Jump to content

Bills lose Anderson, Austin and Broeker to claims.


BuffaloBillyG

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, SCBills said:

At this point, just use 7th Round picks as minor trade pieces or to draft a punter.

 

idk about that, sometime you hit on a decent player with potential like Benford

 

edit he was a 6th rd

Edited by Slippery Rubber Mats
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

Bills lead the league in players claimed. Interesting.

 

Still a bit misleading because Texans are widely considered to be among the worst teams in the league again this year record wise and up there with Cardinals jockeying for #1 overall pick in next year draft. So taking a flying on 2 of our 7th round guys is great on the surface but doesn't mean we are best roster in NFL.

  • Eyeroll 2
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Bills traded down twice in the 2023 draft, they ended up with two picks in the 7th round (Broeker and Austin) but they also picked up two 6th round picks in 2024. So they didn't really lose much here.

 

 

Nick Broeker trade (pick 230):

 

Houston traded their 230 overall pick in Round 7 along with a 2024 sixth-rounder to the Bills to take Xavier Hutchinson at 205.

 

Alex Austin trade (pick 252):

 

Buffalo traded this sixth-round selection (215th) to Los Angeles in exchange for a seventh-round selection (252nd) and a 2024 sixth-round selection.

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, TheyCallMeAndy said:

Weird, I’ve been hearing how much Beane neglects the roster.

 

Q-Berry was also signed. 

Because we have one of the best rosters in the league. This is proof.

11 minutes ago, FilthyBeast said:

 

Still a bit misleading because Texans are widely considered to be among the worst teams in the league again this year record wise and up there with Cardinals jockeying for #1 overall pick in next year draft. So taking a flying on 2 of our 7th round guys is great on the surface but doesn't mean we are best roster in NFL.

What? If this logic were sound why didn’t they pick from others teams cuts? That’s because it’s obvious the Bills have a very strong roster.

4 minutes ago, MAJBobby said:

Austin is likely the only one on that list they would have liked to get through to the PS

Heard they really wanted Broeker.

  • Agree 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, FilthyBeast said:

 

Still a bit misleading because Texans are widely considered to be among the worst teams in the league again this year record wise and up there with Cardinals jockeying for #1 overall pick in next year draft. So taking a flying on 2 of our 7th round guys is great on the surface but doesn't mean we are best roster in NFL.

LOL, why weren't all the "loaded" Dolphins cuts claimed???  😂 

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...