Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, MAJBobby said:

I am really interested in seeing what they do for the PS Arm.  Will they go young or Older vet

If they go younger with possible development in mind....this may be a possible target IMO.

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, MAJBobby said:

I am really interested in seeing what they do for the PS Arm.  Will they go young or Older vet

I think they should go young.  Free trial period, IMO.  Mainly bc Barkley is a fall back option in a few weeks (assuming he's released with inj settlement/ goes unsigned for the necessary timing)

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 hour ago, GunnerBill said:

If Isabella and Ankou are back and we can have up to six guys with more than 4 years (and therefore not subject to waivers) other vets one presumes in contention:

 

QB: Barkley

OG: Boettger

MLB: Klein

S: Marlowe


This would be perfect

Posted
1 hour ago, NickelCity said:

Tell me about Gouraige already. The kid has something.

I have always like him, another Florida prospect now on our team.  He had a very unusual injury right about the combine so he missed it, had he gone he would have probably been about a 6-7th rounder as it was he went undrafted.  Big guy, in his senior year allowed just one sack in 343 pass attempts.  Has limited athleticism but can move in and play guard.  If Shorter made the team we could have three of their offensive starters from last year. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
1 hour ago, CNYfan said:

I am hoping for Austin and Broeker.  Austin probably has a roster spot, or an easier path to playing time elsewhere 

 

 

Does anyone have a list or summary of signings?

 

No joke, other teams have put out their entire PS already!

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

If Isabella and Ankou are back and we can have up to six guys with more than 4 years (and therefore not subject to waivers) other vets one presumes in contention:

 

QB: Barkley

OG: Boettger

MLB: Klein

S: Marlowe

 

I'm not entirely ginned up on the PS rules (actually I try but they give me a headache).

 

However, the Bills placed Barkley on season-ending IR yesterday.

They can release him with an injury settlement, but then they are barred from signing him for 6 weeks AFTER the # of weeks in the injury settlement.  PRETTY SURE that includes a signing to the PS
 

 

Edited by Beck Water
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, freddyjj said:

Well I guess the consolation prize for all the fans trying to wish and hope Isabella onto the roster is that he made PS and can be activated for the first 4 games if Shorter/Shakir go to short term IR.  

 

For the life of me I cannot make sense of the supposed ST prowess he exhibits.  Nothing at all in preseason, save for a fumble that popped into a team mates hands, and certainly nothing as a pro or even at UMass.  

 

Not a returner, not a gunner or up back either.  Probably why he didn't make the 53.  

 

 

 

True, but he's also shown pretty much nothing as a receiver, both with the Cardinals and in this preseason.
 

I don't mind him being on the practice squad - he's fast even by NFL standards, and fast guys have some value even when they can't really play. (See also Foster, Robert.)  But I never bought the training camp hype for a second.  I think part of the problem was that once he got a positive review in a couple of camp reports, fans (who've heard of him, and find they're rooting for him even if they can't put their finger on why) started tweeting at reporters asking about Isabella.  From there, reporters started asking about Isabella in press conferences with McDermott & Allen.  The answers were pretty standard generically positive stuff, but gave the reports some positive-sounding quotes to include in their articles, tweets, etc.  Then the fans read the articles and become convinced that 1.) Isabella was charging up the depth chart, and 2.) Isabella would immediately be signed by another team if we cut him.

 

 

On the PS front itself, I'm happy about the Kirksey signing.  He takes one of our 6 veteran spots, but won't be there for long. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Jerry Jabber said:

Thought Ateman and Johnson looked good in the preseason. I know we can’t keep everyone, but I’d rather have one of those guys over Shakir who struggled in training camp.

Would've liked to have signed him.

 

Only because I want to say "THROW HIM THE DAMN BALL!"

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, AuntieEm said:

Guess there dome wiggle room when they agree to injury settlement if it's say4 weeks recovery he could resign after additional 4 weeks or so someone says that's how it works.

 

I believe it's 6 weeks, and just to be clear the Bills haven't indicated an injury settlement with Barkley.

 

So the earliest Bills could resign Barkley would be injury settlement weeks + 6 weeks, 10 weeks in your example.

Edited by Beck Water
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...