Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, Rich Stadium Original said:

Purely a gut feeling..will have to go back and look at the stats again, but..

Thought Cook looked good..even aside from the TD hit the holes well in his limited action.

Vance more than held his own at guard.

Allen has two weeks to get in sync if he wants to be QB2

Looks like they are pretty confident in THAT rookie TE if they hardly played him

Unimpressed with starting defensive line. Weak again against the run, and only pass rush was generated by blitzing. 

 

 

We was also missing three really good players on the defensive line. Let's see how it looks with Jones and Philips in the rotation. Next week possibly.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Einstein said:

Posted this in the game day thread as well, but Cook already has me excited for this season.

 

His vision to bounce runs outside is something we have missed for many years when Singletary was the running back.

 

I have no doubt that Singletary plows into the line rather than bouncing it outside for the TD on this play:

 

 

Here is what Singletary frustratingly has done all too often:

 

 

 

 

Not to mention Zack Moss…

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)

Gimme a   T!  T!

Gimme an R!  R!

Gimme an A!  A!

Gimme an S!  S!

Gimme an H!  H!

 

Waddaya got?
 

KYLE ALLEN!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Chandler#81
  • Haha (+1) 6
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

See I don't think the backup line was a disaster. I think the Quarterback was a disaster.  The line looked mostly fine when Barkley was in. 

 

Kyle Allen was absolutely atrocious. Including holding the ball forever, staring down receivera and fidgety, skittish feet in the pocket. 

 

I thought there was some good from the backup linemen.... Edwards and Van Denmark in particular. I thought Ike Boettger really struggled on the 3rd unit. He doesn't look like the player he was pre ankle surgery. Equally I think Broeker had some nice moments.

 

Our 2nd team line was a hell of a lot better than Indy's.

 

The 3rd string OLine was pretty bad. Allen had no time that first series. He didnt play horribly. Barkley obviously looked awesome vs 3rd stringers and seemed to have timing perfect.

 

Allen still has work to do but i would say solid. Colts had their starters out ther longer than us so he played a lot with our backups and their starters. And he had to deal with some pretty bad crucial drops from Shakir and Morris that would have extended drives.

  • Disagree 3
Posted (edited)
47 minutes ago, klos63 said:

Barkely did well in the 4th qtr of game 1 preseason, against many players that probably won't be in the league in 3 weeks.


I didn’t know Barkley was playing with the first team offense. Thanks for the heads up.

47 minutes ago, klos63 said:
Edited by Beast
Posted
35 minutes ago, Success said:

 

He was good, regardless of the circumstances.  I'd feel better w/ him as QB2 right now.

 

Barkley has close to 10 years in the league, so he should look good against 3rd/4th stringers.  Kyle Allen is learning a new offense and was playing against Colts’ starters.  That’s not meant to make excuses for Kyle Allen, it is just a fact.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
7 minutes ago, Kmart128 said:

 

The 3rd string OLine was pretty bad. Allen had no time that first series. He didnt play horribly. Barkley obviously looked awesome vs 3rd stringers and seemed to have timing perfect.

 

Allen still has work to do but i would say solid. Colts had their starters out ther longer than us so he played a lot with our backups and their starters. And he had to deal with some pretty bad crucial drops from Shakir and Morris that would have extended drives.

 

He was awful.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

Some thoughts on the game. 
 

Regarding running backs:

I’ve said since they got him that Harris would be a lateral move from Motor at best, but likely a downgrade- the biggest issue being durability. Of course, Harris is out because he’s dinged up already. Mimms should get quite a few more looks before the cut down. 

 

I said during the game: Murray’s the sort of downhill power back we haven’t had in a long time. Glad he’s here. 
 

can Evans be K/PR?

Regarding wide receivers:

Shavers > Shorter, inconsistency notwithstanding. 


Would have liked to have seen more of Harry and Isabella as WRs. Neither seemed too inspiring as K/PR. 
 

Like everyone else, I want to believe in Shakir. And honestly, I think he’s going to pull it together. He has big play ability. 
 

Regarding O-line:

I’m nowhere near as concerned with the O-line depth as many one here. It’s not as if the entire first unit’s going to go down to be replaced by the #2s. And the first unit looked pretty good to me. Certainly upgraded from last season. 
 

Regarding the D-line:

Dang, that’s a deep unit!

 

Poona Ford has the thighs of a Rhinoceros. 
 

I don’t know that Ed Oliver is going to have the “break out year” many think he’s going to have. 
 

Boogie is one of the more underrated players on the team. He is a bit slow for his position, but he makes plays. That being said, (as many others believe), I think he might be a smart trade candidate. 

 

Regarding the secondary:

When do we get to stop talking about the heroic return of Damar Hamlin?

  • Agree 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, Kmart128 said:

 

The 3rd string OLine was pretty bad. Allen had no time that first series. He didnt play horribly. Barkley obviously looked awesome vs 3rd stringers and seemed to have timing perfect.

 

Allen still has work to do but i would say solid. Colts had their starters out ther longer than us so he played a lot with our backups and their starters. And he had to deal with some pretty bad crucial drops from Shakir and Morris that would have extended drives.

This is being pretty nitpicky wouldn’t you say? It would be more of a story if they played well-there’s a reason why they are so low in the depth chart 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
25 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

Kyle Allen was absolutely atrocious. Including holding the ball forever, staring down receivera and fidgety, skittish feet in the pocket. 

 

Kyle Allen is so bad that it makes me upset that we didn’t pursue a better backup option. Maybe there was literally no one else available? I haven’t checked.

 

Absolutely anyone has to be better than what he has shown throughout camp and in this game.

 

If Allen goes down for ANY amount of time - even one game - I find little optimism for a route for us to produce a win.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, Chandler#81 said:

Gimme a   T!  T!

Gimme an R!  R!

Gimme a   A!  A!

Gimme an S!  S!

Gimme an H!  H!

 

Waddaya gor? 
 

KYLE ALLEN!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


It wasn’t aired anywhere down here so listened to a bit in the 2nd half on Sirius.  Kyle Allen sounded terrible from what you guys are telling me.

 

I honestly don’t have a problem with Barkley as our primary backup.  We’ve been fortunate in the past with Trubisky and so on.  
 

I know it’s always possible, but Allen has been incredibly durable.  I know he was out for a few games in 2018, but he really has improved escaping, and even sliding more.  After today, my guess is McBeane are sitting him down and telling him no mistakes moving forward.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Einstein said:

 

Kyle Allen is so bad that it makes me upset that we didn’t pursue a better backup option. Maybe there was literally no one else available? I haven’t checked.

 

Absolutely anyone has to be better than what he has shown throughout camp and in this game.

 

If Allen goes down for ANY amount of time - even one game - I find little optimism for a route for us to produce a win.

Kyle Allen played well in the league in the past and was one of the better backup QB options. Barkley looks like the better option at this point

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, Rocky Landing said:

 

 

Regarding the secondary:

When do we get to stop talking about the heroic return of Damar Hamlin?

Wow-gif.gif?fit=450,250&ssl=1

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, Ya Digg? said:

This is being pretty nitpicky wouldn’t you say? It would be more of a story if they played well-there’s a reason why they are so low in the depth chart 

Yeah but thats why I think Kyle Allen looked so bad that first drive out of the half.

24 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

He was awful.

 

He was on pace for 16-30 244 Yards for a full game... not great but considering he was playing with backups and Colts had their starters in longer. And he is learning a new offense. Id hardly say awful... bot great by anymeans but ive seen way way worse performances. Especially in preseason. Heck ive seen worse performances out of Barkley in the past

  • Disagree 2
Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, machine gun kelly said:


It wasn’t aired anywhere down here so listened to a bit in the 2nd half on Sirius.  Kyle Allen sounded terrible from what you guys are telling me.

 

I honestly don’t have a problem with Barkley as our primary backup.  We’ve been fortunate in the past with Trubisky and so on.  
 

I know it’s always possible, but Allen has been incredibly durable.  I know he was out for a few games in 2018, but he really has improved escaping, and even sliding more.  After today, my guess is McBeane are sitting him down and telling him no mistakes moving forward.

Watched the game live at my Son’s home on Firestick (Unlimited Tv) Buffalo feed. Convinced me to purchase it @ $35/month. We live in Jacksonville Florida.

Edited by Chandler#81
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
1 hour ago, ScottLaw said:

I worry the opposite with that Jets defensive line against ours, but yea, our line should be able to pressure that Jets line. 

Difference is we have Josh and they have 40 year old Rogers.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...