Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
25 minutes ago, EmotionallyUnstable said:

I have two thoughts on this:

 

1) Is this a GOOD thing that our depth a CB is so strong, or a BAD thing that we can’t even figure out who CB2 should be…

 

2) If it is the former, then you have to seriously wonder if moving on from Tre White is in play next season. 

I think it’s a good thing. He has all the lockdown physical tools and needs to learn to work within zone which was never his strength. In the meantime you have two solid zone corners holding it down, whether Jackson or Benford, and if there’s anything McD and Butler can do well it’s develop DBs.

 

I could only call it a bust if he doesn’t work out by the end of year 3 when you’re going into needing to decide on 5th year option. They’re barely paying 3 guy’s anything to be solid options opposite of Tre. 
 

And maybe in addition to a a rotation at CB2, if we’re that good at the position, rotate Tre out very seldomly to prolong that career. I know that will bring the pitchforks but it makes sense long-term. Elam has shown better run defense/tackling over college and tackling is a Tre deficiency. So, obvious run situations and still, very seldomly.

Edited by anguskeenan
Posted
25 minutes ago, EmotionallyUnstable said:

I have two thoughts on this:

 

1) Is this a GOOD thing that our depth a CB is so strong, or a BAD thing that we can’t even figure out who CB2 should be…

 

2) If it is the former, then you have to seriously wonder if moving on from Tre White is in play next season. 

It's the latter.

 

It is one thing if Benford/Jackson were playing like All-Pros or even high end starters. Unfortunately, they (and Elam) are all in that "serviceable" bucket.

 

Levi Wallace was serviceable. We got rid of him and drafted Elam, which was a clear signal that the Bills wanted to upgrade at the CB2 position. Strategically, it made a lot of sense, a cheap, cost-controlled first rounder to pair until Tre White's contract was over or we moved on.

 

In an ideal world, Elam would have taken the starting job last year (he had a perfect opportunity with only Dane above him on the depth chart), and he failed to do so.   Even worse, now with a year of NFL experience, he can't separate from lesser players physically.

 

Now, all that being said, there's a non-zero chance Tre White is on the chopping block after 2023 regardless if he looks like the ghost he did last year. Hopefully, he shakes off the cobwebs and returns to form.

9 minutes ago, Coach Tuesday said:


It may have been bound to happen but the timing of a completely crap draft couldn’t have been worse - the entire 2022 draft is looking like a throwaway.  Benford and maybe Cook can partially salvage it, but considering what the Chiefs pulled from that draft class (and the Jets who took 2 likely All Pros in Round 1 alone), the Bills lost a major opportunity to capitalize on the end of Allen’s cheap window.

It gave me 2016 vibes. Sometimes you don't need to wait three years to realize the whole group wasn't up to snuff.

 

If Benford and Cook can also see PT, it will soften the blow, but agreed entirely.

1 hour ago, HappyDays said:

Elam is trending towards bust status. He is the only 1st round pick under this regime to not be a full time starter by his 2nd season. Not too late to turn it around but the clock is ticking. If he is a bust it sucks but it happens to every team. Chiefs, Bengals, Eagles, 49ers, all had 1st round busts within the last few years. We've been spoiled by the fact that each of our 1st round picks since McDermott took over have become at least capable starters. This was bound to happen eventually.

I will be surprised if Elam is a Bill in 2024.

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, eball said:

...so, I know a lot of folks are ready with the pitchforks for Beane if Elam doesn't win the CB2 job, and certainly that is a disappointing result given his draft status...but if Benford wins the job because he is a player who was severely under-drafted but is actually very good, and the Bills still have a guy like Elam (who has talent) for depth, is it really a problem?

 

He didn’t get beat out by some late round pick who exploded onto the scene.  On Sunday, he looked like they pulled someone out of the stands and handed him a helmet.  He was bad bad.

 

On his first drive, the last drive of the first half, he gave up three completions.  Then he got flagged for PI in the end zone.  Then he gave up another completion for a TD.  Then, on the first play in the second half, the WR barely pushes him blocking on a running play and he just falls over backwards ass over teakettle like he got run over by a truck.

Edited by Billl
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

Just a wild guess and hope, but maybe Sean liked a lot of how Elam plays but maybe there's one aspect he wants Elam to clean up (handsiness?) and this is a short-term message. Again, just a hope. To only have Cook start from the entire 2022 class would be horrible.

  • Agree 1
Posted

We are one bad hammy or sprained ankle away from the next guy. If that is a close decision that is not a terrible situation, because you may need the next guy on the next play. 

Posted (edited)

My problem is we need to play more aggressive on defense. The way you can do that is take more chances and blitz more, or play more man. Given the fact McDermott seems intent on repeating the zone heavy scheme I don’t see a far departure in defensive philosophy from Frazier happening.
 

Elam can play press man better than Benford or Dane. Just last week we all saw Poyer take a bad angle and get beat to the edge. So while the safeties are getting older and slower, we seem intent on playing a soft shell defense. That can actually be worse than playing press with Elam. McDermott should rethink his defensive strategy and personnel for 2023.

Edited by Dr.Sack
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 2
Posted
4 hours ago, eball said:

...so, I know a lot of folks are ready with the pitchforks for Beane if Elam doesn't win the CB2 job, and certainly that is a disappointing result given his draft status...but if Benford wins the job because he is a player who was severely under-drafted but is actually very good, and the Bills still have a guy like Elam (who has talent) for depth, is it really a problem?

 

 

Kind of like this

 

Elam = Lance

Benford = Purdy

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, stinky finger said:

 

Kind of like this

 

Elam = Lance

Benford = Purdy

Except Elam > Benford in man coverage. You don’t play the Fins, Chiefs or Bengals with a soft cover 2 zone. You press man them and jam them right on the snap. Elam is being misused in a conservative bend but don’t break scheme. Watch Poyer and Hyde continue to be a step too slow and the zone defense suddenly has gaping holes, especially considering Edmunds is no longer shutting down the middle further stressing the safeties. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 3
Posted
1 minute ago, Dr.Sack said:

Except Elam > Benford in man coverage. You don’t play the Fins, Chiefs or Bengals with a soft cover 2 zone. You press man them and jam them right on the snap. Elam is being misused in a conservative bend but don’t break scheme. Watch Poyer and Hyde continue to be a step too slow and the zone defense suddenly has gaping holes, especially considering Edmunds is no longer shutting down the middle further stressing the safeties. 

 

Agree

 

I was merely drawing a comparison to the OPs premise.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted (edited)

he was a puzzling pick to start with.  A press player for a zone D.  Typical of Bean targeting a position and ending up with suboptimal value in a round (ex Basham).  

 

I also agree with above posters who feel we should play a more aggressive D, and that would fit Elam’s skillset. 

Edited by RyanC883
  • Agree 1
Posted

If Benford is as good as he seems to be, I think the Bills are fine at CB.  IIn theory, you want a first round draft pick to be on the field, but in the grand scheme of things, this is a tiny problem for the Bills compared with a couple other issues the Bills are dealing with.

Posted

My confusion on Elam is that maybe he simply needs to learn by fire, and Jackson is not good but simply average. I definitely want Elam on field as much as possible and let's find out if he is worth the pick. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Orlando Tim said:

My confusion on Elam is that maybe he simply needs to learn by fire, and Jackson is not good but simply average. I definitely want Elam on field as much as possible and let's find out if he is worth the pick. 


Learning by fire isn’t worth the downside. He doesn’t grasp zone and he grabs at wideouts to keep up. He was handsy in college and now he’s stuck in an unnatural assignment. 
 

It should be reiterated Beane traded UP for Elam.

5 minutes ago, BarleyNY said:

And that’s the rub. The Bills have tried to improve on Jackson, but it hasn’t worked out yet. 


What rub? Is that a compliment?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
23 minutes ago, RyanC883 said:

he was a puzzling pick to start with.  A press player for a zone D.  Typical of Bean targeting a position and ending up with suboptimal value in a round (ex Basham).  

 

I also agree with above posters who feel we should play a more aggressive D, and that would fit Elam’s skillset. 

 

The Bills put themselves into a position where they had to take a CB. No obvious answer at CB2 and Tre was injured. Then KC jumped us for McDuffie - and we took our shot on Elam. 

Edited by BarleyNY
Posted
1 hour ago, ToGoGo said:

Elam seems dumb and immature to me compared to a typical McBeane era Bills player? 
 

Anyone else get that vibe from him? Florida thing? 

 

No, I get the opposite vibe. I think he wants it so bad he is trying too hard and thinking too much. You can't think in football, you just have to play. I know he has been working crazy hard but he looked worse against the Steelers than I've ever seen him. To me that means it is all in his head.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
Posted
12 hours ago, eball said:

...so, I know a lot of folks are ready with the pitchforks for Beane if Elam doesn't win the CB2 job, and certainly that is a disappointing result given his draft status...but if Benford wins the job because he is a player who was severely under-drafted but is actually very good, and the Bills still have a guy like Elam (who has talent) for depth, is it really a problem?

 


no problem… lots of teams use the first pick to obtain starters they hope have a shot at being excellent.

 

it makes sense to outsmart the others by going depth in the first round and finding staters late in the draft

 

  • Haha (+1) 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...