Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Between Brown’s play and his health history, he’s who immediately worry about but Dawkins don’t make me warm and fuzzy either. I’ll admit that past those two I really don’t know what’s or what we got concerning this position. I’m seeing some articles about Cleveland having a surplus of OTs and some are rumoring that OT James Hudson III may become available. The little I read about him he seems to be an intriguing prospect. Any suggestions regarding this state of affairs is welcomed, maybe some of you know who would be a good addition for us, I think that we might need some help here.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Vomit 1
  • Eyeroll 4
  • Disagree 2
  • Agree 2
Posted

Why would the Browns trade Hudson? He has been starting in Conklin's absence in pre-season. I know a few people are giddy about Dawand Jones against 2nd and 3rd teamers but Hudson remains clearly above him in the eyes of the Cleveland staff.

 

They won't be giving him away.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

If you're looking for help at a position going into the season from the outside good luck getting it at offensive tackle.  I think the Bills are frustratingly content with what they have on the roster so I don't see a Kelvin Beachum like trade happening.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 3
Posted
15 minutes ago, Doc Brown said:

If you're looking for help at a position going into the season from the outside good luck getting it at offensive tackle.  I think the Bills are frustratingly content with what they have on the roster so I don't see a Kelvin Beachum like trade happening.

 

I like that idea more than Hudson. But I agree don't see it. 

  • Agree 2
Posted

So you are "really concerned" about our depth, but admit you have no idea who they are?  Is that worth making a thread about?

 

"Guys, I don't know the first thing about the socioeconomic situation in Argentina, but I'm really concerned about if their adherence to the Gregorian calendar affects their ability to service underprivileged youth during holidays and I felt everyone needed to know that."

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Eyeroll 3
  • Haha (+1) 3
  • Awesome! (+1) 2
  • Dislike 1
Posted
26 minutes ago, 1ManRaid said:

So you are "really concerned" about our depth, but admit you have no idea who they are?  Is that worth making a thread about?

 

"Guys, I don't know the first thing about the socioeconomic situation in Argentina, but I'm really concerned about if their adherence to the Gregorian calendar affects their ability to service underprivileged youth during holidays and I felt everyone needed to know that."

 

I can see subtlety and kindness are not your strong suits. 😁

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 3
Posted

It's pretty rare to have good starters at every single position. I don't think it is the case for any team in the NFL, including the Chiefs, Bengals, and any other good team out there.

 

And there will always be one or two positions of concern for the Bills, no matter what. That is just how it is in the NFL. There will be strengths and weaknesses for every team.

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Agree 3
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
1 hour ago, 1ManRaid said:

 

"Guys, I don't know the first thing about the socioeconomic situation in Argentina, .........."

 

Prodigious inflation, political turmoil and an unstable currency, but nice weather, great fishing and really cool Andes mountains.

Posted

I think the Hudson trade idea started with this Bleacher Report article  on trade ideas. I don’t see the Browns moving him unless they got an outstanding offer. He’s been their swing tackle and comes in as a TE in heavy formations. While Jones has taken over the backup RT spot, Hudson is the only player on the team - other than the starter Wills - that has experience at LT. The Browns won’t want to open that hole up on the roster. 

  • Agree 2
Posted
1 hour ago, MJS said:

It's pretty rare to have good starters at every single position. I don't think it is the case for any team in the NFL, including the Chiefs, Bengals, and any other good team out there.

 

And there will always be one or two positions of concern for the Bills, no matter what. That is just how it is in the NFL. There will be strengths and weaknesses for every team.


It just so happens this particular weakness is the second most important position on the team.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Disagree 2
  • Agree 1
Posted

Quessenberry, Anderson, VandeMark, Doyle...and a couple others. I think  Beane waits for cuts and looks for T depth. If he does make a trade, what do you think he could get for Lawson?

Posted
43 minutes ago, Herb Nightly said:

Quessenberry, Anderson, VandeMark, Doyle...and a couple others. I think  Beane waits for cuts and looks for T depth. If he does make a trade, what do you think he could get for Lawson?

They could probably get me.  I’m sure my wife would trade me for Shaq.  He’s got $

  • Haha (+1) 3
Posted
2 hours ago, sherpa said:

 

Prodigious inflation, political turmoil and an unstable currency, but nice weather, great fishing and really cool Andes mountains.

And seriously good beef, but in my opinion not as good as is found in Sao Paolo.  But I digress.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Doc Brown said:

If you're looking for help at a position going into the season from the outside good luck getting it at offensive tackle.  I think the Bills are frustratingly content with what they have on the roster so I don't see a Kelvin Beachum like trade happening.

 

If they were content, I don't think they would have signed Shell if the offseason. 

 

With Shell's sudden retirement, I imagine they are discontent - as they should be.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, MJS said:

It's pretty rare to have good starters at every single position. I don't think it is the case for any team in the NFL, including the Chiefs, Bengals, and any other good team out there.

 

And there will always be one or two positions of concern for the Bills, no matter what. That is just how it is in the NFL. There will be strengths and weaknesses for every team.

 

Of course, this is true.  But if you have Lombardi aspirations, I think you want a better OL than the one you have right now.

 

Josh Allen is both the most expensive player on the field and the most valuable.  He needs a capable bodyguard.  I wasn't hoping for a good OL this year, merely an average one.  With our OTs, I question if we can even attain mediocrity.  And if Dawkins gets hurt...  well, that's a frightening thought.  

  • Eyeroll 1
  • Agree 1
Posted

Oh my, even more “concern” what ever shall we do…, 

  • Like (+1) 1
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...