Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Tommy Callahan said:

No lie.  The only thing on par is the farm and msm trying so hard to make it seem legit.  

It's nothing like Judge _____ unless they say "and then I proceeded to..." at least 3 times.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
23 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said:

We ain't done yet here, but after a really rough start for Fani (the friend testifying that there was a romantic relationship before she hired Nathan as a special prosecutor), the smoking gun ain't there.

No photos of them sipping out of a 2-straw Pina colada in Belize. No proof that Fani didn't withdraw enough cash over time sufficient to "repay" him. No condo building neighbor to testify that they were spending the night together prior to him being retained.

I'm not buying their story, but the evidence to corroborate the friends' story just isn't there.

You are such a hypocrite!

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
59 minutes ago, Tommy Callahan said:

So much race card

 

 

Who are all these people that have these ideas about what black women should or shouldn't do? It's funny because I only ever hear that notion from one type of person...

Edited by yall
  • Agree 1
Posted
On 2/17/2024 at 8:56 PM, Tommy Callahan said:

Another of the Walls is crumbling. They avoid the heck out of this thread. 

 

while hyperventilating on a Civil case with no victims and another Fani as a DA.

 

What is it with triple-chinned black women (and men) who become DA's and develop a chronic hatred for successful, white conservative men which drives them to launch dubious legal proceedings whilst ignoring real criminal activity?

 

I strongly believe that this is going to bite the Dems on the arse in November.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
8 hours ago, US Egg said:

If Dems can get away it in N.Y. they figure they can get away with it anywhere:

 

 

Didn't they work together at one point?

Posted
1 hour ago, Doc said:

 

Didn't they work together at one point?

Don’t know, but, looks like they will be now.

 

About as Orwellian as it can get.

 

 

Posted


 

 

Fani Willis and Nathan Wade are engaged in a feud against Trump, and most people know that. Whether the case is reasonable or not, defensible or not, the fact is that the credibility of the prosecution is blown. If Willis and Wade skate on a technicality, the justice system will lose what little credibility it still has with anybody to the Right of Rachel Maddow. 

 

 

A prosecutor is called "the state" in legal proceedings, not "Avenging angel.".

 

Legal cases are "the State vs. X." When the objectivity of the prosecution is fundamentally compromised, they shouldn't represent the state--doing so quite literally undermines faith in our system of government, which is the opposite of what such an important government official should be doing. 

 

 

This is why we often talk about the "appearance of impropriety" as important. When a sufficient number of people have a reasonable suspicion that a state official--say a judge or prosecutor--has a personal agenda, it is profoundly destructive to social trust. 

 

 

https://hotair.com/david-strom/2024/02/22/lawyers-are-looking-at-williswade-disqualification-the-wrong-way-n3783372

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, B-Man said:

Fani Willis and Nathan Wade are engaged in a feud against Trump, and most people know that. Whether the case is reasonable or not, defensible or not, the fact is that the credibility of the prosecution is blown. If Willis and Wade skate on a technicality, the justice system will lose what little credibility it still has with anybody to the Right of Rachel Maddow. 

 

 

A prosecutor is called "the state" in legal proceedings, not "Avenging angel.".

 

Legal cases are "the State vs. X." When the objectivity of the prosecution is fundamentally compromised, they shouldn't represent the state--doing so quite literally undermines faith in our system of government, which is the opposite of what such an important government official should be doing. 

 

 

This is why we often talk about the "appearance of impropriety" as important. When a sufficient number of people have a reasonable suspicion that a state official--say a judge or prosecutor--has a personal agenda, it is profoundly destructive to social trust. 

 

 

https://hotair.com/david-strom/2024/02/22/lawyers-are-looking-at-williswade-disqualification-the-wrong-way-n3783372

 

The left doesn't care.  They talk a good gamer about needing 100% proof of corruption by Joke, but when a woman can claim she was raped by Trump with zero evidence and a shifting story and he can be fined $350M for a bogus reason, that's fine because they hate him.

Edited by Doc
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Tommy Callahan said:

 

 

I just want to find 11,780 votes

I just want to find 11,780 votes

I just want to find 11,780 votes

I just want to find 11,780 votes

I just want to find 11,780 votes

I just want to find 11,780 votes

I just want to find 11,780 votes

I just want to find 11,780 votes

 

Nothing else matters, Chris

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Tommy Callahan said:

 

 

Left alone with big fat Fani, she was such a naughty DA...

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
19 hours ago, Doc said:

 

Left alone with big fat Fani, she was such a naughty DA...


 

I just want to find 11,780 votes

I just want to find 11,780 votes

I just want to find 11,780 votes

I just want to find 11,780 votes

I just want to find 11,780 votes

I just want to find 11,780 votes

I just want to find 11,780 votes

I just want to find 11,780 votes

 

Nothing else matters, DoC

Edited by BillStime
×
×
  • Create New...