Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
45 minutes ago, ScottLaw said:

And if he can’t it will be more of the same of Josh and Diggs doing everything while playing back yard football 

I remember these posts last August…

But you're so negative. Get your reality out of here.

 

I think Kincaid improves this team. No doubt about it. Is it enough? I don't know. I see no reason to think a team won't put a LB and Safety on him. Diggs can be covered 1x1 in most cases because our OL is poor. 

 

We need a legit #2 WR and/or OL to improve to make the difference.

 

Kincaid alone won't be able to do it unless he has a historic season. That'd require an entire change in philosophy & Dorsey succeeding with 2TE sets 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Disagree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, boyst said:

But you're so negative. Get your reality out of here.

 

I think Kincaid improves this team. No doubt about it. Is it enough? I don't know. I see no reason to think a team won't put a LB and Safety on him. Diggs can be covered 1x1 in most cases because our OL is poor. 

 

We need a legit #2 WR and/or OL to improve to make the difference.

 

Kincaid alone won't be able to do it unless he has a historic season. That'd require an entire change in philosophy & Dorsey succeeding with 2TE sets 

Look at what Dorsey had  for talent at TE #2/slot  last season, it was dreadful. Kincaid is significantly better and because of that he should improve the offense as most have said. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, The Jokeman said:

Look at what Dorsey had  for talent at TE #2/slot  last season, it was dreadful. Kincaid is significantly better and because of that he should improve the offense as most have said. 

Until it's on the field and proven I don't buy it. McKenzie nearly doubled all stats of harry and Sherfield 

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, boyst said:

Until it's on the field and proven I don't buy it. McKenzie nearly doubled all stats of harry and Sherfield 

Harty missed 3/4th of the season. 

Edited by The Jokeman
Posted

If used correctly he is a 70 catch 800 yard guy as a rookie. Remember he is not a TE, he is a slot receiver. That is still 20 or so less receptions than Beasley had in this offense in one less game. If he only has 40 catches for 500 yards then they have a problem. 

 

Diggs should be around 105 receptions.

Then I think Davis goes for 65 receptions and at 16 YPC that puts him just over 1000 yards. 

 

That's 240 receptions of the 350-380 completions Josh will throw. The remaining 120ish receptions will be spread around to the other guys. Knox probably makes 40 or 50 of those. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Shaw66 said:

I've said before that if Kincaid can make some plays early in the season, the threat of him will be enough.   He and Knox will force the defense to be stout in the passing game up the middle, which should create opportunities for the wideouts, and for Cook in the flats.  So, I think Kincaid could prove more important than what is reflected in his yardage.  

I can agree to that too

 

they have to start out really strong

 

my opinion is that the first 8 games in the season are all winnable and should reflect that heading into cincinatti 

 

so start strong as you indicated 

Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, The Jokeman said:

Harty missed 3/4th of the season. 

Career wise 

 

And regardless injury takes away value. 

Edited by boyst
Posted
2 hours ago, Augie said:

The BIGGEST question mark is still OLine, but we need legit options in the slot to have a well rounded offense. There is absolutely nothing wrong with a 7 yard completion that moves the chains. 

Bills were by far the best team in the regular season from outside the redzone.  Literally the best team in the NFL at moving the chains.  There is no real upside here.  The real question is can Kincaid/Harty make us more effective in the redzone.  If they can't, then the offense will still be excellent, but it won't be better than 2022. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Big Turk said:

 

Our offense averaged almost 400 yards a game last year, at over 397, 2nd only to KC.

 

The people who think there was some huge "dropoff" are not basing it on facts. 

 

There was no real dropoff, they may not have looked as pretty as they did earlier in the year but they still put up yards and points.

 

I could easily see them leading the NFL in offense this year and points scored. They probably have their most loaded offense of the Allen era overall.

 

 

Before the bye week:  441 Yards of offense per game (where I said they looked good, and McKenzie was effective in his role)

After: 371 Yards of offense per game

 

You are right - we average 397 yards of offense for the year - which was helped by a tremendous start and then hurt by a REAL drop-off of 70 yards a game.

 

Even breaking down just McKenzie:

 

First 6 weeks: 26 Tgts (4.5 per game), 3 TDs

Last 10 weeks: 39 Tgts (3.9 per game), 1 TD

 

That's with injuries piling up for other players as well.

 

If Kincaid can bring 3-4 catches on 5-6 targets, for 40ish yards and play a better blocking role then McKenzie, this team improves

  • Agree 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, ScottLaw said:

Yea I mean it is a lot to ask… which fans either 1) don’t see or 2) don’t want to see because it ruins their optimism for the season.

 

If all that fails and it shows early….I hope they realize it before the trade deadline and add a legit WR opposite Diggs whatever the cost… though I don’t trust Beane to pony up picks aggressively for an all in move at the deadline. 


 

 

my first thought is if we are failing at the trade deadline we obviously dont need Knox. we would have clearly overpaid for him. trade him for a WR.

  • Vomit 1
Posted
1 hour ago, ScottLaw said:

And if he can’t it will be more of the same of Josh and Diggs doing everything while playing back yard football 

I remember these posts last August…

To be fair, Crowder going down really hurt us last year.  Guy was never healthy and forced McKenzie into a role he couldnt handle

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Cray51 said:

Before the bye week:  441 Yards of offense per game (where I said they looked good, and McKenzie was effective in his role)

After: 371 Yards of offense per game

 

You are right - we average 397 yards of offense for the year - which was helped by a tremendous start and then hurt by a REAL drop-off of 70 yards a game.

 

Even breaking down just McKenzie:

 

First 6 weeks: 26 Tgts (4.5 per game), 3 TDs

Last 10 weeks: 39 Tgts (3.9 per game), 1 TD

 

That's with injuries piling up for other players as well.

 

If Kincaid can bring 3-4 catches on 5-6 targets, for 40ish yards and play a better blocking role then McKenzie, this team improves

Excellent post

Posted
1 hour ago, ScottLaw said:

And if he can’t it will be more of the same of Josh and Diggs doing everything while playing back yard football 

Josh's backyard football is plenty enough to get us to the 20.  Even in the playoffs. Inside the 20, some combination of better RBs, better play calling, more time for the QB, and receivers more receivers getting open is needed.  
 

Imagine the Eagles without the Rugby scrum last year, or the Chiefs without Reid scheming Kelce open every time the Chiefs get to the opponents 15 yard line.  

The Bills in the McDermott era have had no red zone persona, except when they were comfortable letting Josh run QB sweeps a few years back".  Otherwise, nothing to distinguish them.  Hence ranking 14th in RZ offense last year, despite having one of the best QBs in the NFL both passing and rushing. 

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Agree 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Chaos said:

Bills were by far the best team in the regular season from outside the redzone.  Literally the best team in the NFL at moving the chains.  There is no real upside here.  The real question is can Kincaid/Harty make us more effective in the redzone.  If they can't, then the offense will still be excellent, but it won't be better than 2022. 

Harris and Murray should also be factors in the redzone as both are bigger backs compared to Singletary/Cook and more accomplished than Moss. Toss in Sherfield/Shorter brings a little more size, Harty can play the McKenzie role as quick guy and seems like Dorsey making changes as reports of Harty in the backfield as well as TEs etc. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
44 minutes ago, ScottLaw said:

Agree… I’m not worried about regular season offense. They should manage. It’s come playoff time where I fear the weaknesses offensively will become more exposed. 

Revisionist history… McKenzie was front runner for slot even before Crowder injury… and also to be fair a Crowder injury was to be expected given his history.

It was a clearly stated roster battle going into camp last year.  Crowder got hurt (you could say it was expected, I would more say probable) at the beginning of camp, which put him on the back foot even going into preseason.  Where he then got hurt again before missing the entire regular season.

 

Simply having Crowder there may have allowed us to keep Mckenzie fresh and not force him into the role as consistently as he was in it.

Posted
1 hour ago, Chaos said:

Bills were by far the best team in the regular season from outside the redzone.  Literally the best team in the NFL at moving the chains.  There is no real upside here.  The real question is can Kincaid/Harty make us more effective in the redzone.  If they can't, then the offense will still be excellent, but it won't be better than 2022. 

 

The beginning of 2022? Or the end of 2022? The red zone is an issue for sure, but it’s not like we can ignore that it looked like we had a different offense at the end of the year after that amazing start. We can certainly be better than the way we finished last season. How much of that was the elbow injury and how much was other factors? We’ll probably never know. 

Posted
1 hour ago, boyst said:

my first thought is if we are failing at the trade deadline we obviously dont need Knox. we would have clearly overpaid for him. trade him for a WR.

Don't need Knox? You have no understanding of this offense or how they will use Kincaid. 

  • Agree 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Augie said:

The BIGGEST question mark is still OLine, but we need legit options in the slot to have a well rounded offense. There is absolutely nothing wrong with a 7 yard completion that moves the chains. 

Our oline could look worse.....

 

 

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...