Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Don Otreply said:

It’s the Cowboys, WGAF what anyone associated with them has to say? 
 

Josh Allen indeed lives rent free in their Psyche, they fear him. 

They’re still butthurt that the nation started to notice Allen in that game against the cowboys on thanksgiving. That 4th down play will forever live in their heads 

  • Like (+1) 8
  • Agree 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, BuffaloBillyG said:

CB depth is never a bad thing. At some point in my opinion Jackson, Benford and Elam will all make starts. Some due to injury and some due to matchup.

The odds that none of our top 2 CBs missing a down is absurdly low. If you're telling me we can rotate to keep fresh I am happy 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 2
Posted

 

 

Just now, Process said:

So Spector, Elam and Torrence getting first team reps today. Sweet.

 

To start with.

 

 

30 minutes ago, WhitewalkerInPhilly said:

You'd think they'd have more energy to spend on the Eagles considering that the reigning conference champs are in their division.

 

But I have noticed in the national media that the Bills are no longer the darlings to make a run like they were last year. A lot of them are putting the Phins and Jets over us never mind the Bengals and Chiefs.

 

I don't like it, but I'd rather the team stay hungry and have all the blackboard material. Last year, we were the Super Bowl for a lot of teams we faced. Let's see some B game

 

Is there any chance you guys might like to start a "Morons in Dallas Rent Headspace to Josh Allen" thread and leave this one for discussing training camp?

 

Please and Thank you!

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 3
Posted

This is fairly significant. In the last few years Buffalo has had more success with the "pin and pull" than when they have tried to move away from it. This is where Morse shines as well. Going back to this concept more would be a pretty good step. Also, shows Dorsey/Kromer are willing to evolve a bit.

  • Like (+1) 8
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, BuffaloBillyG said:

This is fairly significant. In the last few years Buffalo has had more success with the "pin and pull" than when they have tried to move away from it. This is where Morse shines as well. Going back to this concept more would be a pretty good step. Also, shows Dorsey/Kromer are willing to evolve a bit.

I especially like it with the additional lane options that 12 personnel gives you. Pulling guard along with a TE acting as blocking FB and another TE blocking on the end gives so many possible gaps for a RB with vision 

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Agree 3
Posted
14 minutes ago, BuffaloBillyG said:

This is fairly significant. In the last few years Buffalo has had more success with the "pin and pull" than when they have tried to move away from it. This is where Morse shines as well. Going back to this concept more would be a pretty good step. Also, shows Dorsey/Kromer are willing to evolve a bit.

 

Agree completely.  Morse is not a power run blocker.  Just Not.  He excels in pin and pull.  At least part of the Bills problems running the ball seem to have been, trying to execute run plays they don't have the Hawgs for.

 

This is the sort of thing that drives us all crazy wrt reff'ing.  "Sticky" coverage or holding? Davis jersey is stretched backwards in one of these pics

 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

Quick aside that I find interesting is that Gilliam is working exclusively with the TE group so far. It is speculation but last year he was treated as a blocker with the option to pass (I still love his week 2 TD) and I am wondering if that means TE will be expected for more FB duty

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

 

 

I will say I appreciate the info, but Greg Tompsett's photos don't necessarily seem to match his descriptors.  Maybe he's taking "live" photos and just posting the first frame as key or something?

 

  • Agree 4
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
1 minute ago, WhitewalkerInPhilly said:

Quick aside that I find interesting is that Gilliam is working exclusively with the TE group so far. It is speculation but last year he was treated as a blocker with the option to pass (I still love his week 2 TD) and I am wondering if that means TE will be expected for more FB duty

Maybe it's just that with no pads that he gets more out of TE reps than blocking reps right now?

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, WhitewalkerInPhilly said:

Quick aside that I find interesting is that Gilliam is working exclusively with the TE group so far. It is speculation but last year he was treated as a blocker with the option to pass (I still love his week 2 TD) and I am wondering if that means TE will be expected for more FB duty

 

That's a really good point.  We have seen some FB-like plays from other TE I believe, including a handoff.

Just now, Warcodered said:

Maybe it's just that with no pads that he gets more out of TE reps than blocking reps right now?

 

That's also a possibility - I was thinking myself "maybe that's just where he slots on the subset of plays they've installed so far."

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...