GoBills808 Posted August 25, 2023 Posted August 25, 2023 2 hours ago, FireChans said: He’s so bad that Beane and co. watched Bernard and Dodson and said “yeah, we still don’t wanna pay him” lol He wasn't too bad for the Bills to re sign, he was too expensive Quote
FireChans Posted August 25, 2023 Posted August 25, 2023 48 minutes ago, GoBills808 said: He wasn't too bad for the Bills to re sign, he was too expensive Correct. Beane saw Bernard and Dodson and said, “I’d rather play them than give Edmunds that contract” lol Quote
GoBills808 Posted August 25, 2023 Posted August 25, 2023 6 minutes ago, FireChans said: Correct. Beane saw Bernard and Dodson and said, “I’d rather play them than give Edmunds that contract” lol That's a guess He said I'd rather play them, plus explore all other options that are available to me at the time, and then made the decision And I doubt this was solely Beane's call 1 1 Quote
FireChans Posted August 25, 2023 Posted August 25, 2023 (edited) 47 minutes ago, GoBills808 said: That's a guess He said I'd rather play them, plus explore all other options that are available to me at the time, and then made the decision And I doubt this was solely Beane's call That's pretty hair splitty for me but sure. He took the unknown + Bernard + Dodson over paying Tremaine. Edited August 25, 2023 by FireChans Quote
Ethan in Cleveland Posted August 25, 2023 Posted August 25, 2023 2 hours ago, FireChans said: Meh, as long as they can play the run decently I’m not sweating. On the back end, if Poyer/Hyde/White can perform to their usual standards, I doubt our pass defense takes much of a dive if at all. I'm with you. The secondary should be much better next year. I think the myth of Edmunds protecting the middle was way overblown. He wasn't that good in coverage, pretty bad in man to man actually, and had very few pass break ups. He did have some so I'm not saying he was a liability in coverage, I'm just saying I don't think he was the difference maker some on here thought he was. Obviously we will found out soon enough. Quote
FireChans Posted August 25, 2023 Posted August 25, 2023 3 minutes ago, Ethan in Cleveland said: I'm with you. The secondary should be much better next year. I think the myth of Edmunds protecting the middle was way overblown. He wasn't that good in coverage, pretty bad in man to man actually, and had very few pass break ups. He did have some so I'm not saying he was a liability in coverage, I'm just saying I don't think he was the difference maker some on here thought he was. Obviously we will found out soon enough. I don't think it was a myth, particularly last year. Last year was his best year in coverage by a MILE. He allowed a passer rating of 69.9 last year. The two years prior his number was >100. Now that's a flawed stat at Edmunds position in particular, but I think last year he was necessary for our pass coverage because of how piss poor the secondary was at times. This year, we have the boys all back. Edmunds/Hamlin/Dane/Poyer/CB2 rotation vs Dodson/Hyde/Tre/Poyer/CB2 rotation isn't really close imo in comparing pass defenses. I go with option #2 all day long. Quote
Chandler#81 Posted August 26, 2023 Posted August 26, 2023 On 8/24/2023 at 6:40 PM, JayBaller10 said: Are those 10 mins or so of preseason action riskier than the 1,020 minutes of football all starters will play over a 17 game regular season? Thanks for asking. Yes. Especially so when it’s your franchise QB in a preseason game that doesn’t count. 😒 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.