EmotionallyUnstable Posted August 29, 2023 Posted August 29, 2023 For the amount of money they’re paying him, I’d activate him abd at least make him carry the water jugs or something 1 Quote
Bob Chandler's Hands Posted August 29, 2023 Posted August 29, 2023 Only 9 question marks? That's weak. 14 is the minimum, dude. 2 Quote
AuntieEm Posted August 29, 2023 Posted August 29, 2023 42 minutes ago, EmotionallyUnstable said: For the amount of money they’re paying him, I’d activate him abd at least make him carry the water jugs or something He can carry the water jugs as part of his rehab so he can stay on PUP until he's not feeling like betty white needing a snickers bar. 1 Quote
YattaOkasan Posted August 29, 2023 Posted August 29, 2023 5 hours ago, Gugny said: White wasn’t rushed. He took forever to get back on the field and was horrible when he returned. You need to define terrible. Cause he allowed a passer rating of 75 in 2022. He wasn’t as good as he was in all pro year or 2021 but he was comparable to his rookie season and 2020. Better throw some respect on that name. 2 Quote
AuntieEm Posted August 29, 2023 Posted August 29, 2023 (edited) 1 hour ago, YattaOkasan said: You need to define terrible. Cause he allowed a passer rating of 75 in 2022. He wasn’t as good as he was in all pro year or 2021 but he was comparable to his rookie season and 2020. Better throw some respect on that name. I also believe the OP may have meant by activating tre off pup so early maybe pushed tre to get back on field a tad early whereas if he remained rehabbing a few more weeks he might have had more trust in the repaired acl. It's common for it to take an additional year to get back from acl injuries. Once the 4 week countdown started he maybe pushed too hard and that would easily effect his confidence in acl stability. Edit this was meant as a reply to gugny as I agree with you YattaOkasan. Edited August 29, 2023 by AuntieEm 1 Quote
RobbRiddick Posted August 29, 2023 Posted August 29, 2023 Sal seems to think he'll be on the 53, for what it's worth Quote
eball Posted August 29, 2023 Posted August 29, 2023 I’ve been thinking about the pros and cons of putting Von on the 53 to begin the season. The Bills’ defense is on the field for what, 65-70 snaps per game? If Von is eased into the lineup and only plays 15-20 snaps for the first few games (roughly 20-25%) isn’t that still better than not having him? Obviously this is all contingent on him being “ready to go.” We know the goal is to have him healthy for the stretch run. Quote
ALF Posted August 29, 2023 Posted August 29, 2023 Lets hope Leonard Floyd can fill in for Von 1 Quote
Beck Water Posted August 29, 2023 Posted August 29, 2023 12 hours ago, k2mountain said: Curious. Please give an example of aggressive return from injury for me to Google. First off, note my specific phrasing: "the Bills have, in the past, been aggressive/optimistic about their anticipated timeline for various players' return. They have kept guys off IR who wound up missing 4-5 games repeatedly." (I'm actually mistaken - it's more often missing 3 games and playing in the 4th, but ineffective - and in 2020, IR was 3 games) That's not quite the same as "aggressive return from injury" and I'm not sure what Google will get you on that. The most public and google-able examples of aggressive return from injury: 2022. Gabe Davis, reported ankle sprain prior to week 2. Missed Week 2 game; questionable for week 3 and 4 but played. After the season, Davis acknowledged and Beane stated that the "nagging injury" had bothered him all season. Maybe if he sat for a couple weeks and healed, he would have been better thru the season? 2020. Cole Beasley. Missed one game with a "knee" injury. Played 3 playoff games. After the season, it was reported he was playing on a broken leg. Maybe the decision to do that had some impact on Beasley's long term athleticism? He contributed heavily in 2 of 3 playoff games 2021. Injured week 8. Listed as "Questionable" for week 9 but played. It was later reported (by his agent) he was playing through cracked ribs. It was notable that his targets and yardage plummeted week 9-12 A few examples of the not-IRing injured player but having them miss an equivalent-to-IR number of games: 2020 Matt Milano. Injured Week 4. No IR. Missed 2 games Week 5 and Week 6. Played Week 7 and Week 8 but minimal snaps, wearing brace, and plainly ineffective - couldn't even lift his arm to tackle. Went on IR Week 9 for 3 weeks (in 2020, IR was 3 weeks). If that's not aggressive with an injury, don't know what is. 2020 Dawson Knox. Injured Week 5. Stayed in the game and threw TD pass with broken hand, had surgery. Missed 3 weeks, (was on Covid list but probably wouldn't have played, for 2 of those 3). Played in his 4th week, but only about 1/3 of his usual snaps and clearly couldn't block. There are more, but I'm out of time to dig. Good luck with your Google. Bottom line, I think it's a myth that the Bills are particularly conservative with injuries. It depends upon the injury, and of course the player. Some players want to play and will lobby for that pretty ferociously. I'm not trying to say the Bills are careless with players health either, but at the end of the day it's football and they're a football team. 2 Quote
BuffaloBillyG Posted September 7, 2023 Posted September 7, 2023 10 minutes ago, Scott7975 said: I like it. What that says to me is the knee itself is ready and he just needed time to get comfortable cutting on it and get into gameday shape. Gives him a bit extra to be ready. I have a feeling his first game back he's going to play like he was shot out of a cannon. 1 1 1 Quote
Scott7975 Posted September 7, 2023 Posted September 7, 2023 1 minute ago, BuffaloBillyG said: I like it. What that says to me is the knee itself is ready and he just needed time to get comfortable cutting on it and get into gameday shape. Gives him a bit extra to be ready. I have a feeling his first game back he's going to play like he was shot out of a cannon. Yeah, I don't want to see him rushed and then have another blow out. I don't think he will play week 5 because he can't practice at all on PuP and thats a short week. Probably take some time to get in football shape. 2 Quote
njbuff Posted September 7, 2023 Posted September 7, 2023 My guess is that the staff wants him ready by the Cincinnati game as they will have a 10 day layoff after the Tampa Bay game before the Bengals game. 1 Quote
The Wiz Posted September 7, 2023 Posted September 7, 2023 (edited) It might have just been me, but he sounded kinda down that they put him on PUP. Like he said, he's a football player and wants to play but it sounded like it caught him by surprise honestly (especially after his doctor cleared him). The other part that hurts is that it means he cant fully practice with the team until after week 4 the earliest. So is working out and doing those PUP drills for the next 4 weeks (the same he's been doing already) going to get the rest of his body and mind in shape and ready for week 5? 6? 7? 10? I know they play it safe with injuries but not having him on the field but practicing is a lot better than not having him on the field and riding a bike. Edited September 7, 2023 by The Wiz Quote
RJ (not THAT RJ) Posted September 7, 2023 Posted September 7, 2023 I think we can all agree that we will forego Von sacks in September for some sacks in January and February. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.