Jump to content

The Ringer ranking of Receiver Cores - Opinions???


Billsfan1972

Recommended Posts

As said until the season starts I really don't get too excited (thus my departure annually after the Bills are eliminated & I no longer posts and obsess on play calling).

 

The point is look at the top of the list and how they make qb's better and then there's Mahomes and Allen having to make due.....

 

Interesting MVP Candidates Burrow, Hurts & Herbert there along with the overpaid and disliked Cousins, of course the overhyped Cowboys and Dak and most protected qb (anyone playing for the 49'ers).

Edited by Billsfan1972
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DCofNC said:

Seems the rest of the world is catching on to what I’ve been saying.  It’s Diggs and a bunch of JAGs.

Knox is not a great receiver and hasn’t been used as one much either.

Over the past two seasons he has over 1100 yards receiving and 15 touchdowns. Not All Pro level numbers but pretty good considering the personal tragedy he was dealing with.
 

Not saying it would make a huge difference but he does factor into a receiver analysis especially with some potential coverage relief in Kincaid. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funny...that ranking seems to be of the opinion that the Bills have better passing game weaponry than the Chiefs.

All I've heard around here lately is how Patrick Mahomes' receiving corps is sooooo much better than Josh Allen's. Huh.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Bills to me are probably somewhere between 10-15 at this point to me. Diggs is a top 5 WR. Gabe is a top 40ish guy. Knox and Kincaid are a top 7 or 8 TE room (and potentially better). Harty, Sherfield and Shakir are middle of the pack depth. Cook is a top 15 receiving back (and potentially even better). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Warriorspikes51 said:

 


If Kincaid doesn't get the ball often because "he has learn to block defensive ends" then the Bills shouldn't have drafted him. 


They also didn't mention Harty. If he stays healthy, he's a dynamic player 

Apparently Knox is persona non grata as well 🙄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DCofNC said:

Knox is not a great receiver and hasn’t been used as one much either.

Come to think of it, I’ve never heard Josh talk about Knox in the way he describes Kincaid: “fun to throw to/good body language/etc,” but the addition of Kincaid does sound like Knox has upped his game (or maybe he’s the forgotten man?). This is the first camp I’ve heard Knox being mentioned almost daily in a positive write up.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Logic said:

Funny...that ranking seems to be of the opinion that the Bills have better passing game weaponry than the Chiefs.

All I've heard around here lately is how Patrick Mahomes' receiving corps is sooooo much better than Josh Allen's. Huh.


Nobody here really says that.  
 

What is said, quite frequently, is that KC has had a better offensive mind leading the team in Andy Reid, has put forth a much better Offensive Line around Mahomes and that those things, plus Kelce, allow them to perform at a high level even without Tyreek Hill. 
 

What is also said, is that they are not devoid of investment at WR.. 

 

They traded for a recent RD1 WR who wasn’t a fit on the team that drafted him after the coaching change.  They brought in a WR3 to give them a vet presence.  Then drafted, in consecutive years, RD2 WR’s.  
 

We have Diggs as our major investment at WR (money and/or draft capital).   Then a RD4 WR in Gabe Davis that has been a success, potentially a major success depending on his season this year.   Then after him, what we had last year was an embarrassment.   This year, we still have the RD5 WR, plus another RD5 WR and some veterans that, while nothing that really moves the needle, should be upgrades in WR depth. 
 

With the additions of McGovern, Torrence and Kincaid.. I have high hopes for this Offense.  The OL should be much better and the WR/TE’s as a group are much better than middle of the pack if factoring in Knox and the potential of Kincaid.  
 

But the criticisms up to this off-season of what Beane and staff has surrounded Josh Allen with, compared to Mahomes & Burrow, are very valid. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ScottLaw said:

That’s because your reading comprehension isn’t any good… 


You:

"What dime a dozen talent had Mahomes turned into contributors?

 

He has had a lot more to work with than Allen."



Also you:

"Hill and Kelce coupled with Mahomes was the best in the league… better than anything the Bills have ever given Allen and even with the Hill trade they still had JuJu and MVS with Kelce… not great receivers but not nobody’s/scrubs like the Bills trotted out last season behind Diggs and the inconsistent Davis. … the investment also isn’t nearly the same as the Bills lack there of."
 


Don't pretend like you haven't been beating the "KC consistently gives Mahomes better receivers" drum recently.

But let's suppose you were only talking about the past there, and not the present. Do you still feel like KC has a better receiving corps than Buffalo this season? 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BuffaninSarasota said:

CORPS:

a body of people engaged in a particular activity.

"the press corps"   ..... or WIDE RECEIVERS, IN THIS CASE

 

CORE:

"the central or most important part of something"


 

In the case of the BiIls, it’s wide receiver corpse. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Logic said:


You:

"What dime a dozen talent had Mahomes turned into contributors?

 

He has had a lot more to work with than Allen."



Also you:

"Hill and Kelce coupled with Mahomes was the best in the league… better than anything the Bills have ever given Allen and even with the Hill trade they still had JuJu and MVS with Kelce… not great receivers but not nobody’s/scrubs like the Bills trotted out last season behind Diggs and the inconsistent Davis. … the investment also isn’t nearly the same as the Bills lack there of."
 


Don't pretend like you haven't been beating the "KC consistently gives Mahomes better receivers" drum recently.

But let's suppose you were only talking about the past there, and not the present. Do you still feel like KC has a better receiving corps than Buffalo this season? 
 

are you denying that KC has consistently done a better job surrounding Mahomes w offensive talent?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like others said, I don't have a problem with the ranking, but it should list Knox instead of Shakir.  I think we are somewhere in that 12-20 range.  This will obviously improve if Davis takes a step up and Kincaid turns out to be a real weapon.  Maybe just wishful thinking, but I feel like there is some real untapped potential with our group.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...