LeGOATski Posted August 17, 2023 Posted August 17, 2023 1 hour ago, AuntieEm said: Yes likely unless you were there to witness the event as it unfolded. He will be judged by a more capable judge if you have faith in God or just believe in karma as a balance that has a one scientific reasoning that will one day be formulated by top researchers. After all positive and negative ions exist. KArma is the balance between the 2. Karma is part of a religious belief, it's not related to ionic bonding. Maybe Newton's 3rd Law is where you're going with this in relation to karma. Every action has an equal and opposite reaction. 36 minutes ago, corta765 said: He is also still looking for the murderer! A true hero 3 Quote
AuntieEm Posted August 17, 2023 Posted August 17, 2023 9 minutes ago, LeGOATski said: Karma is part of a religious belief, it's not related to ionic bonding. Maybe Newton's 3rd Law is where you're going with this in relation to karma. Every action has an equal and opposite reaction. A true hero Well I do think people reap what they sow somewhat so I won't claim OJ is a victim here, just he was not proven to be the killer beyond a shadow of s doubt. Just how it is. I didn't hear any beyond doubt evidence at trial. Iß this even more of an issue of someone wealthy enough got enough taint on the evidence prosecutor collected. 1 Quote
rusty shackleford Posted August 17, 2023 Posted August 17, 2023 He sure could gash up his opposition. 1 1 Quote
WhoTom Posted August 17, 2023 Posted August 17, 2023 4 hours ago, Chandler#81 said: For the record, I’m convinced beyond a shadow of a doubt he did it. The jury though, found otherwise.. Two things sealed that case for the defense: 1. The police captain who led the investigation had previously spoken publicly against interracial marriage. When asked whether the police planted evidence, he took the Fifth. That's reasonable doubt right there. 2. The glove didn't fit. As soon as Johnnie Cochran made it rhyme, there was no chance for a conviction. Honestly, I'm also 100% certain that he did it and I was pissed when the verdict came back not guilty, but I understand why and, in retrospect, if I were on the jury and heard that evidence, I'd probably have voted to acquit also. The prosecution was inept. 2 Quote
Buffalo716 Posted August 17, 2023 Posted August 17, 2023 (edited) 13 minutes ago, WhoTom said: Two things sealed that case for the defense: 1. The police captain who led the investigation had previously spoken publicly against interracial marriage. When asked whether the police planted evidence, he took the Fifth. That's reasonable doubt right there. 2. The glove didn't fit. As soon as Johnnie Cochran made it rhyme, there was no chance for a conviction. Honestly, I'm also 100% certain that he did it and I was pissed when the verdict came back not guilty, but I understand why and, in retrospect, if I were on the jury and heard that evidence, I'd probably have voted to acquit also. The prosecution was inept. Prosecution was inept... Except rick Rubin who was VP of aris isotoner gloves ... Who knew every single model ever made by the company over a hundred years Said on stand that the glove used in the trial was shrunk.. not original size It was a model extra large that somehow became the size of barely a large.. of course it didn't fit OJ's hand anymore Edited August 17, 2023 by Buffalo716 Quote
WhoTom Posted August 17, 2023 Posted August 17, 2023 14 minutes ago, Buffalo716 said: Prosecution was inept... Except rick Rubin who was VP of aris isotoner gloves ... Who knew every single model ever made by the company over a hundred years Said on stand that the glove used in the trial was shrunk.. not original size It was a model extra large that somehow became the size of barely a large.. of course it didn't fit OJ's hand anymore The glove was evidence submitted by the prosecution. If they knew it didn't fit, regardless of shrinkage, then they shouldn't have had him try it on in court. The visual (coupled with the rhyme) is a more powerful influence on the jury than an executive's testimony. I remember experts discussing the glove thing after it happened, saying that you should never ask a question of a witness unless you already know the answer and it works in your favor. I suppose it's possible that if the prosecution hadn't mentioned the glove, then the defense would have anyway, knowing that it didn't fit. But then they'd have to admit that a bloody glove was found in his car. 1 Quote
Aussie Joe Posted August 17, 2023 Posted August 17, 2023 Still searching for the killers … on the golf course Quote
Buffalo716 Posted August 17, 2023 Posted August 17, 2023 (edited) 57 minutes ago, WhoTom said: The glove was evidence submitted by the prosecution. If they knew it didn't fit, regardless of shrinkage, then they shouldn't have had him try it on in court. The visual (coupled with the rhyme) is a more powerful influence on the jury than an executive's testimony. I remember experts discussing the glove thing after it happened, saying that you should never ask a question of a witness unless you already know the answer and it works in your favor. I suppose it's possible that if the prosecution hadn't mentioned the glove, then the defense would have anyway, knowing that it didn't fit. But then they'd have to admit that a bloody glove was found in his car. Well that's why the prosecution is inept... People forget one glove was found at OJ's house... And the other glove at the crime scene iirc It also wouldn't be hard to shrink the glove beforehand and leave it at the crime scene to purposely hide tracks Edited August 17, 2023 by Buffalo716 1 Quote
PonyBoy Posted August 17, 2023 Posted August 17, 2023 The 2 handed gimme 10 after touchdown with #62 @ 3:18 mark was classic! I forgot about those. 1 Quote
julian Posted August 17, 2023 Posted August 17, 2023 2000+ yards in 14 games in an era where defenses were built to stop the run. its absolutely ridiculous. 3 1 1 Quote
Shaw66 Posted August 17, 2023 Posted August 17, 2023 2 hours ago, sherpa said: Simpson's eyes tell the tale. There are rare videos out that see into his helmet at his eyes. Those videos show his kinesthetic sense, which is the ability to read body language and move accordingly. When he got in space, his eyes were always on the next guy. He already had the first guy beat. Larry Byrd was similarly gifted. He could diagram every one of his team mates and the defenders on the way down the court. A singularly amazing athlete. He said he wore short sleeves in any weather, because it help him feel where the tacklers were. 3 Quote
PatsFanNH Posted August 17, 2023 Posted August 17, 2023 8 hours ago, Chandler#81 said: He put Buffalo on the global sports front page. Despite the horrific crime he likely committed much later in life, he was absolutely MUST SEE tv! Here’s a great video compilation of his Buffalo Bill on field exploits. He sliced and diced better than any RB in the NFL history. Lol 1 Quote
rusty shackleford Posted August 17, 2023 Posted August 17, 2023 1 hour ago, WhoTom said: The glove was evidence submitted by the prosecution. If they knew it didn't fit, regardless of shrinkage, then they shouldn't have had him try it on in court. The visual (coupled with the rhyme) is a more powerful influence on the jury than an executive's testimony. I remember experts discussing the glove thing after it happened, saying that you should never ask a question of a witness unless you already know the answer and it works in your favor. I suppose it's possible that if the prosecution hadn't mentioned the glove, then the defense would have anyway, knowing that it didn't fit. But then they'd have to admit that a bloody glove was found in his car. Quote
Kornfed Posted August 17, 2023 Posted August 17, 2023 I wonder if the LA riots (see Rodney King) had anything to do with the acquittal. ...Duh.... The guy was my idol as a kid. Great runner. .... F--- him! Quote
Mr. WEO Posted August 17, 2023 Posted August 17, 2023 (edited) OJ was a piker compared to this guy: Edited August 17, 2023 by Mr. WEO 1 Quote
mannc Posted August 17, 2023 Posted August 17, 2023 2 hours ago, julian said: 2000+ yards in 14 games in an era where defenses were built to stop the run. its absolutely ridiculous. I believe the Bills as a team passed for less than 1000 yards that year. Think about that... 1 Quote
4th&long Posted August 17, 2023 Posted August 17, 2023 What he did later in life negates what he did on the field. I hope his name does not go on the wall in the new stadium. 4 1 Quote
mannc Posted August 17, 2023 Posted August 17, 2023 11 hours ago, Chandler#81 said: He put Buffalo on the global sports front page. Despite the horrific crime he likely committed much later in life, he was absolutely MUST SEE tv! Here’s a great video compilation of his Buffalo Bill on field exploits. And because the Bills of that era had the worst coaches in the history of professional football, OJ didn't really even get started until his fourth year in the league. He would have been an incredible WR in todays game... Quote
Simon Posted August 17, 2023 Posted August 17, 2023 Damn, Reggie McKenzie was one hell of a ballplayer, wasn't he 2 1 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.