Super Excited For This Draft Class

[Don Otreply]

2 hours ago, eball said:

I think we are very quickly going to see that Diggs/Davis/Knox/Kincaid/Cook is the best offense we can put out on the field, and a pretty effing fantastic one.

 

Yup, that and with a couple of guys to step in as needed as backups, (Sherfield, Harty & Shakir) plus  our potential / developmental pass catchers,  I think we are in notably better shape than last season with our receiver / pass catcher group. 

[NewEra]

14 minutes ago, Freddie's Dead said:

 

Bruce Smith says hi. 

not sure if you’re talking about his draft class being the best or Bruce being my favorite draft pick ever

 

I think Josh will get us a Lombardi-  one Lombardi and a HoFer trumps 2 HoFers and No lombardi imo.  

I was 11 when bruce was drafted.   I didn’t know anything about him so he wasn’t my favorite draft pick ever.  
 

I’ve been studying draft prospects since 2007, Kincaid is the draft pick I’ve been most excited about based on what I’ve seen.  Prior to Kincaid, Sammy Watkins was that guy for me.  Shows how much I know

 

 

 

[gordong]

6 hours ago, Dr.Sack said:

Subpar drafts are the main reasons why we haven’t won it all yet. Drafting and retaining on the roster is a huge factor in continued success.

 

2019 Oliver & Knox (2/8). 

2020 Epenesa, Davis, Bass, Jackson (4/7). 

2021 Rousseau, Basham, Brown, Doyle, Hamlin (5/8).

2022 Elam, Cook, Bernard, Shakir, Benford, Spector (6/8). 
17/31 draft picks remain on the team.

 

2019 KC (1/6)

2020 KC (5/6)

2021 KC (6/6)

2022 KC (10/10)

Total 22/28

 

KC has been more efficient at drafting especially considering their disastrous 2019 draft class. It’s no wonder why they have stayed at the top of the AFC and have hosted the AFC Championship 5 consecutive seasons.

 

In order for the Bills to catch-up they must hit on a higher % of their draft class.

the percent mean a lot less than the quality of the payers you do hit on...  

2020 Epenesa is a total miss as far as Im concerned. the last three are good to great picks... Hoping Davis reaches great status (if we want to win a SB this is a main must have this year)

Rousseau is the only guy from 2021 that's done much...maybe can add Hamlin seeing as he was a late round pick.

Same with 2022 nothing much so far. BUT Cook, Benford and Elam still have a chance to shine.

2023 the first picks have a great chance to be great. 

 

[Doc]

Put WIlliams at MLB and let Milano make the calls if need be.

[maddenboy]

4 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

. . . I would be shocked if, health permitting, the Bills are not at 60%+ 12 personnel by the middle of 2024 at the latest. They could even get there this year if Saturday was an indicator of anything (that remains to be seen).

 

EDIT: I tried to find the Pats personnel groupings in 2011 when they had Gronk and Hernandez but it appears to be before the majority of the analytics sites were tracking it. . . .  talks about the Pats being "predominantly" a 2TE offense I suspect it was way up there.

I recall a piece on . . . ESPN or NFL films, including snippets from Belichick, where basically Belichick and his evil genius Ernie-whatever sat around and said "what is the weakest position group, overall, in the NFL?

 

answer:  safety.

 

Question:  how can we exploit that fully?  what can we do that other teams are not?  (and this is why we love versatile players)

 

Answer:  (after some time in the think-tank):  2 tight ends, both of whom can stretch the seams.

 

---

 

So i'm wondering as a non "X and O" fan, whether

 

1)  will we really be 12, or is Kincaid going to flex so much that we functionally are 11 with a big slot?

 

2)  Is there some objective reason why McBeane might have identified (like weak nickel corners in our division or some such) to seek to do this, rather than "well, Kincaid fell to us, so now lets figure out how to use him.

[GunnerBill]

1 minute ago, maddenboy said:

I recall a piece on . . . ESPN or NFL films, including snippets from Belichick, where basically Belichick and his evil genius Ernie-whatever sat around and said "what is the weakest position group, overall, in the NFL?

 

answer:  safety.

 

Question:  how can we exploit that fully?  what can we do that other teams are not?  (and this is why we love versatile players)

 

Answer:  (after some time in the think-tank):  2 tight ends, both of whom can stretch the seams.

 

---

 

So i'm wondering as a non "X and O" fan, whether

 

1)  will we really be 12, or is Kincaid going to flex so much that we functionally are 11 with a big slot?

 

2)  Is there some objective reason why McBeane might have identified (like weak nickel corners in our division or some such) to seek to do this, rather than "well, Kincaid fell to us, so now lets figure out how to use him.

 

I think functionally we will be more 11 with a big slot. I don't think Kincaid is gonna be a true "flex" tight end in the way that Hernandez was for the Pats - lining up in the slot, the backfield, as an H-back... I think he is going to run mainly from the slot, the odd snap in line and the odd snap split wide - or even as we saw Sat him line up wide and then shift into the slot or vice versa. 

 

[HappyDays]

3 hours ago, BillsFanForever19 said:

What makes you say Shorter isn't an NFL WR?

 

He wasn't able to separate against the Colts backups. I also went back and watched his special teams snaps, to me he looks lumbering as a gunner and not especially competitive. Special teams was his best path to the roster IMO. The only reason his roster spot is still hanging on by a thread is because he was a 5th round pick this year. But I think this year even that won't matter as much as it did in previous years. At that point in the draft Beane was trading down as much as possible, it appeared to me that his draftable grade board was already wiped out by the time they took Shorter.

 

There's a prevailing belief on this board that later day three picks are going to get a lot of time to prove themselves. The reality is that the depth of this roster is about as competitive as it gets, so you either show something to build on or you're gone.

[GunnerBill]

27 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

 

He wasn't able to separate against the Colts backups. I also went back and watched his special teams snaps, to me he looks lumbering as a gunner and not especially competitive. Special teams was his best path to the roster IMO. The only reason his roster spot is still hanging on by a thread is because he was a 5th round pick this year. But I think this year even that won't matter as much as it did in previous years. At that point in the draft Beane was trading down as much as possible, it appeared to me that his draftable grade board was already wiped out by the time they took Shorter.

 

There's a prevailing belief on this board that later day three picks are going to get a lot of time to prove themselves. The reality is that the depth of this roster is about as competitive as it gets, so you either show something to build on or you're gone.

 

Definitely possible there board was wiped out by the time they took Shorter. I think more likely he was on their board (they did have him in for a visit so I think they did genuinely like him) but he was graded later than the 5th. They traded down once, I suspect nobody was offering anything to go down again so it was like "hey we got a 6th/7th on this big guy, he can play teams, we have a spot available on the roster for a 6th receiver, let's take a shot". By the time they took the last two guys - Broekers and Austin I think the board was definitely wiped out and they were taking their favourite PFA targets. 

[Saint Douggie]

Some good info in this thread.

 

I'm excited about the potential for this team to run base 12 personnel with the pieces they have now

I think it makes the offense unique and gives Josh & Dorsey more of a variety of options in ways to attack defenses

 

I'm excited for how 12 personnel could help their running game (with some nice depth at RB) 

 

I consider myself a very objective fan (not a homer) and honestly feel that this year's team will statistically field the best offense that we've had since Josh was drafted (barring injuries)

 

From some of the tweets during camp, it looked like Dorsey was using a lot of motion, and moving guys like Harty & Knox into the backfield, Cook out wide, etc. - that's what I'm most looking forward to seeing this season.

Edited August 15, 2023 by Saint Douggie

[ngbills]

We say this every year around this time.

[Doc]

1 hour ago, HappyDays said:

He wasn't able to separate against the Colts backups. I also went back and watched his special teams snaps, to me he looks lumbering as a gunner and not especially competitive. Special teams was his best path to the roster IMO. The only reason his roster spot is still hanging on by a thread is because he was a 5th round pick this year. But I think this year even that won't matter as much as it did in previous years. At that point in the draft Beane was trading down as much as possible, it appeared to me that his draftable grade board was already wiped out by the time they took Shorter.

 

There's a prevailing belief on this board that later day three picks are going to get a lot of time to prove themselves. The reality is that the depth of this roster is about as competitive as it gets, so you either show something to build on or you're gone.

 

He can easily be put on the PS.

 

[Florida Bills Fanatic]

5 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

I have tried to find an example of a size and speed receiver who was highly recruited out of HS, didn't produce in college and then went on to out produce that in the pros. It's like a needle in a haystack. I am not writing him off but that makes me sceptical he is going to make a significant contribution. 

I agree with you.  A friend of mine that works in the NFL told me that this guy had terrible position coaching in college.  He also said that this happens more than fans realize but regional scouts are good at seeing the talent and they know who the poor position coaches are.  He also said it may take this kid a year to catch up but he has the physical and mental ability to do it.  I got the distinct impression that Shorter had been on the radar of my friend's team.

[Special K]

I think Torrence is going to be one of those Offensive Lineman that get plugged into the starting lineup as a rookie, then the next thing you know, a decade has passed and he is still in the starting lineup. 

 

I expect him to have a very solid career with the Bills.

[Motorin']

8 hours ago, BullBuchanan said:

As far as i know, that's not really a thing that any team does long term. Most years, the top 12 personnel team runs it around 30% of their plays, in 2021 Miami was an outlier at 61% and in 2019 the eagles ran it 52%. Neither one of those teams were very good either. That aside, it still means that a big weapon for your team is off the field on 40-50% of offensive snaps.

 

7 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

I think this team IS going to do that long term. The reason the Dolphins did it so much in 2021 was the exact reason the Bills will end up there by, at latest, the middle of next year. And the Eagles the same in 2019. They had Mike Gesicki and Zach Ertz respectively who were among their top 3 pass catchers but who are tight ends in name only. The Bills are going to in that bracket with Kincaid and he has the talent to be way better than Gesicki and I personally believe a little better than Ertz too. The Ravens in 2019 used either 12 or 21 (and in Roman's system there is a considerable cross over between the two) 60%+ as well. 

 

It happens rarely because situations where a team has a Dawson Knox and a Dalton Kincaid are rare. There are not many teams in football that could honestly say "two of our top four receivers are tight ends." I would be shocked if, health permitting, the Bills are not at 60%+ 12 personnel by the middle of 2024 at the latest. They could even get there this year if Saturday was an indicator of anything (that remains to be seen).

 

EDIT: I tried to find the Pats personnel groupings in 2011 when they had Gronk and Hernandez but it appears to be before the majority of the analytics sites were tracking it. However, just looking at usage and targets and some of the media coverage that talks about the Pats being "predominantly" a 2TE offense I suspect it was way up there. Again to me the reality is it is just rare that a team genuinely has two tight ends who are better receivers than their third wide receiver. But if Kincaid is anything like what we think he can be the Bills will definitely be one of those teams.

 

I totally agree with Gunner, and it's bc I think Kincaid is going to be used more as a big slot wr than a true #2 inline TE. 

 

I don't see Harty or Shakir being high volume targets at this point. Maybe they're 30 catch guys at best? 

 

If Kincaid can handle 70-80 targets, which I think he can, he's in the running to become the #2 receiver on the team. At least by next year. 

 

I see 50-60 targets this year. Maybe on par with Knox. Without asking Kincaid to stay in to pass block. 

 

[Doc]

9 minutes ago, Special K said:

I think Torrence is going to be one of those Offensive Lineman that get plugged into the starting lineup as a rookie, then the next thing you know, a decade has passed and he is still in the starting lineup. 

 

I expect him to have a very solid career with the Bills.

 

The problem is Josh's contract eats up a lot of cap space and you can only pay so many top players.

[Robert Paulson]

9 hours ago, BullBuchanan said:

If the guard turns out to be good, that's cool. That doesn't put games in the win column from my seat.

 but sh!tty guard play puts games in the Loss column-see last year

[SCBills]

The thing I can appreciate about this draft class is that we finally look to have brought in some immediate high impact players.  

 

Dorian Williams may take some time because his easily translatable position is occupied by Milano and we decided not to put him into the MLB competition because, reasons, but Torrence and Kincaid... if they live up to their potential (best pass catcher in the draft / best guard in the draft) we're finally adding some desperately needed young high end talent that can give us cheap & immediate impact. 

 

I think by the end of their second years, we could have high end play from our Top 3 picks.. they all look the part.  

 

As for Shorter, Austin and Broeker... meh.  Not sure I see a late round gem there like in past years - maybe Shorter if he can put it together. 

 

We needed to hit on early picks that can contribute early on in their rookie contracts, and I do think we may have finally done that.  

 

Edited August 15, 2023 by SCBills

[FilthyBeast]

It's hard to be too excited for this draft given Beane's spotty history outside of 2018/JA17 and you really need at least 2 full seasons to fully understand what we have as a whole.

 

But if they hit on both Kincaid and Torrance in terms of not only being legit NFL starters, but possible probowl/star players it goes a long way to keeping this team relevant in the next few years. Torrance in particular would certainly undo both the Wyatt Teller mistake and passing on Creed Humprhey and he has looked the part so far.

[LOVEMESOMEBILLS]

10 hours ago, GreggTX said:

This may go down as Beane's best draft to date -- A pretty tall order since he nabbed Josh and Edmunds together. But Edmunds is gone. Meanwhile the UDFA's look like 2 or 3 of them are sure to make the PS or better. Certainly, Shavers will stick somewhere. While the day 3 guys haven't shown much, it's still early -- At least for our 5th rounder. Meanwhile, the top 3 picks look like solid gold. To say that Kincaid and Torrence have shined is an understatement. They are everything we hoped for and then some. I know it's too early, but everything they have done to this point has been outstanding. Don't let me stop there either. I was disappointed when they drafted Dorian Williams. Not any more! He looks great too and was possibly the best defensive player on the field last Saturday. I wonder how long it will be before he forces the coaches to find a way to keep him on the field. Maybe add a little bulk and let him play besides Milano.

 

I'd love to hear your thoughts on our rookie class.

 

 While I have high expectations for this class, especially Kincaid & Torrence, there's virtually no chance this goes down as Beane best draft.

 

 2018 will probably go down as Beane’s top draft of his career. First he drafts Allen(1st round- 7th overall) and Edmunds(1st round- 16th) in the 1st round. Allen has not only turned into a franchise player(At the most important position)that everyone was hoping for, but he's also turned into one of the top 2 or 3 QBs in the league. Edmunds we got 5 years of solid starting play at another really important position. Though he left for more money, we should receive a 3rd round comp pick. 

 

Add to those 2 players:

 

 Harrison Phillips(3rd round-96th) 

 

 Tauron Johnson(4th round-121st)

 

 Siran Neal(5th round-154th)

 

 Wyatt Teller(5th round-166th) 

 

 Ray Ray McCloud(6th round-187th).

 

 

Edited August 15, 2023 by LOVEMESOMEBILLS

[BADOLBILZ]

1 hour ago, ngbills said:

We say this every year around this time.

 

 

Yeah to put it in perspective........last year at this time Shakir was having an excellent preseason and was a virtual lock to make the team........Bernard had just picked up a fumble and taken it to the house so there was optimism there.......fans were delighted that Benford was looking like a real steal...........Elam and Cook were still on their honeymoon with fans.

 

Torrence and Williams flashed in the preseason game but their camp reports have been less glowing.     The Kincaid hype seems to be very warranted though.  

 

Overall this class has lacked the volume of prospects that the 2022 class had..........but I do think the top 3 picks have more long term impact potential than the top 3 picks last season did.    

 

Beane kinda' botched day 1 and day 2 of a pretty deep draft class in 2022, IMO.

 

All you gotta' do is look at the potential of Dorian Williams versus Bernard.   Coming away with Bernard at about the same spot in a better draft was not good.