Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Im not sure what's going on with the pinned threads and this probably one deserves it's own thread anyways.

 

We've lost/cut Shell, Quessenberry and Doyle this off-season. Basically all of our depth.

 

Something has to be in the works at OT, no?

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Shocked 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Process said:

Im not sure what's going on with the pinned threads

 

We're just trying to have at least one thread where all the cuts are listed and people can find them quickly without having to wade through 50 pages of discussion.

Unfortunately that thread is being constantly derailed by people with the reading comprehension of a 3rd grader. 🤷‍♂️

 

  • Like (+1) 6
  • Eyeroll 1
  • Haha (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 3
Posted
Just now, Warriorspikes51 said:

 

The sad thing is, that could actually happen....and it would be pathetic 

 

No it's not.  When he was with us, he didn't play much other than being the 6th OL on jumbo packages.

He wasn't the first tackle off the bench after Brown got hurt.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Process said:

Im not sure what's going on with the pinned threads and this probably one deserves it's own thread anyways.

 

We've lost/cut Shell, Quessenberry and Doyle this off-season. Basically all of our depth.

 

Something has to be in the works at OT, no?

 

 

why?

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, nucci said:

why?

 

I'd say it's because he's played a fair number of snaps for the Bills and it's a bit of a surprise

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said:


that would be a pleasant surprise 

It would be after week 1 if it happens.

 

Sounds like they like anderson and van dermark

Posted
29 minutes ago, Process said:

Im not sure what's going on with the pinned threads and this probably one deserves it's own thread anyways.

 

We've lost/cut Shell, Quessenberry and Doyle this off-season. Basically all of our depth.

 

Something has to be in the works at OT, no?

 

 

Perhaps  Beane would re sign him later?

Posted

It's important to remember as these cuts are announced that with practice squad rules being changed in recent years and the number of practice squad players being increased to 16, NFL teams essentially have 69 (...nice) man rosters these days, not 53.

It's all about who you think you can get through to the practice squad and who you can't.

I'd bet money that the Bills didn't feel they could get Van Demark through waivers (and he's been the better player this offseason, anyway), but they COULD get Quessenberry through. I'd bet on him winding up on the practice squad.

With that said, I do still expect an outside waiver add at OT for the 53 man roster. But it's important to remember all the practice squad, PUP, and IR shenanigans that teams pull during cutdown day, and I think that may apply to Quessenberry.

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...