Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, KDIGGZ said:

This "competition" was never much of a competition to begin with. They had Dodson, who is a career backup but knows the defense, and they had Bernard, who is the size of a safety. They never even made an attempt to replace Edmunds and I think it will come back to bite them in the you know what. The MLB is a very important piece in this defense. It's the Luke Kuechly position. You can't just stick a backup in there and call it a day

 

 

We better hope the DL is lights out this season

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, KDIGGZ said:

This "competition" was never much of a competition to begin with. They had Dodson, who is a career backup but knows the defense, and they had Bernard, who is the size of a safety. They never even made an attempt to replace Edmunds and I think it will come back to bite them in the you know what. The MLB is a very important piece in this defense. It's the Luke Kuechly position. You can't just stick a backup in there and call it a day

Our HC is a defensive guy, and also our DC. He's known and proven to value the defense over offense and to pour a **** ton of resources into that side of the ball. If the MLB spot was that important in his defense we would have brought in a new MLB. 

 

We will be fine without Edmunds. We are stacked everywhere else on D. It would have been disappointing to see them go for a high end replacement. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Einstein said:

 

But some perspective.

 

Our defense averages 16.7 ppg last season when Dodson did not start.

 

Dodson started against Goff and gave up 25. 


Dodson started against Brissett and gave up 23.

 

The only game our defense (with Dodson) didn’t do worse than our average was against Pittsburgh with them starting their rookie QB for the first time ever.

 

The Lions were #5 in the NFL in scoring.  

 

They are currently 9th in Vegas odds to win the Super Bowl just because of their offense.  

 

No team can hover around their average the entire year.  There are ups and downs.

 

Posted
11 minutes ago, Bleeding Bills Blue said:

And yet he soldiered on and led the team in tackles 🙂 

 

Their top 10 running game managed 51 yards on 19 carries.  If you want to add in the QB scrambles you have 26 carries for 80 yards.  

 

Half of his tackles were on plays that resulted in 1st-Downs.  Just sayin'.   

 

If we're going to analyze, let's look at the entire picture.  

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Buffalo Boy said:

 

Because teams never over pay for talent and it never blows up in their face 🤔

 

54 minutes ago, Drew21PA said:

Overpaid by the bears

 

Not to mention the fact that the Bears traded Roquan Smith, because they didn’t want to pay him, then overpaid a lesser talent in Edmunds to play the same position.

 

Edmunds getting a massive contract from the Bears says more about the Bears stupidity than the talent level of Edmunds, IMO.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Disagree 1
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, That's No Moon said:

They could. 

 

For example. Neither Sam Mills, nor Terrell Dodson, have ever been in my kitchen.

 

LOL  

 

$22,000 gone in Final Jeopardy!!   

 

Good one!  

 

Love the humor here!! 

 

 

5 minutes ago, Process said:

Our HC is a defensive guy, and also our DC. He's known and proven to value the defense over offense and to pour a **** ton of resources into that side of the ball. If the MLB spot was that important in his defense we would have brought in a new MLB. 

 

We will be fine without Edmunds. We are stacked everywhere else on D. It would have been disappointing to see them go for a high end replacement. 

 

That is the rose-colored glasses narrative alright.  

 

We'll see how it all shakes out.  

 

:)  

 

 

Edited by PBF81
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, Process said:

Our HC is a defensive guy, and also our DC. He's known and proven to value the defense over offense and to pour a **** ton of resources into that side of the ball. If the MLB spot was that important in his defense we would have brought in a new MLB. 

 

We will be fine without Edmunds. We are stacked everywhere else on D. It would have been disappointing to see them go for a high end replacement. 


If you don’t believe that the only reason the Bills didn’t sign Edmunds is because they didn’t have the cap space you are fooling yourself.

 

You’re about to see how much Edmunds meant to this defense when teams can start passing the ball consistently over the middle on this team. Edmunds was a menace to offenses in the pass game. Like having Rodan playing in the middle.

Edited by Beast
  • Eyeroll 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, KDIGGZ said:

This "competition" was never much of a competition to begin with. They had Dodson, who is a career backup but knows the defense, and they had Bernard, who is the size of a safety. They never even made an attempt to replace Edmunds and I think it will come back to bite them in the you know what. The MLB is a very important piece in this defense. It's the Luke Kuechly position. You can't just stick a backup in there and call it a day

 

I think the Bills did attempt to replace Edmunds, but came up short on those they pursued. I agree that it will negatively impact the defense if they can’t find someone to adequately replace him. I am intrigued by what a dime package with Rapp replacing the MLB will look like, but I do not think that’ll be an adequate regular defense.

 

It’ll be interesting to see what McDermott can do with what he has to work with. IMO too many times the answer to issues on the defense was using a premium draft pick or dropping. big money on a FA. That’s just not sustainable if you want to maintain a quality offense. Time for McDermott to show what he can do as a DC. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Special K said:

Not to mention the fact that the Bears traded Roquan Smith, because they didn’t want to pay him, then overpaid a lesser talent in Edmunds to play the same position.

 

Edmunds getting a massive contract from the Bears says more about the Bears stupidity than the talent level of Edmunds, IMO.

 

One could also argue that they let Smith go for more money because they thought that Edmunds could do the same or better, or that perhaps his skillset offered something that Smith's didn't.  

 

I'm not arguing one way or the other there, except to say that IMO (as in opinion, and therefore TBD) is that Edmunds at 25 will be a whole lot better than he has been, in the same role that Smith's been in over there in Chicago, and out of the role he's been in here.  

 

I do find it amusing that McD's an expert and "knows what he's doing and is there for a reason," while their coaches, Eberflus and their Defensive Coordinator Williams (also from William & Mary BTW) don't know what they're doing and don't deserve to be there and aren't the same "experts" that our coaching staff is.  LOL  

 

 

1 hour ago, Beast said:

If you don’t believe that the only reason the Bills didn’t sign Edmunds is because they didn’t have the cap space you are fooling yourself.

 

You’re about to see how much Edmunds meant to this defense when teams can start passing the ball consistently over the middle on this team. Edmunds was a menace to offenses in the pass game. Like having Rodan playing in the middle.

 

What will be interesting is how the narratives here will change if that in fact turns out to be the case.  

 

 

Edited by PBF81
  • Agree 1
Posted
29 minutes ago, PBF81 said:

 

Half of his tackles were on plays that resulted in 1st-Downs.  Just sayin'.   

 

If we're going to analyze, let's look at the entire picture.  

 

 

 

He did have a stop on one of the back to back brissett QB runs on 3rd and 1.  Pretty much ended the game right there.  

Posted
2 hours ago, KDIGGZ said:

This "competition" was never much of a competition to begin with. They had Dodson, who is a career backup but knows the defense, and they had Bernard, who is the size of a safety. They never even made an attempt to replace Edmunds and I think it will come back to bite them in the you know what. The MLB is a very important piece in this defense. It's the Luke Kuechly position. You can't just stick a backup in there and call it a day

Well we were 4-0 with Dodson starting,  where he practiced all year as the backup so very possible he ups his game.  Like ppl said, the positional value is low , especially on an elite roster, Edmunds never made sense to sign for that $ 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, BarleyNY said:

 

I think the Bills did attempt to replace Edmunds, but came up short on those they pursued. I agree that it will negatively impact the defense if they can’t find someone to adequately replace him. I am intrigued by what a dime package with Rapp replacing the MLB will look like, but I do not think that’ll be an adequate regular defense.

 

It’ll be interesting to see what McDermott can do with what he has to work with. IMO too many times the answer to issues on the defense was using a premium draft pick or dropping. big money on a FA. That’s just not sustainable if you want to maintain a quality offense. Time for McDermott to show what he can do as a DC. 

 

 

They drafted a TE and a guard seeing that... they needed better hands and another weapon, and just trying to build a strong offensive line requires draft resources or a ton of money.  I was hoping one of Sanders or Simpson might slip to us in the 3rd, and it didn't happen.  Not gonna judge a rookie based on his first camp - bernard on the other hand is a year plus in and still doesn't seem capable of playing at the speed needed to be successful.  

 

I do think Dodson/Rapp/Milano/Johnson are all going to be blitzing a bit more than they have in the past - hopefully dodson can prove more valuable in this role than edmunds.  

 

  • Agree 1
Posted
2 hours ago, oldmanfan said:

And what would your answer be?  Bring in a guy with no experience in McD’s defense, whether rookie or vet? ?  Or stick with a veteran who knows the system as has performed fairly well within it?

 

When are fans going to get it through their heads that there is a salary cap in the NFL and because of that you are not going to have All Pros at every spot on the field?  If one were to listen to the hysteria this past off season we should have brought high priced guys in at MLB, WR2, RT.  That is not the way the NFL works.

Anybody left in Carolina?

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted

Let’s not completely write off Dodson. He’s not Brandon Spikes out there, the kid is a good athlete. Is he a limited athlete? Sure, but the team has stuck with him for 4 years so far. He doesn’t need to be an elite LB, just a 1-2, year place holder.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 2
Posted
1 hour ago, oldmanfan said:

So the MLB is now solely responsible for the performance of the defense?  Once again your user name belies your knowledge base.

It was pretty lazy analysis, one would think a physics genius would account for the other rather obvious variables 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted

Bernard was a head scratcher when Beane made the pick. It's looking like it was a bad selection which compounded even more by the Williams pick this year. Two years to plan and draft a future successor for Edmunds has not played out and highly likely we will need to address yet AGAIN in next year’s draft.  These are critical misses when you try to address the same position but miss as it creates a domino to upgrade talent in other key areas. Similar to drafting Singletary, followed by Moss, followed by Cook at RB And then again with AJE, Groot and Basham but then having to add FA’s due to the misses.

 

I love Beane but this has been a trend and with certain positions I think it’s far criticism that the scouting team evaluations need to be questioned. I realize you can’t hit on every pick but you can’t continue to have these types of misses in the early rounds. 

 

I’m hoping we add a LB from roster cut downs or thru a player trade. We better hope Milano stays healthy!
 


 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Eyeroll 1
  • Agree 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted (edited)

Dorian Williams is clearly the future MLB for this team. I get he’s listed at 230, but he looks the part of a modern NFL MLB. 
 

I could be wrong, but I could’ve sworn Beane admitted they drafted Bernard because they didn’t think they’d have Milano long term. I might be wrong. 

Edited by TheyCallMeAndy
Posted
9 minutes ago, Don Otreply said:

It was pretty lazy analysis, one would think a physics genius would account for the other rather obvious variables 

 

image.png.510214326739290d564fdd0a64c650c3.png

 

It's all in the math.  Edmunds = Milano x (CJ Mosley squared).

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...