 

People need to put him on the spot about the fact that none of that $6 billion even been used and when it is it will be used for food and medicine with oversight

Posted
8 hours ago, John from Riverside said:

Let’s be real here morality went out the window whenever the Republicans were talking about bringing in Trump to be even a temporary speaker of the house
 

The same people were denouncing Trump left and right whenever that all went down and then whenever they had time to think about their career paths, they change their stance. Have you ever seen a bunch of people who change their opinions so quickly as you have Republican politicians

 

Nancy Mace I hate Matt Gaetz

 

Nancy Mace I will help Matt Gaetz get the speaker out

 

There is a list of these people that I’ve done this

 

There is no such thing as morality with the republican party

People need to put him on the spot about the fact that none of that $6 billion even been used and when it is it will be used for food and medicine with oversight

You work at a college and post crap like this? You’re f’n nuts! You should not be allowed near any young person. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
On 10/9/2023 at 11:41 PM, John from Riverside said:

I didn’t agree with the courts decision on this, but they did make a ruling so I have to accept it
 

 

What not to agree on? It was self defense and nothing more.

  • Agree 2
Posted
On 9/10/2023 at 10:07 PM, BillStime said:

 

 

Right because I've never seen an African American Christian in my life.   Meanwhile in China underground churches are happening.

 

If all else fails blame whitey or call someone a racist.   

Posted
14 minutes ago, thenorthremembers said:

Right because I've never seen an African American Christian in my life.   Meanwhile in China underground churches are happening.

 

If all else fails blame whitey or call someone a racist.   


Oh - this hit a nerve, eh? 
 

Very telling.

  • Eyeroll 2
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, BillStime said:


Oh - this hit a nerve, eh? 
 

Very telling.

Not at all.  Its just blatant horse crap.   Christianity does not equate to only white Americans.  Any proliferation of the opposite by a white person is in itself racist as it discredits the faith of millions of people of color.

 

There are studies out there that say a larger portion of the African American and Latino populations are Christian than the percentage of white Christians.

 

I am white and I am Christian, but I am also fiercely against devisive tactics like the stuff you spew on these boards.    Its just bias nonsense.

Edited by thenorthremembers
  • Agree 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 2
×
×
  • Create New...