Alaska Darin Posted June 1, 2005 Share Posted June 1, 2005 Thomas Site "It shall be unlawful for any person who witnesses or learns of a violation of sections 416(b)(2), 417, 418, 419, 420, 424, or 426 to fail to report the offense to law enforcement officials within 24 hours of witnessing or learning of the violation and thereafter provide full assistance in the investigation, apprehension, and prosecution of the person violating paragraph (a). `(b) Any person who violates subsection (a) of this section shall be sentenced to not less than two years or more than 10 years. If the person who witnesses or learns of the violation is the parent or guardian, or otherwise responsible for the care or supervision of the person under the age of 18 or the incompetent person, such person shall be sentenced to not less than three years or more than 20 years.'." Ah, the US Government. Bringing the ridiculously expensive, draconian, and non-working Rockefeller laws to your community. At least they're winning the war against the Constitution. I'm shocked they're trying to pass it under the guise of "protecting the children." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted June 1, 2005 Share Posted June 1, 2005 Thomas Site "It shall be unlawful for any person who witnesses or learns of a violation of sections 416(b)(2), 417, 418, 419, 420, 424, or 426 to fail to report the offense to law enforcement officials within 24 hours of witnessing or learning of the violation and thereafter provide full assistance in the investigation, apprehension, and prosecution of the person violating paragraph (a). `(b) Any person who violates subsection (a) of this section shall be sentenced to not less than two years or more than 10 years. If the person who witnesses or learns of the violation is the parent or guardian, or otherwise responsible for the care or supervision of the person under the age of 18 or the incompetent person, such person shall be sentenced to not less than three years or more than 20 years.'." Ah, the US Government. Bringing the ridiculously expensive, draconian, and non-working Rockefeller laws to your community. At least they're winning the war against the Constitution. I'm shocked they're trying to pass it under the guise of "protecting the children." 348806[/snapback] I hate lawyers. I mean, who writes this stuff? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimshiz Posted June 1, 2005 Share Posted June 1, 2005 I don't agree with the "sentencing guidelines" part; but, what is wrong with having a law that forbids parents (for one) from providing illegal drugs to children? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted June 1, 2005 Author Share Posted June 1, 2005 I don't agree with the "sentencing guidelines" part; but, what is wrong with having a law that forbids parents (for one) from providing illegal drugs to children? 348911[/snapback] Because that's currently legal now? Slipperly slope, here we come. Take away a parent's right to corporally punish their children then put them in prison because the kids won't behave. More government is AWESOME. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chilly Posted June 1, 2005 Share Posted June 1, 2005 AD, that link's dead now,s ays searches are only available for an hour. Fuggin ridiculous! That really, REALLY needs to die, and NOW. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reuben Gant Posted June 2, 2005 Share Posted June 2, 2005 http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/F?c109...09UcEJmC:e1184: I love this stuff. Seems to include Pot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted June 2, 2005 Share Posted June 2, 2005 http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/F?c109...09UcEJmC:e1184:I love this stuff. Seems to include Pot. 349910[/snapback] This is what happens when we give the government power. And people want to extend its reach to health care? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimshiz Posted June 4, 2005 Share Posted June 4, 2005 What is wrong with having a law that forbids parents (for one) from providing illegal drugs to children? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reuben Gant Posted June 4, 2005 Share Posted June 4, 2005 What is wrong with having a law that forbids parents (for one) from providing illegal drugs to children? 350860[/snapback] Nothing. But that isn't the entire scope of the law. Just having the stuff within certain perimeters over a certain amount is intent to distribute. So, if I have cancer and smoke pot for medicinal puposes, and I am picking my kid up at a video arcade the law gives feds the scope to lock me up if I am reading this correctly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted June 4, 2005 Author Share Posted June 4, 2005 What is wrong with having a law that forbids parents (for one) from providing illegal drugs to children? 350860[/snapback] Again, is that currently LEGAL? If you are a parent and you give your children cocaine, would you go to jail? Answer: Yes. The new law would put YOU in jail if you found your kid's stash and flushed it down the toilet instead of turning him into the police. For a term not less than 3 years. Hello? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted June 4, 2005 Share Posted June 4, 2005 Take away a parent's right to corporally punish their children then put them in prison because the kids won't behave. More government is AWESOME. 348948[/snapback] Motherment Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Gross Posted June 7, 2005 Share Posted June 7, 2005 Again, is that currently LEGAL? If you are a parent and you give your children cocaine, would you go to jail? Answer: Yes. The new law would put YOU in jail if you found your kid's stash and flushed it down the toilet instead of turning him into the police. For a term not less than 3 years. Hello? 350961[/snapback] ...and up to 20. You'd get less time for flushing your kid down the toilet... So now if I see someone lighting one on the street, I have to go tell the cops, or I go to jail?! What a program! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted June 7, 2005 Share Posted June 7, 2005 So now if I see someone lighting one on the street, I have to go tell the cops, or I go to jail?! What a program! Uh, now I really have incentive to get out of NYC! This is insanity. EDIT: This is so disturbing that I actually just wrote my Congressmen, something I almost never bother to do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted June 7, 2005 Author Share Posted June 7, 2005 ...and up to 20. You'd get less time for flushing your kid down the toilet... So now if I see someone lighting one on the street, I have to go tell the cops, or I go to jail?! What a program! 352909[/snapback] That doesn't sound at all like Nazi Germany, does it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Gross Posted June 7, 2005 Share Posted June 7, 2005 Uh, now I really have incentive to get out of NYC! This is insanity. 352928[/snapback] ...and never go to a rock concert again.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beausox Posted June 7, 2005 Share Posted June 7, 2005 Is not pot illegal? Just how many have terminal illnesses? Had I a terminal illness I would do pretty much do as I please. My lawyer is good enough to stall til my death. Save that obey the law and expect that you may outlive the consequences. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts