Fani Willis: Corrupt Marxist BLM Activist. Met with WH before Indicting Lawfare Victim Trump

[AlBUNDY4TDS]

On 5/8/2024 at 10:06 AM, BillStime said:

Two-tiered justice system.

 

 

You really are the biggest joke on this board, and it's not even close.

[BillStime]

14 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said:

You really are the biggest joke on this board, and it's not even close.

 

Thanks Trumpy - means a lot coming from you... 😋

 

 

 

 

[daz28]

43 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said:

You really are the biggest joke on this board, and it's not even close.

NC Karen created a thread with a fix for this.  He updates it with silly memes just in case anyone forgets.  

[AlBUNDY4TDS]

Just now, daz28 said:

NC Karen created a thread with a fix for this.  He updates it with silly memes just in case anyone forgets.  

Aww billsy has an ally, cute.

[daz28]

8 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said:

Aww billsy has an ally, cute.

I'm an ally with anyone who's against Nazi censorship of opposing views.  

[Biden is Mentally Fit]

1 minute ago, daz28 said:

I'm an ally with anyone who's against Nazi censorship of opposing views.  

Any chance you can steer us towards your thoughts on the Biden administrations efforts to censor social media, most particularly during Covid? It’s not really in question that they were doing that. Seems nazi-ish.
 

Also, the repeated use of NAZI by people like you and billstime is childish.

[AlBUNDY4TDS]

6 minutes ago, daz28 said:

I'm an ally with anyone who's against Nazi censorship of opposing views.  

U mean democrats? They try damn hard to censor their political opponents and they have the backing of the establishment media.

[daz28]

27 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

Any chance you can steer us towards your thoughts on the Biden administrations efforts to censor social media, most particularly during Covid? It’s not really in question that they were doing that. Seems nazi-ish.
 

Also, the repeated use of NAZI by people like you and billstime is childish.

Both sides were asking media sites to not display some content, which I don't like, but it only becomes a problem when they face sanctions for NOT doing so.  As far as I know, the only one threatening sanctions were 'anti-bias' laws proposed by the right.  A social media company(or any company) can and should be able to restrict whatever content they choose, because freedom.  Creating laws to dictate to them what content they can/cannot would be Nazi-ish.  Childish maybe, but it hammers the point home.  

 

 

23 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said:

U mean democrats? They try damn hard to censor their political opponents and they have the backing of the establishment media.

If you mean cancel culture, sure it goes too far quite often, but as long as the government stays out of it, then that's fine.  People and corporations are free to say what they wish, and they're equally allowed to react to others speech as they see fit.  The 1st Amendment doesn't protect people from repercussions to their words/actions from other citizens.  

Edited May 9, 2024 by daz28

[Biden is Mentally Fit]

34 minutes ago, daz28 said:

Both sides were asking media sites to not display some content, which I don't like, but it only becomes a problem when they face sanctions for NOT doing so.  As far as I know, the only one threatening sanctions were 'anti-bias' laws proposed by the right.  A social media company(or any company) can and should be able to restrict whatever content they choose, because freedom.  Creating laws to dictate to them what content they can/cannot would be Nazi-ish.  Childish maybe, but it hammers the point home.  

You seem not so much an ally with those fighting censorship as you declared yourself earlier, but more ally-ish depending on the situation. 

 

As to the bolded, it doesn’t. The overuse of the word by pinheaded hysterics has turned it trite. 

Edited May 9, 2024 by JDHillFan
With, not against. Poor wordsmithing on my part

[BillsFanNC]

 

[BillsFanNC]

 

[B-Man]

 

MORE:

 

 

Georgia appeals court HALTS trial of Trump
and codefendants so it can review 'conflict'
challenge to Fani Willis based on her affair

by Geoff Earle

 

A Georgia appeals court has put one of Donald Trump's four criminal trials on hold, pausing his election interference case there to allow for a challenge based on Fulton County DA Fani Willis' affair with a prosecutor. The move comes after Georgia judge Scott McAfee issued a ruling allowing Willis to remain in her role as prosecutor after holding bombshell hearings on her affair with former special prosecutor Nathan Wade. The hearing featured dramatic testimony about lavish vacations and angry disputes about when the affair began and whether it had the potential to compromise the appearance or the fact of a fair trial.

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13499297/Georgia-appeals-court-trial-Trump-codefendants-challenge-Fani-Willis-affair.html
 

.

 

[B-Man]

 

 

 

[BillsFanNC]

 

[B-Man]

 

 

Oh No !  

 

Fani lied ?

 

 

 

[Scraps]

2 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Oh No !  

 

Fani lied ?

 

 

 

How is this a problem?  The incident happened within the last 2 weeks.  Nathan Wade isn't on the case, not that there was any conflict of interest to begin with.

[B-Man]

53 minutes ago, Scraps said:

How is this a problem?  The incident happened within the last 2 weeks.  Nathan Wade isn't on the case, not that there was any conflict of interest to begin with.

 

 

[Scraps]

4 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

If she was dating the judge, that would be a conflict of interest.

If she was dating one of the defense attorneys or staff member, that could be a conflict of interest if the accused was unaware of it.

If she is dating a prosecutor, how is that a conflict of interest?  They're both on the same side of the v in Georgia v Trump.

Edited September 4, 2024 by Scraps

[B-Man]

 

No show after subpoenaed 

 

 

[BillsFanNC]

 

No, the dems won't cheat.  They would never....