Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

 

 

Fani Willis Fails to Show Up For Debate

April 30, 2024

   

Democratic Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis’ political opponent debated with an empty podium after Willis skipped the county’s first Democratic Party debate, local reports show.

 

Willis is the Georgia district attorney who brought forth the election inference case against former President Trump, charging him and 18 co-defendants with racketeering over allegations they tried to overthrow the 2020 election. Willis became embroiled in controversy when she was accused of having an “improper” relationship with the special counsel she hired, Nathan Wade.

 

A judge ordered Willis last month to either remove herself from the case or fire Wade, with Wade ultimately resigning.

 

The Fulton County Democratic Party held its first primary debate on Sunday, but Willis was a no-show, leaving her political opponent to take the stage alone, where he criticized his fellow Democrat for hiring a romantic partner for the high-level case.

 

https://www.offthepress.com/fani-willis-a-no-show-for-debate/

 

 

.

Posted
3 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

😂

 

 

Another case that is nothing more than a pathetic, failed attempt at smear campaign.  The only thing it's doing is making Trump stronger.  Thank you, Democrats!  What a mess.    

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
10 minutes ago, BillStime said:

Two-tiered justice system.

 

 

Bring on more trials.  Better for the Republicans!  Woo. Hoo!

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Tommy Callahan said:

Another wall that was exposed as Dem lawfare 

 

 

AGAIN, moron tweets stuff to get the nutbars going, even though it's based in either a complete lack of knowledge or straight out lies:

 

One of the most striking features of appellate courts in the United States is also one of the least understood: Appellate courts rarely reverse lower court decisions. The data reviewed in this Article indicate that roughly 90% of appellate court decisions affirm lower court rulings

  • Eyeroll 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, daz28 said:

AGAIN, moron tweets stuff to get the nutbars going, even though it's based in either a complete lack of knowledge or straight out lies:

 

One of the most striking features of appellate courts in the United States is also one of the least understood: Appellate courts rarely reverse lower court decisions. The data reviewed in this Article indicate that roughly 90% of appellate court decisions affirm lower court rulings

It could be because 90% of lower court rulings are based on sound and proper legal arguments and interpretations of the law where this case against Trump and other defendants may not be so clear cut? 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

It could be because 90% of lower court rulings are based on sound and proper legal arguments and interpretations of the law where this case against Trump and other defendants may not be so clear cut? 

Every appeal makes that claim.  Here's what he said, "Am I wrong in thinking that they would not take the appeal unless it was to reverse McAfee and disqualify? Why else take the case and delay the prosecution if only to affirm?".  Yes it is wrong to think that they would take a case, even when they have no reason to reverse, because reversal only happens 10% of the time.  

  • Eyeroll 1
Posted
27 minutes ago, Tommy Callahan said:

You know they effed up when they start playing the race/victim card. 

 

 

 

There's a fine upstanding black woman right there. 🤣

×
×
  • Create New...