Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, FireChans said:

If the player isn't worth a second contract, they aren't worth trading up in the first round for.

But he did get a second contract, the largest for a defensive players ever. Just because the Bills didn’t give it to him, doesn’t mean he wasn’t a solid pick. I’d wager most GMs would take a chance on a 19 year old LB with freakish size 

Posted
28 minutes ago, Billl said:

9 carries for 41 yards.

Do his receiving. Spoilers, he took a 75 yarder to the house because middle zone Tremaine picked the wrong guy. Watch the games lmao.

Just now, Captain Hindsight said:

But he did get a second contract, the largest for a defensive players ever. Just because the Bills didn’t give it to him, doesn’t mean he wasn’t a solid pick. I’d wager most GMs would take a chance on a 19 year old LB with freakish size 

Nah it does. A first round pick is an extremely valuable asset. Even more so when it’s a trade up and not in the late stages of the round. You should spend first round picks on guys/positions where if they are a pretty good player, you don’t let them leave the building. Like QB, WR, EDGE or pressure, CB, LT.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Disagree 2
  • Agree 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, FireChans said:

Do his receiving. Spoilers, he took a 75 yarder to the house because middle zone Tremaine picked the wrong guy. Watch the games lmao.

I literally just watched it.  That wasn’t on Edmunds.  Not sure why it means so much to so many on here to pretend that Edmunds is some disaster of a LB.  He’s not.  

Posted
10 minutes ago, Solomon Grundy said:

I'd rather see a Motor report 😎

Here’s the thing. No one or very few folks were out here claiming that Motor was really this special talent that mere mortals couldn’t help to recognize. He was a solid running back and those aren’t worth paying ever. No ill will.

 

Meanwhile, the Big Scarecrow (tm) is currently manning the 31st defense in the NFL and allowing a 100% completion percentage while being targeted.

3 minutes ago, Billl said:

I literally just watched it.  That wasn’t on Edmunds.  Not sure why it means so much to so many on here to pretend that Edmunds is some disaster of a LB.  He’s not.  

How was it not on Edmunds? He has standard middle zone coverage. He picks right, ball goes left and BANG, touchdown Jordan Love. 

The Scarecrow was supposed to not let angle routes go for 75 yards.

  • Disagree 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, FireChans said:

Do his receiving. Spoilers, he took a 75 yarder to the house because middle zone Tremaine picked the wrong guy. Watch the games lmao.

Nah it does. A first round pick is an extremely valuable asset. Even more so when it’s a trade up and not in the late stages of the round. You should spend first round picks on guys/positions where if they are a pretty good player, you don’t let them leave the building. Like QB, WR, EDGE or pressure, CB, LT.

Maybe like pro bowler Jaire Alexander, taken two slots later. 

Posted
53 minutes ago, Captain Hindsight said:

But he did get a second contract, the largest for a defensive players ever. Just because the Bills didn’t give it to him, doesn’t mean he wasn’t a solid pick. I’d wager most GMs would take a chance on a 19 year old LB with freakish size 

No. That's not even close to true.

He's 31 in total and AAV. What you're probably thinking of is that he signed the largest 4 year contract for an inside linebacker, which is the most baseball stat I've ever heard in reference to a contract.

Posted
37 minutes ago, BullBuchanan said:

No. That's not even close to true.

He's 31 in total and AAV. What you're probably thinking of is that he signed the largest 4 year contract for an inside linebacker, which is the most baseball stat I've ever heard in reference to a contract.

Ah ok. I should work on my reading comprehension 😂 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, FireChans said:

Here’s the thing. No one or very few folks were out here claiming that Motor was really this special talent that mere mortals couldn’t help to recognize. He was a solid running back and those aren’t worth paying ever. No ill will.

 

Meanwhile, the Big Scarecrow (tm) is currently manning the 31st defense in the NFL and allowing a 100% completion percentage while being targeted.

How was it not on Edmunds? He has standard middle zone coverage. He picks right, ball goes left and BANG, touchdown Jordan Love. 

The Scarecrow was supposed to not let angle routes go for 75 yards.

Dude. My god. A) it was 35 yards and b) #53 was covering him, not Edmunds. Hate Edmunds all you want, but please, please don’t make stuff up out of whole cloth to advance a pretty friggin’ dumb crusade built out of misguided spite. It’s unbecoming, as all crusades are. Material evidence: 

.

Edited by dave mcbride
Posted
2 hours ago, gobills404 said:

I’m starting to notice a trend of defenders looking noticeably worse after leaving Buffalo. I think that McD guy might be pretty good at getting the most out of them.

I haven’t heard much about Harrison Phillips, or Levi Wallace

Posted
3 minutes ago, dave mcbride said:

Wallace played well last night. He’s not great but he’s a decent starting-caliber corner.

He almoat had a pic too but hes been very stable for pittsburg

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted (edited)
On 8/27/2023 at 11:15 PM, FireChans said:

There was a weekly “this guy isn’t that bad I swear” report on Edmunds for the last couple years.

 

After watching him whiff yesterday, I’m not sure if he got benched or what, but I’d love to hear some breakdown of the former “ProBowler” and his level of play in a Bears uni. 

 

 

You're a walking example of confirmation bias.

 

Those reports weren't "this guy isn't that bad I swear" reports. Those were the sensible replies to those reports, which were actually, "See, I felt he made a bad play proving he sucks" reports. You were very involved if I remember correctly.

 

Haven't a clue how he played with the Bears. Did you watch the whole game? Oh, you didn't? Yup, more of the same. You saw something that confirmed your previous bias (of course, because that's what happens, it's what confirmation bias is), and so youI'll be sure post even though not fully informed, because it makes you feel good.

 

Kinda sad to still be trying to tickle your same little spot over and over, even though he's not even on the team anymore.

 

 

 

Edited by Thurman#1
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
59 minutes ago, dave mcbride said:

Wallace played well last night. He’s not great but he’s a decent starting-caliber corner.

Did you watch the whole game? Watching the game, I must’ve said to my wife at least 3 times, Wallace is having a rough game.  He dropped an easy interception, lost contain on a 70 yard run, gave up multiple 20 yard completions, and I think had  a penalty.

 

I really liked him with the Bills, and still root for him.  But he was clearly the weak link on the Steelers D against Cleveland.

 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 2
Posted
8 hours ago, Billl said:

He's got 24 tackles and 2 TFLs in two games so far.  That's not exactly terrible.

 

His predecessor at MLB in Buffalo lead the NFL in tackles in 2017..........maybe this is the year he finally reaches that Preston Brown level as a tackle accumulator?

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, dave mcbride said:

Dude. My god. A) it was 35 yards and b) #53 was covering him, not Edmunds. Hate Edmunds all you want, but please, please don’t make stuff up out of whole cloth to advance a pretty friggin’ dumb crusade built out of misguided spite. It’s unbecoming, as all crusades are. Material evidence: 

.

53 was covering Jones. Edmunds has the middle zone. He goes left instead of right, bang TD Packers.  Did you notice there was already a defender on the guy Tremaine went to go help? Lmao.
 

This is the story of Edmunds career. Large completion in his zone? Oh, well it wasn’t technically his man so it’s all good. Misses the ball in the air, resulting in a completion? Oh, it was a tough play for any ILB to make. 
 

It must be nice to be playing the middle in and no matter what happens, it wasn’t your fault. Perks of being a zone coverage scarecrow that can’t cover.

1 hour ago, Thurman#1 said:

 

 

You're a walking example of confirmation bias.

 

Those reports weren't "this guy isn't that bad I swear" reports. Those were the sensible replies to those reports, which were actually, "See, I felt he made a bad play proving he sucks" reports. You were very involved if I remember correctly.

 

Haven't a clue how he played with the Bears. Did you watch the whole game? Oh, you didn't? Yup, more of the same. You saw something that confirmed your previous bias (of course, because that's what happens, it's what confirmation bias is), and so youI'll be sure post even though not fully informed, because it makes you feel good.

 

Kinda sad to still be trying to tickle your same little spot over and over, even though he's not even on the team anymore.

 

 

 

I watched the whole game. What’s it called when you presume something then are biased in confirming that opinion. Hmm, it will come to me. Thanks for playing!

Edited by FireChans
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...