boyst Posted September 25, 2023 Posted September 25, 2023 35 minutes ago, Bferra13 said: I'll go so far as to say Edmunds + Frazier cost us a Superbowl appearance. At minimum. Edmunds should have seen that lineup in KC. Fraziers best games were behind him. I don't know if they cost us the SB but the window closed in KC. 1 minute ago, Captain Hindsight said: They spent like they were just a few pieces away from true contenders. It was a stunning lack of self evaluation Fields was terrible last year, They had a chance to replace him and opted to run it back with him and DJ Moore? It was almost as bad a decision doubling down on EJ with Watkins. It is amazing how they valued him at LB. Chicago has a fascination with LB. Always has and it's cost them. To drop Roquan Smith and likely have the plan to bring Edmunds in was insane! 2 Quote
DeltaDigital Posted September 25, 2023 Posted September 25, 2023 1 hour ago, delirious said: This is so delightful to keep reading. After all the homers constantly and vociferously telling us he's good. *Chef's kiss*, I hope this thread continues, not because of Edmunds, but so the Edmunds Truthers can sit there and be reminded about their homerism lol Yessss king. Yes. We all need to learn around here to remove the rose colored glasses. It wasn’t even hard with edmunds. Yet “you don’t know football” and worse… numbers don’t lie fellas. Politicians do. 1 Quote
balln Posted September 25, 2023 Posted September 25, 2023 This thread must continue. For every single edmunds apologist to soak it in 3 1 1 Quote
Mr. WEO Posted September 25, 2023 Posted September 25, 2023 Still a bum, only in Chicago this time 1 1 Quote
LABILLBACKER Posted September 25, 2023 Posted September 25, 2023 51 minutes ago, Steptide said: When we drafted Allen and Edmunds in round 1, I remember thinking the next day how we made a terrible pick with Allen and a great pick with Edmunds 😅. Edmunds has never lived up to where he was drafted And as things in life turn out it was just the opposite. 1 Quote
Brand J Posted September 25, 2023 Posted September 25, 2023 1 hour ago, Coach Tuesday said: Today was really a new low for him. He was a spectator for most of the game and then went to the locker room. I’m talking loafing around the field. Something is wrong with the dude. Edmunds has never played with an all out hustle and fierceness. I remember against the Chiefs in, I believe the first playoff game, he was jogging as Tyreek caught a pass and almost went for a TD before our DT ran him down (name escapes me). I believe that was the play, someone correct me if I’m wrong. I pointed out how Edmunds looked like he was going half speed on the replay before his weak tackle attempt and got eye roll emojis. It was there my criticism of him really picked up. 1 1 Quote
FireChans Posted September 25, 2023 Author Posted September 25, 2023 1 hour ago, John from Riverside said: Maybe just maybe the bills know what they’re doing You don't get to play that card win lose or draw. 1 Quote
babulator Posted September 25, 2023 Posted September 25, 2023 Regardless if you were a Tremaine fan or not, It's pretty shocking how poorly he's played in Chicago. I can't help but wonder how things may have been with someone else over the last couple of years. Quote
AuntieEm Posted September 25, 2023 Posted September 25, 2023 1 hour ago, thenorthremembers said: Can't feel good to go from winning to the Bears. Well he wanted his big payday. He isn't worth the contract he got. If he wants t8o win maybe he should start making plays rather than being a passenger. 1 1 Quote
AlfaBill Posted September 25, 2023 Posted September 25, 2023 1 hour ago, thenorthremembers said: Can't feel good to go from winning to the Bears. Boo hoo 1 hour ago, boyst said: Edmunds should have seen that lineup in KC. Fraziers best games were behind him. I don't know if they cost us the SB but the window closed in KC. It is amazing how they valued him at LB. Chicago has a fascination with LB. Always has and it's cost them. To drop Roquan Smith and likely have the plan to bring Edmunds in was insane! The bears are stuck in the past with great defence. They blow 1 Quote
Bills!Win! Posted September 25, 2023 Posted September 25, 2023 This is going to be a fun topic through week 18 Quote
syhuang Posted September 25, 2023 Posted September 25, 2023 (edited) Edited September 25, 2023 by syhuang 1 4 Quote
mykidsdad Posted September 25, 2023 Posted September 25, 2023 TB is a better player at 5% the cost. Bills win! Quote
Brand J Posted September 25, 2023 Posted September 25, 2023 1 minute ago, syhuang said: The TD he allowed to Kelce in the back of the endzone was inexcusable I thought. You’re 6’5” with a crazy wingspan, NO WAY should that ball have made it to Kelce. Nevermind the fact his awareness was lacking and he didn’t know Kelce was in his zone, if he simply jumped more than 6” off the ground he could’ve, would’ve, and should’ve knocked down that pass. 1 2 Quote
GunnerBill Posted September 25, 2023 Posted September 25, 2023 1 hour ago, QCity said: Denver Broncos say: hold our beer! 4 1 Quote
SoMAn Posted September 25, 2023 Posted September 25, 2023 (edited) 8 hours ago, jamiezzz said: Can we delete this thread? jeez. Move on already. This is basically an 'I told you so' thread to all the Edmunds apologists for the past 5 years of excusing his underachieving play. I don't think anyone has a personal axe to grind with Tremaine. A good teammate and great guy by all accounts. I don't believe the criticism has been directed specifically at him, but rather at those who continued to believe the hype from One Bills Drive and the media, that the former first round draft choice was a force on the defense. He wasn't! The stellar play by his young replacement should help convince them. Milano and Bernard may turn out to be a great LB duo. Regardless of the never ending 'athleticism and wingspan' hype, Edmunds was a liability more often than not. Defenders knew they could run right over him and get him out of position on passing plays. For all his natural ability, he lacks the tenacity and instincts to be a top tier defender in the NFL. Thank goodness the Bills were wise enough to spend their money on Oliver and Milano, rather than wasting it on Edmunds. Best wishes to Tremaine. Good for him that the inept Bears management bought into the media B.S. It's a shame they're not in our division. They'll be digging out of that cap hole for several years. Edited September 25, 2023 by SoMAn 5 3 1 Quote
JerseyBills Posted September 25, 2023 Posted September 25, 2023 So refreshing watching our defense. He's so stiff and lacks instincts. If it wasn't for his size he'd be a bum Quote
GunnerBill Posted September 25, 2023 Posted September 25, 2023 (edited) 26 minutes ago, SoMAn said: This is basically an 'I told you so' thread to all the Edmunds apologists for the past 5 years of excusing his underachieving play. I don't think anyone has a personal axe to grind with Tremaine. A good teammate and great guy by all accounts. I don't believe the criticism has been directed specifically at him, but rather at those who continued to believe the hype from One Bills Drive and the media, that the former first round draft choice was a force on the defense. He wasn't! The stellar play by his young replacement should help convince them. Milano and Bernard may turn out to be a great LB duo. Regardless of the never ending 'athleticism and wingspan' hype, Edmunds was a liability more often than not. Defenders knew they could run right over him and get him out of position on passing plays. For all his natural ability, he lacks the tenacity and instincts to be a top tier defender in the NFL. Thank goodness the Bills were wise enough to spend their money on Oliver and Milano, rather than wasting it on Edmunds. Best wishes to Tremaine. Good for him that the inept Bears management bought into the media B.S. It's a shame they're not in our division. They'll be digging out of that cap hole for several years. I agree with a lot of your post and was always one who lent away from signing him long term. But he was not a "liability more often than not." And that statement is indicative of the hyperbole that always existed on both sides of the Edmunds debate and persists even post his departure. Tremaine had an up and down first year, a good second year, a disappointing year 3 and 4 and a bounce back in year 5. He was more often than not a solid, effective middle linebacker. The knock on him for the most part was that he just never managed to make enough of the game altering plays that you want. And to pay a middle linebacker they can't just be "solid" they have to make a difference because it isn't a premium position. Edmunds was not a difference maker for the majority of his 5 seasons. That is different than being a liability. Liability is what you saw from Dodson and Klein in pre-season. It is what we feared we might be stuck with this season when, in actual fact, Bernard has got better each game and yesterday was a true difference maker. But even if Bernard had just got to "average" I'd rather have average on a 3rd rounder rookie deal than just a tick above on a $15m deal, let alone the $18m AAV that the Bears gave him. Edited September 25, 2023 by GunnerBill 1 2 2 2 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.